Skip to main content

Assessment Understood as Enabling

A Time to Rebalance Improvement and Accountability Goals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Designing Assessment for Quality Learning

Part of the book series: The Enabling Power of Assessment ((EPAS,volume 1))

Abstract

This chapter outlines a perspective of educational assessment as enabling, whereby the learner is central and assessment is focused on supporting the knowledge, skills and dispositions necessary for lifelong learning. It argues that better education for young people is achievable when educational policy and practice give priority to learning improvement, thereby making assessment for accountability a related, though secondary, concern. The chapter describes how this work of internationally recognized scholars brings together diverse perspectives and theoretical frameworks and, in so doing, provides readers with a range of ways to consider their pathway through the book. A ‘map’ and summaries of chapters suggest a reading according to a thematic approach, geographical setting, author/s profile or content purposes depending on the reader’s own priorities. A section on assessment past, present, and futures calls for a rebalancing of improvement and accountability goals, and for countries to be careful to avoid privileging large-scale testing over other forms of data about learning and achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For further information contact the series editor, Claire Wyatt-Smith, Claire.Wyatt-Smith@acu.edu.au

References

  • Ainscow, M. (2010). Achieving excellence and equity: Reflections on the development of practices in one local district over 10 years. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R., O’Sullivan, D., & Berryman, M. (2010). Scaling up education reform: Addressing the politics of disparity. Wellington: NZCER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (R. Nice, transl., 2nd edn). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (2004). Getting out of deficit: Pedagogies of reconnection. Teaching Education, 15(3), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, S. (2012). ‘Students’ cultural capital: A study of assessment for learning as a field of exchange. Unpublished PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S., & Brown, J. (2005). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organizational Science, 10(4): 381–400.   <http://orgsci.journal.informs.org/content/10/4/381.short> Accessed 3 Nov 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooksey, R., Freebody, P., & Wyatt-Smith, C. M. (2007). Assessment as judgement-in-context: Analysing how teachers evaluate students’ writing. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(5), 401–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipwell, P., & Klenowski, V. (2011). A case for addressing the literacy demands of student assessment. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(2), 127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, K., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2010). Student assessment and digital futures. How shall we know them? In G. Finger & M. Lee (Eds.), The Home–School Nexus: The development of networked school communities (pp. 259–276). Camberwell: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. M. (2014). Standards, moderation and teacher judgement: Policy and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., Cazden, C., Coopes, R., Klenowski, V., Ladwig, J., Lester, J., MacDonald, S., Phillips, J., Shield, P., Spina, N., Theroux, P., Tones, M., Villegas, M., & Woods, A. (2013). A summative evaluation of the stronger smarter learning communities project, March 2013 Report, Volume 1. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahuika, R., Berryman, M., & Bishop, R. (2011). Issues of culture and assessment in New Zealand education pertaining to Mãori students. Assessment Matters, 3, 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCEEDYA, Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs. (2009). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Education Action Plan 2010–2014. Canberra: MCEEDYA.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC, National Research Council. (2011). Incentives and test-based accountability in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data: Oslo Manual (3rd edn, prepared by the Working Party of National Experts on Scientific and Technology Indicators). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Synergies for Better Learning: An International Perspective on Evaluation and Assessment Synergies for Better Learning. Report on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes. <www.oecd.org/site/eduistp13/Synergies%20for%20Better%20Learning%20-%20Policy%20Pointers.pdf> Accessed 17 April 2013.

  • Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor-An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14, 535–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt-Smith, C. M., & Cumming, J. J. (2003). Curriculum literacies: Expanding domains of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 10(1), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt-Smith, C. M., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Explicit, latent and meta-criteria: Types of criteria at play in professional judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 20(1), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Wyatt-Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V., Colbert, P. (2014). Assessment Understood as Enabling. In: Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V., Colbert, P. (eds) Designing Assessment for Quality Learning. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5902-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics