Skip to main content

The Children’s Court of Victoria

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Australia's Children's Courts Today and Tomorrow

Part of the book series: Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research ((CHIR,volume 7))

Abstract

Victoria, located on the mainland in south-east Australia, enjoys a ­relatively low youth crime rate and the lowest youth detention rate in Australia. The number of substantiated child abuse cases is 5.7 per 1,000. The Children’s Court of Victoria has two major divisions, the Criminal Division and the Family Division (which deals with child protection matters). The court is embedded in an adversarial legal system. The age jurisdictions of the two divisions are 10 years to less than 18 years and birth to less than 18 years, respectively. In child protection matters, the threshold for statutory intervention is a high one, namely, significant harm. The Victorian study involved data collection in both metropolitan Melbourne and regional locations. Individual interviews were conducted with 20 magistrates, while six focus groups were conducted involving 60 practitioners associated with the Children’s Court. Among the study’s most salient findings were concerns about the excessively adversarial nature of the Family Division, the court’s heavy workload, satisfaction with the court’s structure but concern about its overlap with other tribunals and the need for further training of magistrates, child protection workers who appear in court and lawyers. Further findings pointed to the inadequacy of court facilities, the challenges of an increasingly complex clientele, an environment in the Family Division often experienced as a hostile one by child protection workers in particular, the difficulty the court’s clientele experiences in understanding its processes and support for extending the Children’s Koori (Indigenous) Court. Among the reforms supported by study participants were ones that would permit ­ongoing case monitoring and case management and the use of alternative dispute resolution approaches, especially in the Family Division.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2012, September 2011). Australian demographic statistics (Catalogue No. 3101.0). Canberra: The Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu, L. A., & Cesaroni, C. (1999). Changing role of the youth court judge. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 3(7), 363–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Children’s Court of Victoria. (2010). Annual report 2009–2010. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education Victoria. (2011). The state of Victoria’s children 2010. Melbourne: The Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Human Services Victoria. (2003, September). Protecting children: The child protection outcomes project. Report by Allen Consulting for the Victorian Government. Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, Mr Justice John. (1993, July). Protective services for children in Victoria. Report for the Victorian Government, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiberg, A., Kirby, P., & Ward, L. (2004). The report of the panel to oversee the consultation on protecting children: The Child Protection Outcomes Project. Melbourne: Department of Human Services Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission of Inquiry into the Prevention of Child Abuse. (1996). Childhood matters. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Victorian Ombudsman. (2009). Own motion investigation into the Department of Human Services Child Protection Program, Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., & Swain, S. (2002). Confronting cruelty: Historical perspectives on child protection in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sentencing Advisory Council. (2011). Statutory minimum sentences for gross violence offences report. Melbourne: The Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sentencing Advisory Council. (2012). Sentencing children and young people in Victoria. Melbourne: The Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, R. (2001). Magistrates decision-making in child protection cases. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, P., & Powell, M. (2012). Youth (in)justice: Oral language competence in early life and risk for engagement in antisocial behaviour in adolescence (Trends and Issues No. 435). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Auditor-General. (1996). Annual report, 1995–6. Melbourne: Victorian Auditor-General’s Office, October, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Child Welfare Practice and Legislation Review. (1984). Report commissioned by the Minister for Community Services Victoria, Chair: Professor Terry Carney, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Law Reform Commission. (2010). Protection applications in the children’s court: Final report. Melbourne: The Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundersitz, J. (1997). Pre-court diversion: The Australian experience. In A. Borowski & I. O’Connor (Eds.), Juvenile crime. Justice and corrections (pp. 270–291). South Melbourne: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youth Parole Board and Youth Residential Board Victoria. (2011). Annual report, 2010–11. Melbourne: Department of Human Services Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan Borowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Borowski, A., Sheehan, R. (2013). The Children’s Court of Victoria. In: Sheehan, R., Borowski, A. (eds) Australia's Children's Courts Today and Tomorrow. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5928-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics