Advertisement

Factor X pp 193-216 | Cite as

Business Models for Material Efficiency Services

  • Minna HalmeEmail author
  • Markku Anttonen
  • Mika Kuisma
Chapter
  • 753 Downloads
Part of the Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science book series (ECOE, volume 29)

Abstract

Despite the broad recognition of the need for decoupling the material use and the economic development, enterprises are still not using all the opportunities for material efficiency improvements. This chapter proposes material efficiency services as one solution. It also introduces a conceptual framework for analyzing business models of eco-efficient services and applies this framework to material efficiency services. Four business models are outlined and their feasibility is studied from an empirical vantage point, with special emphasis on the financial aspects. Depending on the business model, prominent material efficiency service providers range from large companies with variety of products and/or services to smaller, specialized ones. Typical potential clients for these services are firms that lack the resources to conduct material efficiency improvements themselves. Customers are more likely to use material efficiency services that relate to auxiliary materials or side-streams rather than those that relate to their core business. Potential client organizations with a strategy of outsourcing support activities and with experience of outsourcing are keener to use material efficiency services.

Keywords

Service Provider Business Model Management Service Material Efficiency Safety Data Sheet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. AGA Gas (2010) SISOURCE® chemical management services. Retrieved 10 Mar 2010, from http://www.aga.se/international/web/lg/se/likelgagase.nsf/docbyalias/newbusiness_sisource
  2. Anttonen M (2010) Greening from the front to the back door? A typology of chemical and resource management services. Bus Strategy Environ 19(3):199–215Google Scholar
  3. Anttonen M, Kuisma M, Halme M (2006) Materiaalitehokkuutta edistävistä palveluista ympäristömyötäistä liiketoimintaa ja asiakaskumppanuuksia (MASCO2) [Generating business and creating business partnerships out of material efficiency services]. http://www.hse.fi/MASCO
  4. Bertoldi P, Rezessy S, Vine E (2006) Energy service companies in European countries: current status and a strategy to foster their development. Energy Policy 34(14):1818–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bierma T, Waterstraat F (1999) Cleaner production from chemical suppliers: understanding shared savings contract. J Cleaner Prod 7(2):145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bierma T, Waterstraat F (2000) Chemical management: reducing waste and cost through innovative supply strategies. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Bleischwitz R (2003) Cognitive and institutional perspectives of eco-efficiency. Ecol Econ 46(3):453–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bressers H, Bruijn T (2005) Conditions for the success of negotiated agreements: partnerships for environmental improvement in the Netherlands. Bus Strategy Environ 14(4):241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corbett CJ, DeCroix GA (2001) Shared-savings contracts for indirect materials in supply chains: channel profits and environmental impacts. Manag Sci 47(7):881–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CSP (2004) Chemical management services. Industry report 2004. Chemical Strategies Partnership, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  11. CSP (2006) What is CMS? Chemical Strategies Partnership. Retrieved 10 Feb 2006, from http://www.chemicalstrategies.org/mission_and_goals.htm
  12. CSP (2009) Chemical management services. Industry report 2009. Chemical Strategies Partnership, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  13. Danish EPA (2003) The Danish green accounts: experiences and internal effects. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved 21 Feb 2006, from http://www.mst.dk/indu/05050000.htm
  14. Delmas M, Terlaak A (2001) A framework for analyzing environmental voluntary agreements. Calif Manag Rev 43(3):44–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deloitte (2006) The service revolution in global manufacturing industries. Deloitte Research 24:23–33. Available at http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/US_deloittereview_The_Service_Revolution_aug07.pdf. Visited latest in 4 Nov 2013
  16. Economist (2000) In search of Fiat’s soul. The Economist, 1 June 2000, pp 69–70Google Scholar
  17. Ekins P (2005) Eco-efficiency: motives, drivers, and economic implications. J Ind Ecol 9(4):12–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. EPA (2006) WasteWise resource management: innovative solid waste contracting methods. Retrieved 10 Mar 2010, from http://www.epa.gov/osw/partnerships/wastewise/wrr/rm.htm
  19. EPA (2009) “Green Servicizing” for a more sustainable US Economy: key concepts, tools and analyses to inform policy engagement. Retrieved 10 Mar 2010, from http://www.epa.gov/waste/partnerships/stewardship/docs/green-service.pdf
  20. European Commission (2002) Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme. Retrieved 21 Feb 2006, from http://europa.eu.int/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&type_doc=Decision&an_doc=2002&nu_doc=1600&lg=en
  21. European Commission (2008) Promoting innovative business models with environmental benefits, Final report November 2008. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/innovation_technology/pdf/nbm_report.pdf
  22. Halme M, Heino E, Anttonen M, Kuisma M, Kontoniemi N (2005) Materiaalinsäästöpalveluista liiketoimintaa – Kohti jätteiden synnyn ehkäisyä [Generating business out of] material efficiency services – towards source prevention. Suomen Ympäristö, 767. http://www.ymparisto.fi/download.asp?contentid=37553&lan=fi
  23. Hamel G (2000) Leading the revolution. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  24. Hansen S (2002) Manual for intelligent energy services. Marcel Dekker Incorporated, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Hardgroves K, Smith M (eds) (2005) The natural advantage of nations. Business opportunities, innovation and governance in the 21st century. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Heiskanen E, Jalas M (2003) Can services lead to radical eco-efficiency improvements? – A review of the debate and evidence. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 10(4):186–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hinterberger F, Luks F, Schmidt-Bleek F (1997) Material flows vs. ‘natural capital’: what makes an economy sustainable? Ecol Econ 23(1):1–14Google Scholar
  28. Hockerts K (1999) Innovation of eco-efficient services: increasing the efficiency of products and services. In: Charter M, Polonsky J (eds) Greener marketing: a global perspective on greening marketing practice. Greenleaf Publishing, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  29. Jakl T, Schwager P (eds) (2008) Chemical leasing goes global: selling services instead of barrels: a win-win business model for environment and industry. Springer, WienGoogle Scholar
  30. Jakl T, Joas R, Nolte RF, Schott R, Windsperger A (2004) Chemical leasing: an intelligent and integrated business model with a view to sustainable development in materials management. Springer, WienGoogle Scholar
  31. Jokinen V (2005) Pääkaupunkiseudun palvelujen sekajätteen määrä. Toimistot, sairaalat, koulut, ravintolat ja hotellit sekä kaupat [Mixed waste generated by service industries in the Helsinki metropolitan area: offices, hospitals, schools, restaurants, hotels and grocery shops]. Pääkaupunkiseudun julkaisusarja, C 2005:1. Retrieved 21 Feb 2006, from http://www.ytv.fi/FIN/tietoa_ytv/julkaisusarja/2005/
  32. Kautto P, Melanen M, Saarikoski H, Ilomäki M, Yli-Kauppila H (2000) Suomen jätepolitiikan ohjauskeinot: vaikutukset, vaikuttavuus ja kehittämistarpeet [Waste policy instruments in Finland – effects, effectiveness and development needs]. Suomen ympäristö 430. http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?contentid=91921&lan=fi
  33. Kircherer A, Schaltegger S, Tschohohei H, Ferreira Pozo B (2007) Eco-efficiency. Combining life cycle assessment and life cycle costs via normalization. Int J Life Cycle Manag 12(7):537–543Google Scholar
  34. Kontoniemi N (2004) Materiaalinsäästöpalvelun mahdollisuudet elintarviketeollisuudessa [Material saving services as business in the food Industry]. Master’s thesis, Helsinki School of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  35. Kortman J, Theodori D, van Ewijk H, Verspeek F, Uitzinger J, La Roca F, Ferrer G, Esteve E, Gensch C-O, Dietlinde Q (2007) Chemical product services in the European Union. European Commission Directorate-General, Joint Research Centre – Joint Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Retrieved 5 May 2007, from http://www.resourcesaver.org/file/toolmanager/CustomO16C45F70883.pdf
  36. Ligon P, Votta T (2001) Strategic contracting increases waste prevention and materials recycling. Resour Recycl: N Am Recycl Compost J: 1–4. Retrieved 21 Feb 2006, from http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/reduce/wstewise/pubs/rr_rm.pdf
  37. Ligon P, Mishra PN, Votta T (2000) New paradigm for disposal contracts: waste service providers become resource managers. BioCycle: J Compost Org Recycl:51–52. Retrieved 21 Feb 2006, from http://www.jgpress.com/BCArticles/2000/040051B.html
  38. Magretta J (2002) Why business models matter? Harv Bus Rev 80(5):86–92Google Scholar
  39. Mont O, Singhal P, Fadeeva Z (2006) Chemical management services in Sweden and Europe – lesson for the future. J Ind Ecol 10(1–2):279–292Google Scholar
  40. Motiva (2000) ESCO-toiminnan yleisperiaatteet ja MotivaESCO-konsepti [General principles of ESCO activity and the MotivaESCO concept]. Motiva publications, 3. Helsinki Centre for Energy ConservationGoogle Scholar
  41. NAESCO (2006) What is an ESCO? National Association of Energy Service Companies. Retrieved 15 Feb 2006, from www.naesco.org/about/esco.htm
  42. Nidumolu R, Prhalad CK, Rangaswami MR (2009) Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation? Harv Bus Rev 87(9):56–64Google Scholar
  43. Normann R, Ramirez R (1994) Designing interactive strategy: from value chain to value constellation. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  44. OECD (2002) Working together towards sustainable development: the OECD experience. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  45. OECD (2003) Voluntary approaches for environmental policy. Effectiveness, efficiency and usage in policy mixes. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  46. OECD (2004) Strategies in chemicals industry and related areas. OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications. Series on Risk Management, 17. In: Workshop on experiences and perspectives of service-oriented strategies in the chemicals industry and related areas, Vienna, Austria, November 2003Google Scholar
  47. Oldham J, Votta T (2003) Chemical management services – greening the supply chain. Greener Manag Int 41(1):89–100Google Scholar
  48. Oliva R, Kallenberg R (2003) Managing the transition from products to services. Int J Service Ind Manag 14(2):160–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Parviainen J (2004) Energiansäästöpalveluiden rahoitukselliset ratkaisut ja niiden hyödynnettävyys materiaalinsäästöpalvelu-liiketoiminnan kannalta [Finance solutions for energy efficiency services and their applicability in materials efficiency business]. Master’s thesis, Helsinki School of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  50. Phillips PS, Gronow B, Read AD (1998) A regional perspective on waste minimisation: a case study of the East Midlands of England. Resour Conserv Recycl 23(3):127–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Porter M, van der Linde C (1995) Green and competitive: breaking the stalemate. Harv Bus Rev 73(5):120–134Google Scholar
  52. Räsänen K (2001) Kehittyvä liiketoiminta: Haaste tulevaisuuden osaajille [Business in development: Challenging capabilities]. Weilin & Göös, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  53. Reiskin E, Kauffman Johnson J, Votta T (2000) Servicizing the chemical supply chain. J Ind Ecol 3(2):19–31Google Scholar
  54. Roy R (2000) Sustainable product-service systems. Futures 32(3–4):289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saling P, Kicherer A, Dittrich-Krämer B, Wittlinger R, Zombik W, Schmidt I, Schrott W, Schmidt S (2002) Eco-efficiency analysis by BASF: the method. Int J Life Cycle Manag 7(4):203–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saling P, Grosse-Sommer A, Alba-Peréz A, Kölch D (2007) Using the eco-efficiency analysis and SEEbalance in the sustainability assessment of products and processes. Presentation given in the 4th BMBF-Forum for Sustainability: Sustainable Neighborhood – from Lisbon to Leipzig through Research (L2L), LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmidt-Bleek F (1998) Luonnon uusi laskuoppi: Ekotehokkuuden mittari MIPS [Das MIPS-Konzept. Weniger Naturverbrauch – mehr Lebensqualität durch Faktor 10]. Gaudeamus, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  58. Stoughton M, Votta T (2003) Implementing service-based chemical procurement: lessons and results. J Cleaner Prod 11(8):839–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tellus Institute (2002) Assessing the potential for resource management in Clark County, Nevada. A report prepared for US EPA Region IX. Retrieved 15 Feb 2006, from http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/reduce/wstewise/pubs/clarkrm.pdf
  60. Tempelman E (ed) (2004) SusProNet report. PSS for need area food: an overview. Retrieved 15 Feb 2006, from http://www.suspronet.org/fs_reports.htm
  61. ten Brink P (ed) (2002) Voluntary environmental agreements: process, practice and future use. Greenleaf Publishing, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  62. Timmers P (1999) Electronic commerce: strategies and models for business-to-business trading. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  63. Tukker A (2004) Eight types of product-service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Bus Strategy Environ 13(4):246–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tukker A, van Halen C (2003) Innovation scan for product service systems. Retrieved 11 June 2005, from http://www.suspronet.org/
  65. UN (2002) Report of the World Summit on sustainable development. United Nations, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 Aug–4 SeptGoogle Scholar
  66. Upstream (2006) Customized services. Retrieved 7 Dec 2006, from http://www.wmupstream.com/customized/resource.asp
  67. Vercalsteren A, Gerken T (2004) Suspronet report WP11: need area households. Retrieved 15 Feb 2006, from http://www.suspronet.org/fs_reports.htm
  68. Viljakainen S (2004) Materiaalinsäästö paperiteollisuudessa – materiaalinsäästöpalvelu apuvälineenä [Materials savings in the paper industry: materials efficiency services as a tool]. Master’s thesis, University of HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  69. Vine E (2005) An international survey of the energy service company (ESCO) industry. Energy Policy 33(5):691–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Von Weizäcker E, Lovins A, Lovins LH (1997) Factor four: doubling wealth, halving resource use. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  71. WM Greensquad (2011) Services. Retrieved 7 Mar 2011, from http://www.wmgreensquad.com/services/waste_reduction/
  72. Wüstenhagen R, Boehnke J (2006) Business models for sustainable energy. In: Munch Andersen M, Tukker A (eds) Perspectives on radical changes to sustainable consumption and production. Proceedings of the SCORE! conference. Retrieved 7 Dec 2006, form http://www.score-network.org
  73. YTV (2006) Jätebenchmarking [Waste benchmarking]. Pääkaupunkiseudun yhteistyövaltuuskunta YTV. Retrieved 15 Jan 2006, from http://www2.ytv.fi/jateh/benchmark/index.html

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and International BusinessAalto University School of BusinessAaltoFinland
  2. 2.Hermai Services , Owner, entrepreneurHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations