Skip to main content

Conservation Connecting Multiple Scales of Place

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Place-Based Conservation

Abstract

This chapter stretches the notion of place and its role in conservation by exploring interactions across multiple scales via new forms of governance. This process may enable rural, resource-dependent communities, previously deemed incapable of asserting much influence on decision-making, to engage in extra-local relationships to better serve their community interests. Theoretical explorations of place, scale, community and regional fields, and governance are followed by a summary of emerging place-based influences on decision-making in the context of recent widespread landscape disturbance in north central Colorado. In this case, new relationships were forged via expanding place and multi-scale linkages and innovative forms of governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This example follows from Kirby (1989) who suggested that “city politics in Houston could never be confused with city politics in San Francisco” (p. 323), and from Massey (1994) who focused on the changes in places and the conceptualization of place over time.

  2. 2.

    Communities included in the study of this region are Breckenridge, Dillon, Frisco, Granby, Kremmling, Silverthorne, Steamboat Springs, Vail, and most of Jackson County. Counties are Eagle, Grand, Jackson, Routt, and Summit.

  3. 3.

    This effort was initially named the Northern Colorado Bark Beetle Cooperative (NCBBC).

References

  • Agnew, J. A., & Duncan, J. S. (1989). The power of place: Bringing together geographical and sociological imaginations. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, A. M., & Carroll, M. S. (1995). Your place or mine: The effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings. Society and Natural Resources, 8, 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25, 591–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2003). Place: Connections and boundaries in an interdependent world. In S. L. Halloway, S. P. Rice, & G. Valentine (Eds.), Key concepts in geography (pp. 165–185). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, A. S., Kruger, L. E., & Daniels, S. (2003). Place as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: Propositions for a social science research agenda. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, B., Goodwin, M., Pemberton, S., & Woods, M. (2001). Partnerships, power, and scale in rural governance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19, 289–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint, C. G., & Brennan, M. A. (2006). Tapping the potential of rural Community Emergency Response Teams. Rural Realities, 1(3), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, C. G., & Luloff, A. E. (2005). Natural resource-based communities, risks, and disasters: An intersection of theories. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint, C. G., Luloff, A. E., & Theodori, G. L. (2010). Extending the concept of community interaction to explore regional community fields. Journal of Rural Social Science, 25, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, C. G., McFarlane, B., & Müller, M. (2009). Human dimensions of forest disturbance by insects: An international synthesis. Environmental Management, 43, 1174–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. V., & Stern, P. (2009). Reluctant rural regionalists. Journal of Rural Studies, 25, 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, R. (1939). The nature of geography. Lancaster, PA: Association of American Geographers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, S. (2005). The trapdoor of community. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95, 850–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt, R. (2003). Scale. In J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, & G. Toal (Eds.), A companion to political geography (pp. 138–157). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. J. (1991). A question of place. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O., & Little, J. (2000). Rural challenge(s): Partnership and new rural governance. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, D. (1990). Community and the politics of place. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, A. (1989). A sense of place. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6, 322–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luloff, A. E., & Bridger, J. (2003). Community agency and local development. In D. Brown & L. Swanson (Eds.), Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century (pp. 203–213). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luloff, A. E., Krannich, R. S., Theodori, G. L., Koons-Trentelman, C., & Williams, T. (2004). The use of community in natural resource management. In M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, B. L. Bruyere, D. R. Field, & P. J. Brown (Eds.), Society and natural resources: A summary of knowledge (pp. 249–259). Jefferson, MO: Modern Litho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, S. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24, 219–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1979). In what sense is a regional problem? Regional Studies, 13, 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (1994). Space, place, and gender. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, W. C., Hall, T. E., & Kruger, L. E. (2009). Improving the integration of recreation management with management of other natural resources by applying concepts of scale from ecology. Environmental Management, 43, 369–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paasi, A. (2004). Place and region: Looking through the prism of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 536–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, J., & Goodwin, M. (1995). Local governance and concrete research: Investigating the uneven development of regulation. Economy and Society, 24, 334–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. (1984). Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time-geography of becoming places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 72, 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, H., & Flint, C. G. (2010). Capturing community context of human response to forest disturbance by insects: A multi-method assessment. Human Ecology, 38, 267–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Staeheli, L. A. (2003). Place. In J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, & G. Toal (Eds.), A companion to political geography (pp. 158–168). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local: “Glocalization” and the politics of scale. In K. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local (pp. 137–166). New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodori, G. E. (2005). Community and community development in resource-based areas: Operation definitions rooted in an interactional perspective. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 661–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, K. (1991). The community in rural America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., & Stewart, S. I. (1998). Sense of place: An elusive concept that is finding a home in ecosystem management. Journal of Forestry, 96, 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Courtney Flint .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flint, C. (2013). Conservation Connecting Multiple Scales of Place. In: Stewart, W., Williams, D., Kruger, L. (eds) Place-Based Conservation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5802-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics