Advertisement

Factor X pp 177-191 | Cite as

Establishing and Strengthening Markets for Resource Efficient Products and Services

  • Andreas BurgerEmail author
Chapter
  • 734 Downloads
Part of the Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science book series (ECOE, volume 29)

Abstract

Progress in improving resource efficiency is a precondition for a sustainable development on the national and global scale. At the same time, it is a key factor for competitiveness and welfare in the next decades. A proactive policy is therefore strongly needed to establish and strengthen markets for resource efficient products and services, not only for ecological but also for economic reasons. This paper gives an overview of strategies and instruments that can contribute to meet this challenge effectively. It is based on an analysis of the obstacles on the micro- and macroeconomic level hindering the increase of resource efficiency and shows that coherent, long-term and comprehensive strategies are necessary combining long-term efficiency targets as guardrails for investors and consumers with a reform of the general economic framework, institutional reforms and market specific instruments. The strategies must tackle demand side constraints as well as supply side constraints and promote the development and market diffusion of innovations.

Keywords

Resource Efficiency Public Procurement Environmental Management System Energy Efficiency Measure Venture Capital Fund 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adelphi (2009) EMAS in der Praxis – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage. Studie im Auftrag des BMUGoogle Scholar
  2. Bio Intelligence Service (2011) Implementing EU waste legislation for green growth. Final report prepared for the European Commission DG ENVGoogle Scholar
  3. BMU (2009) Green Tech made in Germany 2.0. Environmental Technology Atlas for Germany, MunichGoogle Scholar
  4. BMU (2012) GreenTech made in Germany 3.0. Environmental Technology Atlas for Germany. www.bmu.de/N49124-1/
  5. Cedefop (2010) Skills for green jobs. European synthesis report. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  6. COM (2005) Commission communication, Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme: a policy framework to strengthen EU manufacturing – towards a more integrated approach for industrial policy, COM (2005) 474 finalGoogle Scholar
  7. COM (2009) European Commission, Directorate General Environment, Bridging the Valley of Death: public support for commercialisation of eco-innovation, Executive SummaryGoogle Scholar
  8. COM (2010) European Commission, National GPP Action Plans (policies and guidelines)Google Scholar
  9. COM (2011) European Commission, Energy Efficiency Plan 2011. Available at: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0109:FIN:EN:PDF
  10. COM (2012a) European Commission, EU environment policy priorities for 2020: towards the seventh EU Environment Action Programme, Consultation documentGoogle Scholar
  11. COM (2012b) European Commission, Exploiting the employment potential of green growth, Commission Staff Working Document, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  12. Distelkamp M, Meyer B, Meyer M (2010) Quantitative und qualitative Analyse der ökonomischen Effekte einer forcierten Ressourceneffizienzstrategie. Ressourceneffizienz Papier 5.5., MaRessProjekt, WuppertalGoogle Scholar
  13. ECORYS (2011) The role of market-based instruments in achieving a resource efficient economy, Rotterdam, October 2011Google Scholar
  14. Federal Statistical Office (2010) Statistisches Jahrbuch 2010 für die Bundesrepublik DeutschlandGoogle Scholar
  15. Friends of Earth (2010) More jobs, less waste – potential for job creation thorough higher rates of recycling in the UK and EU, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. GWS (2011) Macroeconomic modelling of sustainable development and the links between the economy and the environment, Report for the European Commission, DG Environment, Osnabrück. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/studies_modelling/pdf/report_macroeconomic.pdf
  17. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2011)World Energy Outlook 2011, Fact Sheets. http://www.iea.org/publications/worldenergyoutlook/resources/factsheets/
  18. Kristof K, Hennicke P (2010a) Final report on the material efficiency and resource conservation (MaRess) Project, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Resource Efficiency Paper 0.4., WuppertalGoogle Scholar
  19. Kristof K, Hennicke P (2010b) Core strategies for a successful resource policy and the instruments proposed for their effective implementation. Executive summary of the policy recommendations of the MaRess Project, Wuppertal, October 2010Google Scholar
  20. Maibach M, Sieber N, Bertenrath R, Ewringmann D, Koch L, Thöne M, Bickel P (2007) Praktische Anwendung der Methodenkonvention: Möglichkeiten der Berücksichtigung externer Umweltkosten bei Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnungen von öffentlichen Investitionen, UmweltbundesamtGoogle Scholar
  21. Mohaupt F, Konrad W, Kress M, Rebmann K, Schlömer T (2011) Employment effects and needs for vocational training and qualification in the field of energy-saving building refurbishment, Environment, Innovation, Employment Nr. 1/2011. Published by the German Federal Environment Agency and the Federal Ministry of Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, 2011. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/uba-info-medien-e/4148.html
  22. Porter M, van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rennings K (2000) Redefinig innovation – eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol Econ 32:319–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rennings K, Cleff TH (2011) First and second mover strategy options for pioneering countries on environmental markets – from national lead market to combined lead market and lead supplier strategies, Working paper no. 3 within the project: Lead Markets, funded under the BMBF Programme “WIN 2”Google Scholar
  25. Schade W et al (2009) Gesamtwirtschaftliche Wirkungen von Energieeffizienzmaßnahmen in den Bereichen Gebäude, Unternehmen und Verkehr, Umweltbundesamt, Climate change nr. 08/2009Google Scholar
  26. Schmitt M, Schneider M (2010) Kosteneinsparungen durch Ressourceneffizienz in produzierenden Unternehmen. In: UmweltWirtschaftsForumGoogle Scholar
  27. SEC (2011) Impact assessment accompanying the energy efficiency plan, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  28. Strietska-Ilina O, Hofmann C, Haro MD, Jeon S (2011) Skills for green jobs: a global view. Published by the International Labour Organisation and Cedefop. http://www.ilo.org/skills/projects/WCMS_115959/lang--en/index.htm
  29. Sumaila UR, Khan A, Dyck A, Watson R, Munro G, Tyedmers P, Pauly D (2010) A bottom up re-estimation of global fisheries subsidies. J Bioecon 12:201–225Google Scholar
  30. The Association of Sciences in Asia (2011) Towards a sustainable Asia: green transition and innovation. Science Press/Springer, Beijing/HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. UBA (2010) Federal Environment Agency, Environmentally harmful subsidies in Germany – update 2010. http://www.uba.de/uba-info-medien/4123.html
  32. UBA BMU (2011) Report on the environmental economy 2011. Published by the German Federal Environment Agency and the Federal Ministry of Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear SafetyGoogle Scholar
  33. UBA/BMU (2011) Report on the environmental economy 2011. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/uba-info-medien-e/4339.html
  34. UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. A report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/Publications/Decoupling/tabid/56048/Default.aspx
  35. UNEP-FI (2009) United Nations environment programme financial initiative, fiduciary responsibility legal and practical aspects of integrating environmental, social and governance issues into institutional investment. Report by the Asset Management Working Group of the UNEP Finance Initiative, New York, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  36. Waltz R, Krail M, Köhler J, Marscheider-Weidemann F (2011) Towards modeling lead markets in environmental technologies – indicators and modeling approach. Working paper no. 5 within the project: Lead Markets Funded under the BMBF Program “WIN 2”Google Scholar
  37. WBGU (2012) Financing the global energy-system transformation, Policy paper nr. 7, Berlin. http://www.wbgu.de/en/policypaper/policypaper-7/
  38. WEF (2011) The future of long-term investing. A World Economic Forum Report in Collaboration with Oliver Wyman, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal Environment Agency (Germany)Dessau-RoßlauGermany

Personalised recommendations