Advertisement

Case 14: Qimaavik Women’s Shelter

  • Anne M. LavackEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Applying Quality of Life Research: book series (BEPR)

Abstract

The Qimaavik Women’s Shelter (QWS), located in Canada’s far north, provides female victims of domestic violence with a safe place to stay on a short-term basis. This case examines the challenges involved in demand management. While it is essential to ensure that available services are fully utilised, it is also important to ensure that excessive demand is not created. Counselling is an important tool to direct women to community resources and housing options outside of QWS, in order to help manage demand for its services.

Keywords

Domestic Violence Executive Director Adult Child Social Housing Demand Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Debbie Paquette for her willingness to share her time and knowledge with the author of this article.

References

  1. Ansara DL, Hinden MJ (2010) Formal and informal help-seeking associated with women’s and men’s experiences of intimate partner violence in Canada. Soc Sci Med 70:1011–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billson JM (2001) Inuit dreams, Inuit realities: shattering the bonds of dependency. Am Rev Can Stud 31:283–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billson JM (2006) Shifting gender regimes: the complexities of domestic violence among Canada’s Inuit. Inuit Stud 30:69–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. George D (2006) Qimaavik shelter gets partial reprieve. Nunatsiaq News, October 27Google Scholar
  5. Healey GK, Meadows LM (2007) Inuit women’s health in Nunavut, Canada: a review of the literature. Int J Circumpolar Health 66:199–214Google Scholar
  6. Iyengar R, Sabik L (2009) The dangerous shortage of domestic violence services. Health Aff 28:1052–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Janoviček N (2007) No place to go: local histories of the battered women’s shelter movement. UBC Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  8. Kennedy AC, Adams A, Bybee D, Campbell R, Kubiak SP, Sullivan C (2012) A model of sexually and physically victimized women’s process of attaining effective formal help over time: the role of social location, context, and intervention. Am J Community Psychol 50(1–2):217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Law SF, Hutton EM (2007) Community psychiatry in the Canadian Arctic: reflections from a 1-year continuous consultation series in Iqaluit, Nunavut. Can J Community Ment Health 26:123–140Google Scholar
  10. Légaré A (2008) Canada’s experiment with Aboriginal self-determination in Nunavut: from vision to illusion. Int J Minor Group Rights 15:335–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lovelock C (1984) Strategies for managing demand in capacity-constrained service organizations. Serv Ind J 4:12–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Macy RJ, Giattina MC, Parish SL, Crosby C (2010) Domestic violence and sexual assault services: historical concerns and contemporary challenges. J Interpers Violence 25:3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rogers S (2011) Iqaluit’s Qimaavik shelter overwhelmed, underfunded: director. Nunatsiaq News online. http://www.nunatsiaqonline.ca/stories/article/23887_iqaluits_qimaavik_shelter_overwhelmed_underfunded_director/
  14. Sookraj D, Hutchinson P, Evans M, Murphy MA (2012) Aboriginal organizational response to the need for culturally appropriate services in three small Canadian cities. J Soc Work 12(2):136–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tester F (2009) Iglutaasaavut (our new homes): neither ‘new’ nor ‘ours’ – housing challenges of the Nunavut territorial government. J Can Stud 43:137–158Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Thompson Rivers UniversityVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations