Advertisement

Factor X pp 249-273 | Cite as

Reducing Resource Consumption – A Proposal for Global Resource and Environmental Policy

  • Paul EkinsEmail author
  • Bernd Meyer
  • Friedrich Schmidt-Bleek
  • Friedrich Schneider
Chapter
Part of the Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science book series (ECOE, volume 29)

Abstract

Environmental and resource economics do not give the emphasis to ecosystem functions and the natural world that their importance to human welfare and the economy warrant. Insights from ecological economics, in contrast, suggest that the overall material throughput of the economy, in addition to the wastes it emits to air, sea and land, need to be greatly reduced. While environmental economics suggests that market-based instruments would be an efficient means of achieving both resource and environmental objectives, there are in fact many reasons, revealed by Public Choice analysis, why these are not implemented. Notwithstanding, it seems likely that, to address the pressing resource and environmental challenges facing humanity, policies will need to be implemented at both the international and national levels. This paper suggests that existing climate policy, based on international targets and national policies to meet them, could be supplemented by a similar policy on resource use, involving: either a global level of taxation to meet resource use targets, with transfers to poorer countries to aid their resource-efficient development; or a global resource permit trading scheme, with diminishing resource allowances over time. The latter could begin with a small group of larger, industrialised countries, which encouraged others to join the group by imposing taxes on imports from non-members equivalent to their own self-imposed resource surcharges. Coupled to a regime of Sustainable Commodity Agreements, to promote environmentally sound resource extraction, such a system could lead over time to the globally sustainable development which has as yet quite eluded the global community.

Keywords

Environmental Policy Climate Policy Environmental Taxis Emission Trading System Tradable Permit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aidt T (1998) Political internalisation of economic externalities and environmental policy. J Public Econ 69:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aidt T (2009/10) Green taxes: refunding rules and lobbying. J Environ Econ Manag 60(1):31–43Google Scholar
  3. Ayres RU, Knees AV (1969) Production, consumption, and externalities. Am Econ Rev 59(3):282–297Google Scholar
  4. Ayres RU (2008) Sustainability economics: where do we stand? Ecol Econ 67(3):281–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumol WJ, Oates EO (1998) The theory of environmental policy, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Binswanger HC (1980) Modell einer umweltkonformen Marktwirtschaft – ein Weg zum qualitativen Wachstum. In: Küng E (ed) Wandlungen in Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Festschrift für W. A. Jöhr. Mohr, Tübingen, pp 201–211Google Scholar
  7. Buchanan JM, Tullock G (1975) Polluters’ profits and political response: direct controls versus taxes. Am Econ Rev 65:139–147Google Scholar
  8. Congleton RD (1995) Return to Rio: on the political economy of environmental treaties. Universität Konstanz. Diskussionsbeiträge des SFB 178, Nr. 280, Serie 11Google Scholar
  9. Costanza R (1991) Assuring sustainability of ecological economic systems. In: Costanza R (ed) Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 331–341Google Scholar
  10. Daly HE (1991) Elements of environmental macroeconomics. In: Costanza R (ed) Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 32–46Google Scholar
  11. Daly HE (1992) From empty world to full world economics. In: Goodland R, Daly HE, Serafy SE (eds) Population, technology and lifestyle: the transition to sustainability. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Daly HE (1996) Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development. Beacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. DEFRA (2008) DEFRA information bulletin 135/08, of 8 May 2008Google Scholar
  14. Dewees DN (1983) Instrument choice in environmental policy. Econ Inq 21:53–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diamond J (2005) Collapse: how societies choose or fail to survive. Viking Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Ekins P (2000) Economic growth and environmental sustainability: the prospects for green growth. Routledge, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Ekins P (2001) Key issues in environmental economics. In: van Ierland E, van der Straaten J, Vollebergh H (eds) Economic growth and valuation of the environment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 90–133Google Scholar
  18. Ekins P (2003) Sustainable development. In: Proops J, Page E (eds) Environmental thought. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 144–172Google Scholar
  19. Ekins P, Vanner R (2009) Reducing the impacts of the production and trade of commodities. In: Ekins P, Voituriez T (eds) Trade, globalization and sustainability impact assessment. Earthscan, London, pp 277–308Google Scholar
  20. Flachsland C, Edenhofer O, Jakob M, Steckel J (2008) Developing the international carbon market. Linking options for the EU ETS. Report to the Policy Planning Staff in the Federal Foreign Office, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  21. Fleming D (2007) Energy and the common purpose: descending the energy staircase with tradable energy quotas (TEQs), 3rd edn. The Lean Economy Connection, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Frey BS (1992) Umweltökonomie, 3rd edn. Vandenhoeck, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  23. Frey BS, Schneider F (1978a) An empirical study of politico-economic interaction in the United States. Rev Econ Stat 60:174–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frey BS, Schneider F (1978b) A politico-economic model of the United Kingdom. Econ J 88:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frey BS, Schneider F (1979) An econometric model with an endogenous government sector. Public Choice 34:29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gawel E (1994) Umweltpolitik zwischen Verrechtlichung und Ökonomisierung. ORDO 45:63–103Google Scholar
  27. Gawel E (1995) Bürokratie, Theorie und Umweltverwaltung: Ökonomische Einsichten in verwaltungsrechtliches Handeln im Umweltschutz. Zeitschrifit für angewandte Umweltforschung 8:79–89Google Scholar
  28. Giljum S, Behrens A, Hinterberger F, Lutz C, Meyer B (2008) Modelling scenarios towards a sustainable use of natural resources in Europe. Environ Sci Policy 11:204–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goodland R (1992) The case that the world has reached limits. In: Goodland R, Daly HE, Serafy SE (eds) Population, technology and lifestyle: the transition to sustainability. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 3–22Google Scholar
  30. Haucap J, Kirstein R (2002) Government incentives, when pollution permits durable goods. Public Choice 145(3):1020–1041Google Scholar
  31. Haucap J, Kirstein R (2003) Government incentives when pollution permits are durable goods. Public Choice 115:163–183Google Scholar
  32. Helbig J, Volkert J (1999) Freiwillige Standards im Umweltschutz. Physiker/Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hibbs DA (1977) Political parties and macroeconomic policy. Am Polit Sci Rev 71(4):1467–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hibbs DA (1992) Partisan theory after 15 years. Eur J Polit Econ 8(4):361–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Horbach J (1992) Neue politische Ökonomie und Umweltpolitik. Fischer, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  36. Hueting R (1980) New scarcity and economic growth. North Holland, Amsterdam (Dutch edition first published 1974)Google Scholar
  37. Hueting R (1992) The economic functions of the environment. In: Ekins P, Max-Neef M (eds) Real-life economics: understanding wealth creation. Routledge, London/New York, pp 61–69Google Scholar
