Abstract
Classical physics, which is assumed here as represented by classical mechanics, is usually considered as the correct physical theory of our ordinary everyday experience (OE). This experience refers to the dimensions and processes of the human life, to slow motions, to time intervals that are comparable with hours, days, and years etc. and to distances that correspond almost to the dimensions of human beings. The world as we know it through ordinary experience determines what we call intuitive or comprehensible. We do not want to begin by spelling out the meaning of the word “intuitive” and its history. Rather, this concept will find its bearing in ordinary experience (OE), which, as pre-scientific experience, precedes all scientific cognition. This vague sense of intuitive and comprehensible is not only used in popular science but also corresponds largely to the usage of the terms in the literature of modern physics. This does not rule out the possibility that individual physicists interested in fundamental questions have understood these concepts in a deeper sense and in line with the philosophical tradition. Such an interpretation, however, seems initially to have been limited to Quantum Mechanics and will therefore be omitted for the present purpose.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
References
Falkenburg, B. (2006). Functions of intuition in quantum physics. In E. Carson & R. Huber (Eds.), Intuition and the axiomatic method (pp. 267–292). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hentschel, K. (1990). Interpretationen und Fehlinterpretationen der speziellen und allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie durch Zeitgenossen Albert Einsteins. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Huber, R. (2000). Einstein und Poincaré (pp. 267–273). Paderborn: Mentis.
Huber, R. (2006). Intuitive cognition and the formation of theories. In E. Carson & R. Huber (Eds.), Intuition and the axiomatic method (pp. 293–324). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kant, I. (1998). The critique of pure reason. (Guyer, P., & Wood, A. Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, B600.
Könneker, C. (2001). Auflösung der Natur– Auflösung der Geschichte: Moderner Roman Und Ns-“Weltanschauung” im Zeichen der theoretischen Physik. Stuttgart.
Mach, E. (1901). Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung. (4th ed.) English translation: Brockhaus, F. A., Leipzig. (1902) The Science of Mechanics (trans. McCormack,T.J.). Chicago.
Newton, I. (1687). Philosophia Naturalis Principia Mathematica. London: Streator.
Newton, I. (1934). Mathematical principles of natural philosophy. Trans. A. nottc (1729), rev. F. Gajori. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Poincare, H. (1898). La mesure du temps. Revue de metaphysique et de moral, VI, 1–13.
Stachel, J. (1989). Quale cancone cantarono le sirene. In U. Curi (Ed.), L’opera di Einstein (pp. 21–37). Ferrara: Gabriele Corbino & Company.
Vollmer, G. (2000). Was ist Naturalismus? In G. Keil & H. Schnädelbach (Eds.), Naturalismus (pp. 46–67). Frankfurt a. Main: Suhrkamp.
Vollmer, G. (2007). Wie viel Metaphysik brauchen wir? In D. Westerkamp & A. Lühe (Eds.), Metaphysik und Moderne (pp. 67–81). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mittelstaedt, P. (2013). Rise and Fall of Physical Theories. In: Rational Reconstructions of Modern Physics. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 174. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5593-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5593-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5592-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5593-2
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)