Abstract
The nature of mathematical reference fields has substantially evolved with the advent of new types of digital technologies enabling students greater access to understanding the use and application of mathematical ideas and procedures. We analyze the evolution of symbolic thinking over time, from static notations to dynamic inscriptions in new technologies. We conclude with new perspectives on Kaput’s theory of notations and representations as mediators of constructive processes.
Originally published in Educational Studies of Mathematics. doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9116-6.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Borba, M. C., & Villarreal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: information and communication technologies, modeling, experimentation and visualization. New York: Springer.
Buchanan, S. (Ed.) (1976). The portable Plato. London: Penguin Books.
Changeux, J. P., & Connes, A. (1998). Conversations on mind, matter and mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 258–277.
Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species: the co-evolution of language and the human brain. New York: Norton.
Demidov, S. S., & Shenitzer, A. (2000). Two letters by N.N. Luzin to M.Ya. Vigodskii. The American Mathematical Monthly, 107(1), 64–82.
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare: the development of human consciousness. New York: Norton.
Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1), 103–131.
Falcade, R., Laborde, C., & Mariotti, M. A. (2007). Approaching functions: Cabri tools as instruments of semiotic mediation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(3), 317–333.
Flegg, G. (1983). Numbers: their history and meaning. New York: Dover.
Hegedus, S., & Kaput, J. (2002). Exploring the phenomena of classroom connectivity. In D. Mewborn, P. Sztajn, D. Y. White, H. G. Wiegel, R. L. Bryant, & K. Nooney (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 422–432). Columbus: ERIC Clearinghouse.
Hegedus, S. J., & Kaput, J. (2003). The effect of SimCalc connected classrooms on students’ algebraic thinking. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education held jointly with the 25th conference of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 47–54). Honolulu: College of Education, University of Hawaii.
Kaput, J. (1999). Representations, inscriptions, descriptions and learning: a kaleidoscope of windows. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 265–281. Special issue on “Representations and the psychology of mathematics education: Part II,” edited by G. Goldin and C. Janvier.
Kaput, J. (2000). Implications of the shift from isolated expensive technology to connected, inexpensive, ubiquitous and diverse technologies. In M. O. J. Thomas (Ed.), Proceedings of the TIME 2000: an international conference on technology in mathematics education (pp. 1–24). Auckland: The University of Auckland and the Auckland University of Technology. Also published in the New Zealand Mathematics Magazine, 38(3), December 2001.
Kaput, J., & Clement, J. (1979). Interpretations of algebraic symbols. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 2, 208.
Kaput, J., Blanton, M., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2008). Algebra from a symbolization point of view. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 19–56). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Kaput, J., Hegedus, S., & Lesh, R. (2007). Technology becoming infrastructural in mathematics education. In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future of mathematics and science (pp. 172–192). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Kline, M. (1980). Mathematics: the loss of certainty. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kozulin, A. (1990). Vygotsky’s psychology: a biography of ideas. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Laborde, C. (2004). The hidden role of diagrams in students’ construction of meaning in geometry. In J. Kilpatrick, C. Hoyles, & O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Meaning in mathematics education (pp. 159–180). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mariotti, M. A. (2000). Introduction to proof: the mediation of a dynamic software environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1–2), 25–53.
Moreno-Armella, L., & Kaput, J. (2005). Aspectos semióticos de la evolución histórica de la arithmética y el álgebra. In M. Alvarado & B. M. Brizuela (Eds.), Haciendo números: las notaciones numéricas vistas desde la psicología, la didáctica y la historia (pp. 31–49). Mexico: Editorial Paidós Mexicana.
Nemirovsky, R., & Tierney, C. (2001). Children creating ways to represent changing situations: on the development of homogeneous spaces. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45(1–3), 67–102.
Nemirovsky, R., Tierney, C., & Wright, T. (1998). Body motion and graphing. Cognition and Instruction, 16(2), 119–172.
Pierpoint, J. (1899). On the arithmetization of mathematics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 5(8), 394–406.
Pea, R. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaboration: convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276.
Roschelle, J. (1996). Designing for cognitive communication: the case of mental models in qualitative physics. In D. L. Day & D. K. Kovacs (Eds.), Computers, communication & mental models (pp. 13–25). London: Taylor & Francis.
Roschelle, J., Kaput, J., & Stroup, W. (2000). SimCalc: Accelerating students’ engagement with the mathematics of change. In M. Jacobson & R. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 47–75). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Rotman, B. (2000). Mathematics as sign. Palo Alto: Standford University Press.
Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1996). How writing came about. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Shaffer, D. W., & Kaput, J. J. (1999). Mathematics and virtual culture: an evolutionary perspective on technology and mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(2), 97–199.
Thom, R. (1973). Modern mathematics: does it exist? In A. G. Howson (Ed.), Development in mathematical education. Proceedings of the second international congress on mathematical education (pp. 159–209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1983). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics (revised ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moreno-Armella, L., Hegedus, S. (2013). From Static to Dynamic Mathematics: Historical and Representational Perspectives. In: Hegedus, S., Roschelle, J. (eds) The SimCalc Vision and Contributions. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5696-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5696-0_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5695-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5696-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)