  38. Huxham M, Sumner D (1999) Emotion, science and rationality: the case of the Brent Spar. Environ Values 8:349–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. IMAS (1996) Umfrageberichte von IMAS-International. IMAS-International, Linz (Austria)Google Scholar
  40. IMAS (2000) Umfrageberichte von IMAS International. IMAS-International, Linz (Austria)Google Scholar
  41. IMAS (2005) Umfrageberichte von IMAS International. IMAS-International, Linz (Austria)Google Scholar
  42. IMAS (2007) Umfrageberichte von IMAS International. IMAS-International, Linz (Austria)Google Scholar
  43. Josko W, Schmalensee PLR (1998) The political economy of market based environmental policy: the U.S. acid rain programme. J Law Econ 41(1):37–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Josko W, Schmalensee PLR, Bailey EM (1998) The market for sulfurdioxide-emissions. Am Econ Rev 88(4):669–685Google Scholar
  45. Kirchgässner G (1994) Nationale und internationale Bestimmungsfaktoren der schweizerischen Mineralölpreise: Eine Anwendung der Kointegrationsanalyse. Schweizerische Zeitschrifit für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik 130:575–598Google Scholar
  46. Kirchgässner G (1998) Ökologische Steuerreform: Utopie oder realistische Alternative. In: Krause-Junk G (ed) Steuersysteme der Zukunft. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp 279–319Google Scholar
  47. Kirchgässner G (2000) Die Bedeutung moralischen Handelns für die Umweltpolitik. GAiA 9:41–49Google Scholar
  48. Kirchgässner G, Kübler K (1992) Symmetric or asymmetric price adjustment in the oil market: an empirical analysis of the relations between international and domestic prices in the Federal Republic of Germany, 1972–1989. Energy Econ 14:171–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kirchgässner G, Schneider F (2003) On the political economy of environmental policy. Public Choice 115(4):369–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kirchgässner G, Müller U, Savioz MR (1998) Ecological tax reform and involuntary unemployment: simulation results for Switzerland. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik 134:329–353Google Scholar
  51. Kollmann A, Schneider F (2010) Why does environmental policy in representative democracies tend to be in equate? A preliminary public choice analysis. Sustainability 2010(2):3710–3734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Köschel H, Wünsche A, Eckerle T (1999) Was bringt die ökologische Steuerreform der deutschen Wirtschaft? ZEW Konjunkturreport 2(1):6–9Google Scholar
  53. Kuuluvainen J, Tahvonen O (1995) The economics of natural resource utilization. In: Folmer H, Landis Gabel H, Opschoor H (eds) Principles of environmental and resource economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 106–135Google Scholar
  54. Lutz C, Meyer B (2009) Environmental and economic effects of post-Kyoto carbon regimes. Results of simulations with the global model GINFORS. Energy Policy 37(5):1758–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lutz C, Meyer B, Wolter MI (2010) The global multisector/multicountry 3E-Model GINFORS. A description of the model and a baseline forecast for global energy demand and CO2-emissions. Int J Global Environ Issues 10(1–2):25–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Maier-Rigaud G (1996) Für eine ökologische Wirtschaftsordnung. In: Altner G, Mettler-von Meibom B, Simonis UE (eds) Jahrbuch für Ökologie 1996. C.H. Beck Verlag, München, pp 71–79Google Scholar
  57. OECD (1997) Environmental policies and employment, Paris 1997Google Scholar
  58. Olmstead SM, Stavins RN (2006) An international policy architecture for the post-Kyoto era. Am Econ Rev 96:35–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ott WE, Sachs W (2000) Ethical aspects of emissions trading. Wuppertal Pap 110:4–21Google Scholar
  60. Pearce D, Turner RK (1990) Economics of natural resources and the environment. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel HempsteadGoogle Scholar
  61. Reid A, Miedzinski M (2008) EUROPE INNOVA. Final report for the EU sectoral innovation watch panel on eco-innovation. www.europe-innova.org
  62. Schmidt- Bleek F (2007) Nutzen wir die Erde richtig? Von der Arbeit des Menschen und den Leistungen der Natur. Fischer, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  63. Schmidt-Bleek F (2009) The earth: natural resources and human intervention. Haus Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Schneider F (1998) Induzieren ökologische Steuerreformen einen Lenkungseffekt oder nur volle Staatskassen? IAW-Mitteilungen 26Google Scholar
  65. Schneider F, Stiglbauer AM (1995) Makroökonomische Auswirkungen verschiedener Energiesteuermodelle in Österreich. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter 42:121–126Google Scholar
  66. Scholz CM (2000) Environmental tax reforms and the double dividend: a theoretical and empirical analysis for Germany. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  67. Solow R (1974) The economics of resources or the resources of economics. Am Econ Rev 64(2):1–14Google Scholar
  68. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change. The Stern review. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  69. Stern N (2008) The economics of climate change. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 98(2):1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Svendsen GT (1999) U.S. interest groups prefer emission trading: a new perspective. Public Choice 101:109–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zimmermann KW (1996) Zur politischen Ökonomie von Ökosteuern. ORDO 47:169–194Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Ekins
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bernd Meyer
    • 2
  • Friedrich Schmidt-Bleek
    • 3
  • Friedrich Schneider
    • 4
  1. 1.UCL Energy InstituteUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftliche Strukturforschung mbHOsnabrückGermany
  3. 3.Factor 10 InstituteBerlinGermany
  4. 4.Department of EconomicsJohannes Kepler University LinzLinzAustria

Personalised recommendations