Abstract
In this concluding chapter of the book, the key results are recapitulated and implications of the findings for policy, practice and theory are reflected upon. In addressing these mounting challenges, focussing on how to transition and transform to more sustainable water governance and management paradigms, is a crucial piece of the puzzle that includes technical and hard infrastructural adaptation, but should not be limited to it. It is high time that the social and institutional infrastructure that defines the decision making environment for technical and physical infrastructural adaptation is paid equal attention. Water governance regimes do need to be both adaptable to amalgamating pressures as climate change develops but also structured to foster elements of a system that allows for more holistic and sustainable adaptation to take place. However, beyond certain tipping points, there are state changes to which adaptation and the ability to cope may be virtually impossible. Thus, policies and institutions focussing on mitigation and adaptation should become better integrated in order to take better advantage of potentially valuable synergies, and ensure the avoidance of mal-adaptation that might in turn increase climate change drivers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The range of technological options, structure of institutions, stock of human and social capital, access to risk-spreading procedures, ability of decision makers to manage information, public perception of causes of change and likely impacts (Adger et al. 2007).
References
Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bauer C (2004) Siren song: Chilean water law as a model for international reform. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
Behncke Izquierdo I (2011) Evolution’s gift of play, from bonobo apes to humans. Paper presented at the TED 2011, Longbeach, CA, March 2011
Dourojeanni A, Jouravlev AS (1999) El Código de Aguas de Chile: entre la ideología y la realidad. vol LC/R.1897. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, Santiago de Chile
DuPasquier A (2011) Promoting an alliance between town, country and the mountains. Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung, 10 Oct 2011
Engle NL, Johns OR, Lemos MC, Nelson DR (2011) Integrated and adaptive management of water resources: tensions, legacies, and the next best thing. Ecol Soc 16(1):19 [online]. URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss11/art19/
Fulton Suri J (2011) What nature can teach us about design. Paper presented at the TEDx WWF. Geneva, Switzerland, 13 Oct 2011
Gelcich S, Hughes T, Olsson P, Folke C, Defeo O, Fernández M, Foale S, Gunderson LH, Rodríguez-Sickert C, Scheffer M, Steneck RS, Castilla JC (2010) Navigating transformations in governance of Chilean marine coastal resources. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(39):16794–16799
Gupta J, Termeer C, Klostermann J, Meijerink S, Van den Brink M, Jong P, Nooteboom S, Bergsma E (2010) The adaptive capacity wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environ Sci Policy 13(6):459–471. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.006
Harmon R (2010) How the market can keep streams flowing. Paper presented at the TEDx Rainier. Seattle, WA, 10 Oct 2010
Ingram H (2011) Beyond universal remedies for good water governance: a political and contextual approach. In: Garrido A, Ingram H (eds) Water for Food in a Changing World. Routledge, New York, pp 241–261
Keskitalo CH, Dannevig H, Hovelsrud G, West JJ, Gerger Swartling Å (2010) Adaptive capacity determinants in developed states: examples from the Nordic countries and Russia. Reg Environ Chang [Online]. doi:10.1007/s10113-010-0182-9
Matthews JH, Wickel BAJ, Freeman S (2011) Converging currents in climate-relevant conservation: water, infrastructure, and institutions. PLoS Biol 9(9):e1001159. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001159
McDonough W, Braungart M (2002) Cradle to cradle. North Point Press, New York
Medema W, McIntosh BS, Jeffrey PJ (2008) From premise to practice: a critical assessment of integrated water resources management. Ecol Soc 13(2):29 [online]. URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss22/art29/
Meier D (2011) Kosten für Hochwasserschutz steigen massiv. Deutsche Radio Schweiz, 13 Oct 2011
Meinzen-Dick R (2007) Beyond panaceas in water institutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(39):15200–15205
OECD (1997) Better understanding our cities: the role of urban indicators. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
Ostrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(39):419–422
Ostrom E (2010) A multi-scale approach to coping with climate change and other collective action problems. Solutions 1(2):27–36 [Online]. http://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/node/565
Pearce WB (2002) Systems: schools of thought and traditions of practice. The Fielding Graduate Institute, Santa Barbara
SABMiller (2009) Water futures. http://www.sabmiller.com/index.asp?pageid=1772. Accessed 15 Oct 2011
Slocombe DS (1998) Defining goals and criteria for ecosystem-based management. Environ Manage 22(4):483–493
Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):282–292
Smith DM, Barchiesi S (2009) Environment as infrastructure – resilience to climate change impacts on water through investments in nature IUCN. Gland, Switzerland
Sutherland R (2011) The new sweet spot – and how to find it paper presented at the TEDx WWF. Geneva, Switzerland, 13 Oct 2011
Thobani M (1995) Tradable property rights to water: how to improve water use and resolve the water conflicts. Finance & Private Sector Development Note no. 34. World Bank, Washington, DC
Tompkins EL, Adger WN (2004) Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change? Ecol Soc 9(2):10 [online]. URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss12/art10
Tompkins EL, Adger WN (2005) Defining response capacity to enhance climate change policy. Environ Sci Policy 8:562–571
Wales A (2011) The water-food-energy nexus – why everything you consume is connected. Paper presented at the TEDx WWF. Geneva, Switzerland, 13 Oct 2011
Yohe G, Tol RSJ (2002) Indicators for social and economic coping capacity – moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Chang 12(1):25–40
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hill, M. (2013). Addressing the Challenge of Institutional Infrastructure in a Technically Focussed World. In: Climate Change and Water Governance. Advances in Global Change Research, vol 54. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5796-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5796-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5795-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5796-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)