Abstract
Teaching “well” is seen here not as an engineering problem in which specific practices are located and demonstrated to “work,” but rather as a human endeavor calling upon the whole of the human psyche: behavior, cognition, affect and attention. The construct of different forms of attention as different ways of attending to something is used to analyze data from the chapter by Bishop, in order to shed light on what can happen when students are expected to explain, elaborate, and evaluate for themselves. Other constructs used include metaphor and metonymy, reflection and “taking a reflexive stance” as vital to learning effectively, the ways in which teachers, students and mathematics each mediate in interactions between the other two to form six modes of interaction, and a four-fold structure of activity based on motivational and resource axes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bachelard, G. (1980). La formation de l’esprit scientifique. Paris: J. Vrin. (Original work published in 1938.)
Bennett, J. (1966). The dramatic universe. London: Routledge.
Brentano, F. (1988). Philosophical investigations on space, time and the continuum (trans: B. Smith). Beckenham: Croom Helm. (Original work published in 1940.)
Brousseau, G. (1984). The crucial role of the didactical contract in the analysis and construction of situations in teaching and learning mathematics. In H. Steiner (Ed.), Theory of mathematics education (pp. 110–119). Bielefeld: Institut fur Didaktik der Mathematik der Universitat.
Brousseau, G. (1997) Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: didactiques des mathématiques, 1970–1990 (trans: N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Christiansen, B., & Walther, G. (1986). Task and activity. In B. Christiansen, G. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives in mathematics education (pp. 243–307). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. In D. O. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 153–166). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Dainton, B. (2010). Temporal consciousness. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/consciousness-temporal.
Davis, B. (1996). Teaching mathematics: towards a sound alternative. New York: Ablex.
Davis, J., & Mason, J. (1988). Cognitive and metacognitive shifts. In A. Borbás (Ed.), Proceedings of 12th annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 487–494). Vezprém, Hungary: PME.
diSessa, A. (1993). Many faces of a computational medium: teaching the mathematics of motion. In B. Jaworski (Ed.), Proceedings of the technology in mathematics teaching conference (pp. 23–38). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.
Gray, E., & Tall, D. (1994). Duality, ambiguity, and flexibility: a proceptual view of simple arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 116–140.
Griffin, P. (1989). Teaching takes place in time, learning takes place over time. Mathematics Teaching, 126(1), 12–13.
Hegel, G. (1975). Georg Willhelm Hegel: lectures on the philosophy of world history—an introduction (trans: H. Nisbet). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1840.)
Jakobson, R. (1951). Fundamentals of language (2nd ed.). Den Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
James, W. (1950). Principles of psychology. New York: Dover Publications. (Original work published in 1890.).
Laborde, C. (1989). Audacity and reason: French research in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(3), 31–36.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Love, E., & Mason, J. (1992). Teaching mathematics: action and awareness. Milton Keynes: Open University.
Marton, F., Hounsell, D., & Entwistle, N. (Eds.) (1997). The experience of learning (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic.
Mason, J. (1979). Which medium, which message. Visual Education, (Feb), 29–33.
Mason, J. (1982). Attention. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2(3), 21–23.
Mason, J. (1989). Mathematical abstraction seen as a delicate shift of attention. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 2–8.
Mason, J. (1994). Researching from the inside in mathematics education: locating an I-You relationship. In J. Ponte & J. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of 18th annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 176–194). Lisbon, Portugal: PME.
Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 243–267.
Mason, J. (2002). Mathematics teaching practice: a guide for university and college lecturers. Chichester: Horwood.
Mason, J. (2007). Hyper-learning from hyper-teaching: what might the future hold for learning mathematics from and with electronic screens? Interactive Educational Multimedia, 14, 19–39.
Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2004a). Designing and using mathematical tasks. Milton Keynes: Open University.
Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2004b). Fundamental constructs in mathematics education. London: Routledge.
McNair, K. (1978a). Capturing inflight decisions: thoughts while teaching. Educational Research Quarterly, 3(4), 26–42.
McNair, K. (1978b). Thought and action: a frozen section. Educational Research Quarterly, 3(4), 16–25.
Piaget, J. (2001). Studies in reflecting abstraction (trans: R. Campbell). Hove: Psychology Press. (Original work published in 1977.)
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Schorr, R., & Goldin, G. (2008). Students’ expression of affect in an inner-city SimCalc classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(2), 131–148.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36.
Sfard, A. (1994). Reification as the birth of metaphor. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 44–55.
Sierpinska, A. (1994). Understanding in mathematics. London: Falmer Press.
Simon, M., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: an elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91–104.
Stein, M., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–370). Charlotte: Information Age.
St. Maurice, H. (1991). A guide to commonplaces: on the use of loci in educator’s discourse. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2-3(1), 41–54.
Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169.
Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions, a model of goal and theory description in mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
Treffers, A., & Goffree, F. (1985). Rational analysis of realistic mathematics education: The Wiskobas program. In L. Streefland (Ed.), Proceedings of 9th annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 97–121). Utrecht, The Netherlands: PME
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (1998). Questions and prompts for mathematical thinking. Derby: Association of Teachers of Mathematics (ATM).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mason, J. (2013). You Can Lead a Horse to Water…: Issues in Deepening Learning Through Deepening Teaching. In: Hegedus, S., Roschelle, J. (eds) The SimCalc Vision and Contributions. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5696-0_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5696-0_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5695-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5696-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)