Abstract
Every study is designed and carried out with the expectation that it will have value. The expectation at the early stages of the study is that scientifically valid and ethically collected evidence about the research questions will contribute to increased knowledge, and that the study findings will be important for decision making about further research, public health policy, or patient care. Near the end of the study, the time has come for all stakeholders to check if these early expectations have been met. It is time to interpret the obtained statistical evidence in the light of the achieved internal validity, and to reflect on the generalizability of the findings and on possible lines of action supported by them. In this chapter, we argue that this evaluation is mainly the task of peer reviewers and other critical readers or listeners. Investigators should provide the necessary objective and unambiguous information to make the task possible. That information should consist of correctly described statistical results and a complete account of issues relevant to study validity.
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.
Winston Churchill
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Frost C, Thompson SG (2000) Correcting for regression dilution bias: comparison of methods for a single predictor variable. J R Stat Soc 163:173–189
Glynn JR (1993) A question of attribution. Lancet 342:530–532
Greenland S (1992) Divergent biases in ecologic and individual-level studies. Stat Med 11:1209–1223
Hill AB (1965) The environment and disease: association and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 58:295–300
Morgenstern H (1998) Ecologic studies. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S (eds) Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 459–480. ISBN 0316757802
Porta M, Greenland S, Last JM (2008) A dictionary of epidemiology. A handbook sponsored by the I.E.A, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–289. ISBN 9780195314496
Vandenbroucke JP (1989) Those who were wrong. Am J Epidemiol 130:3–5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van den Broeck, J., Brestoff, J.R., Engebretsen, I. (2013). Interpretation of Findings. In: Van den Broeck, J., Brestoff, J. (eds) Epidemiology: Principles and Practical Guidelines. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5989-3_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5989-3_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5988-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5989-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)