Skip to main content

A Virtual Selling Agent Which Is Persuasive and Adaptive

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agreement Technologies

Part of the book series: Law, Governance and Technology Series ((LGTS,volume 8))

Abstract

In this paper, we claim that the online selling process can be improved if the experience of the customer is closer to that of one in a retailing store. For this purpose, we provide a virtual selling agent that is persuasive and adaptive. Our persuasive selling agent initiates the dialogue and drives it in order to simultaneously advance two processes: customer profiling and the identification of relevant proposals which are supported by arguments. Moreover, our virtual seller is adaptive since she is able to adjust her behaviour and her arguments according to the customer profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Available online at the following url: http://vvutest.lille1.fr/

References

  • Amgoud, L., Y. Dimopoulos, and P. Moraitis. 2007. A unified and general framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In Proceedings of AAMAS, Honolulu, 963–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P., and J.N. Machon. 2006. La négociation commerciale en pratique. Paris: Eyrolles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delecroix, F., M. Morge, J.C. Routier. 2012a. A virtual selling agent which is proactive and adaptive. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on practical applications of agents and multi-agent systems (PAAMS 12), advances in intelligent and soft-computing, 57–66. Salamanca: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delecroix, F., M. Morge, and J.C. Routier. 2012b. A virtual selling agent which is proactive and adaptive: Demonstration. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on practical applications of agents and multi-agent systems (PAAMS 12), advances in intelligent and soft-computing, 231–236. Salamanca: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faratin, P., C. Sierra, and N.R. Jennings. 1998. Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. International Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24: 3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogg, B.J. 2003. Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Amsterdam/Boston: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, R., and S. Kraus. 2010. Can automated agents proficiently negotiate with humans? Communications of the ACM 53(1): 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTear, M.F. 1993. User modelling for adaptive computer systems: A survey of recent developments. Artificial Intelligence Review 7: 157–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mimoun, M.B., and I. Poncin. 2010. Agents virtuels vendeurs: Que veulent les consommateurs? In Proceedings of the workshop sur les agents conversationnels animés, 99–106. Lille.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montaner, M., B. López, and J.L. De La Rosa. 2003. A taxonomy of recommender agents on the Internet. Artificial Intelligence Review 19: 285–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morge, M., and P. Mancarella. 2010. Assumption-based argumentation for the minimal concession strategy. In Proceedings of ArgMAS 2009, LNCS, vol. 6057, 114–133. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouerdane, W., N. Maudet, and A. Tsoukiàs. 2010. Argumentation theory and decision aiding. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science 142: 177–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paramythis, A., S. Weibelzahl, and J. Masthoff. 2010. Layered evaluation of interactive adaptive systems: Framework and formative methods. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 20(5): 383–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenschein, J.S., and G. Zlotkin. 1994. Rules of encounter: Designing conventions for automated negotiation among Computers, The MIT Press Series of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tintarev, N., and J. Masthoff. 2007. A survey of explanations in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on data engineering workshops, Istanbul, 801–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D., and E. Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in dialogue. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Ubiquitous Virtual Seller (VVU) project that was initiated by the Competitivity Institute on Trading Industries (PICOM). We thanks Bruno Beaufils, Laurent Deslandres, Adrien Nouveau, Isabelle Pialaprat, and the anonymous reviewers for their comments on this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabien Delecroix .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Delecroix, F., Morge, M., Routier, JC. (2013). A Virtual Selling Agent Which Is Persuasive and Adaptive. In: Ossowski, S. (eds) Agreement Technologies. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5582-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5583-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics