Skip to main content

Rise and Fall of Physical Theories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rational Reconstructions of Modern Physics

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 174))

  • 1514 Accesses

Abstract

Classical physics, which is assumed here as represented by classical mechanics, is usually considered as the correct physical theory of our ordinary everyday experience (OE). This experience refers to the dimensions and processes of the human life, to slow motions, to time intervals that are comparable with hours, days, and years etc. and to distances that correspond almost to the dimensions of human beings. The world as we know it through ordinary experience determines what we call intuitive or comprehensible. We do not want to begin by spelling out the meaning of the word “intuitive” and its history. Rather, this concept will find its bearing in ordinary experience (OE), which, as pre-scientific experience, precedes all scientific cognition. This vague sense of intuitive and comprehensible is not only used in popular science but also corresponds largely to the usage of the terms in the literature of modern physics. This does not rule out the possibility that individual physicists interested in fundamental questions have understood these concepts in a deeper sense and in line with the philosophical tradition. Such an interpretation, however, seems initially to have been limited to Quantum Mechanics and will therefore be omitted for the present purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Falkenburg (2006).

  2. 2.

    Huber (2006).

  3. 3.

    Huber (2006) speaks of “sensible intuitive” and “rationally intuitive”.

  4. 4.

    Falkenburg (2006).

  5. 5.

    Newton (1687).

  6. 6.

    Mach (1901).

  7. 7.

    Poincaré (1898).

  8. 8.

    Stachel (1989).

  9. 9.

    Huber (2000).

  10. 10.

    Newton (1934), p. 6.

  11. 11.

    Newton (1934), p. 6.

  12. 12.

    Hentschel (1990), Huber (2000), and Könneker (2001).

  13. 13.

    Vollmer (2000, pp. 46–67, 2007, pp. 67–81).

  14. 14.

    Kant (1998, B599).

References

  • Falkenburg, B. (2006). Functions of intuition in quantum physics. In E. Carson & R. Huber (Eds.), Intuition and the axiomatic method (pp. 267–292). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel, K. (1990). Interpretationen und Fehlinterpretationen der speziellen und allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie durch Zeitgenossen Albert Einsteins. Basel: Birkhäuser.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, R. (2000). Einstein und Poincaré (pp. 267–273). Paderborn: Mentis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, R. (2006). Intuitive cognition and the formation of theories. In E. Carson & R. Huber (Eds.), Intuition and the axiomatic method (pp. 293–324). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1998). The critique of pure reason. (Guyer, P., & Wood, A. Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, B600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Könneker, C. (2001). Auflösung der Natur– Auflösung der Geschichte: Moderner Roman Und Ns-“Weltanschauung” im Zeichen der theoretischen Physik. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E. (1901). Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung. (4th ed.) English translation: Brockhaus, F. A., Leipzig. (1902) The Science of Mechanics (trans. McCormack,T.J.). Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I. (1687). Philosophia Naturalis Principia Mathematica. London: Streator.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I. (1934). Mathematical principles of natural philosophy. Trans. A. nottc (1729), rev. F. Gajori. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincare, H. (1898). La mesure du temps. Revue de metaphysique et de moral, VI, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachel, J. (1989). Quale cancone cantarono le sirene. In U. Curi (Ed.), L’opera di Einstein (pp. 21–37). Ferrara: Gabriele Corbino & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, G. (2000). Was ist Naturalismus? In G. Keil & H. Schnädelbach (Eds.), Naturalismus (pp. 46–67). Frankfurt a. Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, G. (2007). Wie viel Metaphysik brauchen wir? In D. Westerkamp & A. Lühe (Eds.), Metaphysik und Moderne (pp. 67–81). Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mittelstaedt, P. (2013). Rise and Fall of Physical Theories. In: Rational Reconstructions of Modern Physics. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 174. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5593-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics