Advertisement

The Role of the Knowledge Community and Transmission of Knowledge: A Case of Bicycle SMEs in Taiwan

  • Jen-te PaiEmail author
  • Tai-shan Hu
Chapter
Part of the Strategies for Sustainability book series

Abstract

In the era of the knowledge economy, knowledge comprises the core of economic growth, making the exploration of the spatial organization of knowledge generation an important issue. This study clarifies the knowledge generation process. In terms of the development mode, the Taiwanese bicycle industry can be geographically divided into northern, central, and southern regions. Each area possesses its own independent system with related and cooperative factories. Dajia, located in central Taiwan, is the most mature of the three. The geographical closeness of and industrial cooperation between community structures allow them to share resources, reduce deal prices, and promote professional investment. Even social networks can be exploited to produce and promote creativity. Therefore, this investigation proposed utilizing knowledge groups to understand spatial organizational style, with particular reference to villages. The study results demonstrate that the knowledge activities conducted in Dajia bicycle village are determined by the composition of the village, cooperation within the industry, and effective support from industrial and social resources.

Keywords

Industrial cluster Knowledge community Bicycle industry 

References

  1. Baptista R, Swann P (1998) Do firms in clusters innovate more? Res Policy 27:525–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell ERJ (1993) Some current issues in technology transfer and academic-industrial relations: a review. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 5(3):307–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boschma RA (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud 39(1):61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breschi S (2000) The geography of innovation: a cross-sector analysis. Reg Stud 34(3):213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camagni RP (1995) The concept of innovative milieu and its relevance for public policies in European lagging regions. Pap Reg Sci 74(4):317–340Google Scholar
  6. Chang HL, Chang HW (2009) Exploring recreational cyclists’ environmental preferences and satisfaction: experimental study in Hsinchu technopolis. Environ Plan B Plan Des 36:319–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chuang WS (2005) A study on the competitive factors of bicycle industrial cluster in Dajia area. Master’s thesis, National Taiwan UniversityGoogle Scholar
  8. Cowan R, Hultén S (1996) Escaping lock-in: the case of the electric vehicle. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 53:61–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feldman MP (1994) Technological infrastructure. In: Feldman MP (ed) The geography of innovation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 51–75Google Scholar
  10. Hu T-S, Lin C-Y, Chang S-L (2005) Role of interaction between technological communities and industrial clustering in innovative activity: a case of Hsinchu district, Taiwan. Urban Stud 42(7):1139–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Isaksen A, Aslesen HW (2001) Oslo: in what way an innovative city. Eur Plan Stud 9(7):871–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Malmberg A (1997) Industrial geography: location and learning. Prog Hum Geogr 21(4):573–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Malmberg A, Maskell P (2002) The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environ Plan A 34:429–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Massey D, Quintas P, Wield D (1992) High tech fantasies: science parks in society, science and space. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Monck CSP, Porter RB, Quintas P, Wynarczyk P (1988) Science parks and the growth of high technology firms. Croom Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Oakey RP (1985) High-technology industry and agglomeration economies. In: Hall P, Markusen A (eds) Silicon landscapes. ALLEN & UMWIN, BostonGoogle Scholar
  17. Porter ME (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Macmillan, London/BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  18. Ritsila JJ (1999) Regional differences in environments for enterprises. Entrep Reg Dev 11(3):187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saxenian A (1994) Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  20. Storper M (1995) Competitiveness policy options: the technology-regions connection. Growth Chang 26:285–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Torre A, Gilly JP (2000) On the analytical dimension of proximity dynamics. Reg Stud 34:169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Torre A, Rallet S (2005) Proximity and localization. Reg Stud 39(1):47–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Westhead P, Batstone S (1998) Independent technology-based firms: the perceived benefits of a science park location. Urban Stud 35(12):2197–2219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu JH, Chen HS (2001) A study on innovation diffusion and spatial interaction of firms in the industrial zones firms of Taiwan. Sun Yat-Sen Manag Rev 9(2):179–200 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. Yigitcanlar T, Velibeyoglu K, Martinez-Fernandez C (2008) Rising knowledge cities: the role of knowledge precincts. J Knowl Manag 12(5):8–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Land EconomicsNational Chengchi UniversityTaipei CityTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Architecture and Urban PlanningChung Hua UniversityHsinchuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations