Skip to main content

Simplified Ecological Planning Method for Sustainable Landscape Management by Humantope Index: Patterns of Land-Use Continuity, Historical Land Use and Landownership

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development

Part of the book series: Strategies for Sustainability ((STSU))

  • 2613 Accesses

Abstract

The adaptability of the McHarg planning method seems high. However, separated multiple ecological factors must be evaluated for every land-use proposal. The LPPV method needs only two factors (layers): potential natural vegetation and land form. Nevertheless, the artificial environment such as a city area cannot be evaluated using the vegetation division pattern. An actual adaptation of these two methods is limited for reasons above. Also, these divisions by physical and biological index require agreements at many landowners and local administrations. Hence, the purpose of this chapter is to propose a shortened planning process that incorporates the advantages of McHarg and LPPV methods using a smaller number of indices in a society’s environmental division for environmental management guidelines. We set up the hypothesis that there is the possibility that past land-use patterns could be treated as a result of land evaluation of people. We focused on three important human-induced land patterns to develop the Humantope index: (1) continuity and stability of land use, (2) traditional land-use-adapted local environment and (3) landownership as spatial management result. Hence, our Humantope index is a highly informative synthesis and corresponding to natural environment and artificial environment. Moreover, Humantope index would be a simplified procedures compared to those of complex one like the rank evaluation of McHarg and potential vegetation estimates of LPPV. It is convenient to link concerns of landowners and local administrations because the Humantope division could be easily acceptable for landowners and local administration unit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Comins JS, Sendra JB, Sanz FM (1993) Crisis and permanence of the traditional Mediterranean landscape in the central region of Spain. Landscape Urban Plan 23(3–4):155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kameyama Akira (1973) Phytosociological studies for rural land use planning. Jpn Soc Appl Phytosociol 2:1–52

    Google Scholar 

  • McHarg IL (1969) Design with nature. The Natural History Press, Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller W, Collins MG, Steiner FR, Cook E (1998) An approach for greenway suitability analysis. Landscape Urban Plan 42(2):91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shingu Town (1997) Shingu-choshi (shingu town record). Shingu Town, Fukuoka. Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Skanes HM (1997) Towards an integrated ecological-geographical landscape perspective. A review of principal concepts and methods. Norwegian J Geogr 51(3):145–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner F (1983) Resource suitability: methods for analyses. Environ Manage 7(5):401–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi Kazuhiko (1976) Methode der landschaftsokologischen Beewertung fur die Planung der Landschaft. Jpn Soc Appl Phytosociol 5:1–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Uehara Misato, Shigematsu Toshinori (2001) Fundamental study on the conservation and utilization of local resources with organic recycle system in AINOSIMA Isle. J Jpn Inst Landscape Arch 64(5):831–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SY, Liu JS, Yang CJ (2008) Eco-environmental vulnerability evaluation in the Yellow River Basin China. Pedosphere 18(2):171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemen L, Hein L, Martinus EF, van Mensvoort MEF, Verburg PH (2010) Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecol Indic 10(1):62–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B): KAKENHI(22760455) and the “Shinshu University Mountainous Areas Research Project,” supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan in fiscal 2011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Misato Uehara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uehara, M. (2013). Simplified Ecological Planning Method for Sustainable Landscape Management by Humantope Index: Patterns of Land-Use Continuity, Historical Land Use and Landownership. In: Kawakami, M., Shen, Zj., Pai, Jt., Gao, Xl., Zhang, M. (eds) Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development. Strategies for Sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5922-0_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics