Skip to main content

Concluding Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rational Reconstructions of Modern Physics

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 174))

  • 1484 Accesses

Abstract

In the beginning of the present treatise we discussed the observation that many scientists consider Newton’s classical physics as understandable and intuitive, whereas Modern Physics of the twentieth century is judged as difficult to grasp and unintuitive. This assessment is shared by many physicists and presumably by the majority of philosophers of science. Here, we did not investigate the question why physicists as well as philosophers accept these statements as true – simply since we consider both theses as erroneous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Weingartner (2000), chapter 9.

  2. 2.

    Popper (1963, Appendix, 1972, p.330 ff).

  3. 3.

    Hawking and Ellis (1973).

  4. 4.

    For more details cf. Wheeler (1973).

  5. 5.

    Mittelstaedt (2008).

  6. 6.

    Kuhlmann (2000, 2010).

  7. 7.

    Vollmer (2000, 2007) and the literature quoted in these articles.

References

  • Hawking, S. W., & Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). The large scale structure of space-time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, M. (2000). Processes as objects of quantum field theory. In J. Faye, U. Scheffler, & M. Urchs (Eds.) (Hrg.) Facts, Things and Events, Vol. 76 of Poznan Studies. (pp S. 365–388). Atlanta/GA/USA: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, M. (2010). The ultimate constituents of the material world. Heusenstamm: Ontos-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, P. (2008). Planck’s constant in the light of quantum logic. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 47, 104–113.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge & Keagan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, G. (2000). Was ist Naturalismus? In G. Keil & H. Schnädelbach (Eds.), Naturalismus (pp. 46–67). Frankfurt a. Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, G. (2007). Wie viel Metaphysik brauchen wir? In D. Westerkamp & A. Lühe (Eds.), Metaphysik und Moderne (pp. 67–81). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingartner, P. (2000). Basic questions on truth. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J. A. (1973). From relativity to mutability. In J. Mehra (Ed.), The physicist’s conception of nature (pp. 202–247). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mittelstaedt, P. (2013). Concluding Remarks. In: Rational Reconstructions of Modern Physics. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 174. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5593-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics