Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning Strategies, Study Skills, and Self-Regulated Learning in Postsecondary Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research

Part of the book series: Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research ((HATR,volume 28))

Abstract

Interest in learning strategies and study tactics seems at all-time high. In this chapter, approaches to studying are conceptualized as self-regulated learning whereby learners survey tasks, generate goals and devise plans for studying, study and make on-the-spot adaptations, and may substantially renovate studying methods. Relative to this framework, the content of books describing learning strategies is examined, methods used to research learners’ approaches to studying are analyzed, and results of studies investigating the effects of learning strategies/study tactics are summarized. Shortcomings of research methodologies may account for overall modest and rather variable findings about the benefits of learning strategies/study tactics. Also, factors are identified that may hinder learners’ uptake and productive use of learning strategies/study tactics. A plan is proposed for improving and accelerating research on learning strategies. It involves learners as colleagues in personalized programs of research that, in the aggregate, advance learning science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, P. A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1998). A perspective on strategy research: Programs and prospects. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 129–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin, L. P., & Winne, P. H. (2009, June). nStudy: An internet tool to support learning, collaboration and researching learning strategies. Canadian e-Learning Conference. Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caverly, D. C., Orlando, V. P., & Mullen, J. L. (2000). Textbook study reading. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Teaching reaching and study strategies at the college level (pp. 86–165). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L., Cronbach, L. J., Kupermintz, H., Lohman, D. F., Mandinach, E. B., Porteus, A. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • CredĂ©, M., & Kuncel, N. R. (2008). Study habits, skills, and attitudes: The third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 425–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R. (2011). Self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 54, 103–140. Elsevier Inc.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognitive and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F. (2006). Do your students really understand your assignment? LTC Currents Newsletter, 2(3), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., Tevaarwerk, K. L., & Ross, S. (2005, April). Do study skills texts foster self-regulated learning: A content analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, QC, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (1996). Study strategies have meager support: A review with recommendations for implementation. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 692–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2012). Promoting learning skills in undergraduate students. In M. J. Lawson & J. R. Kirby (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and mental structures (pp. 201–227). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, P., & Tsakiris, M. (2009). The experience of agency: Feelings, judgments and responsibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 242–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, E. P., Child, D. A., & Walberg, H. J. (1988). Can comprehension be taught? A quantitative synthesis of “metacognitive” studies. Educational Researcher, 77(9), 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henk, W. A., & Stahl, N. A. (1985). A meta-analysis of the effect of notetaking on learning from lectures. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 34, 70–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horak, W. J. (1985, April). Meta-analysis of learning science concepts from textual materials. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, French Lick Springs, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igo, L. B., Bruning, R., & McCrudden, M. T. (2005). Exploring differences in students’ copy-and-paste decision making and processing: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 103–116. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karabenick, S. A., Woolley, M. E., Friedel, J. M., Ammon, B. V., Blazevski, J., Bonney, C. R., DeGroot, E., et al. (2007). Cognitive processing of self-report items in educational research: Do they think what we mean? Educational Psychologist, 42, 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Shwalb, B. J. (1983). College programs for high-risk and disadvantaged students: A meta-analysis of findings. Review of Educational Research, 53, 397–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. F. W. (2009). Predicting university students’ performance on a complex task: Does task understanding moderate the influence of self-efficacy? Unpublished Master’s thesis. University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M., & Hadwin, A. F. (2010, May). Supporting university success: Examining the influence of explicit and implicit task understanding and self-efficacy on task performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. H., & Seier, W. L. (1994). Strategy utilization deficiencies in children: When, where, and why. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 25, pp. 107–156). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcavy-Ernt, P. I., & Caverly, D. C. (2009). Strategic study-reading. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 177–198). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76, 413–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nist, S., & Simpson, M. L. (1989). PLAE, a validated study strategy. Journal of Reading, 33, 182–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oshige, M. (2009). Exploring task understanding in self-regulated learning: Task understanding as a predictor of academic success in undergraduate students. Unpublished Master’s thesis. University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., GarcĂ­a, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college out- comes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, F. P. (1946). Effective study. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, V. (1980, March). College reading and study programs: Do they make any difference? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western College Reading Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R., & Towne, L. (2002). Scientific research in education: Report of the National Research Council’s committee on scientific principles in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, M. L. (1986). Prope: A writing strategy for studying and learning in the content areas. Journal of Reading, 29, 407–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: what we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 421–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. In P. R. Pintrich & M. Boekaerts (Eds.), Handbook on self-regulation (pp. 727–747). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., Schulte, A., & Palmer, D. R. (1987). The learning and study strategies inventory. Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (1982). Minimizing the black box problem to enhance the validity of theories about instructional effects. Instructional Science, 11, 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (1983). Distortions of construct validity in multiple regression analysis. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 15, 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 153–189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (2010a). Bootstrapping learner’s self-regulated learning. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 472–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (2010b). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (2011). A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 15–32). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (in press). nStudy: Tracing and supporting self-regulated learning in the Internet. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. L. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of self-reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 551–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. L. (2003). Self-regulating studying by objectives for learning: Students’ reports compared to a model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., Zhou, M., & Egan, R. (2011). Designing assessments of self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & D. H. Robinson (Eds.), Assessment of higher-order thinking skills (pp. 89–118). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M., & Winne, P. H. (2012). Modeling academic achievement by self-reported versus traced goal orientation. Learning and Instruction, 22, 413–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Alissa Bick Ehrenkranz provided significant assistance in identifying and analyzing source materials for this chapter. Support for this work was provided by grants to Philip H. Winne from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (410-2011-0727), the Canada Research Chair Program, and Simon Fraser University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada

    Philip H. Winne Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Philip H. Winne Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip H. Winne Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Policy and, Leadership Studies, University of Iowa, Lindquist Center N491, Iowa City, 52242-1529, Iowa, USA

    Michael B. Paulsen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winne, P.H. (2013). Learning Strategies, Study Skills, and Self-Regulated Learning in Postsecondary Education. In: Paulsen, M. (eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5836-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation