Skip to main content

ANTE: Agreement Negotiation in Normative and Trust-Enabled Environments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agreement Technologies

Abstract

The ANTE framework encompasses results of research efforts on three main agreement technology concepts, namely negotiation, normative environments and computational trust. ANTE has been conceived as a general framework with a wide range of applications in mind. This chapter provides an overview of the main guidelines of this project, and explores two application domains for this framework: automated B2B electronic contracting, and disruption management in the context of an airline company operational control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Agreement Negotiation in Normative and Trust-enabled Environments.

  2. 2.

    Multi-Agent System for DIsruption MAnagement.

References

  • Bachmann, R. 2001. Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations. Organization Studies 22(2): 341–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C., and R. Falcone. 2010. Trust theory: A socio-cognitive and computational model, Wiley Series in Agent Technology. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, A., and E. Oliveira. 2011. A new concept for disruption management in airline operations control. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 3(3): 269–290. doi:10.1243/09544100JAERO864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, J., A. Larsen, and J. Larsen. 2005. Disruption management in the airline industry – concepts, models and methods. Technical report, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, DTU, Richard Petersens Plads, Building 321, DK-2800 Kgs, Lyngby. http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/pubdb/p.php?3763.

  • Craswell, R. 2000. Contract law: General theories. In Encyclopedia of law and economics, vol. III, ed. B. Bouckaert and G. De Geest, 1–24. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T.K., Teng, B. 1998. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review 23(3): 491–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, E.W. 1959. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik 1: 269–271.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R.D., and J.W. Webb. 2007. A multi-theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains. Journal of Operations Management 25(2): 482–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonker, C.M., J. Treur. 1999. Formal analysis of models for the dynamics of trust based on experiences. In MultiAgent system engineering, 9th European workshop on modelling autonomous agents in a multi-agent world, 221–231. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josang, A., R. Ismail, C. Boyd. 2007. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems 43(2): 618–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow, L. 2000. General characteristics of rules. In: Encyclopedia of law and economics, vol. Volume V: The economics of crime and litigation, ed. B. Bouckaert and G. De Geest, 502–528. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S., C.Gelatt Jr, M. Vecchi. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598): 671–680.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, N., A. Larsen, J. Larsen, A. Ross, S. Tiourline. 2004. Airline disruption management: Perspectives, experiences and outlook. Technical report CRTR-0407, Carmen Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes Cardoso, H. 2010. Electronic institutions with normative environments for agent-based e-contracting. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade do Porto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes Cardoso, H., and E. Oliveira. 2008. Norm defeasibility in an institutional normative framework. In Proceedings of the 18th European conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI 2008), ed. M. Ghallab, C. Spyropoulos, N. Fakotakis, and N. Avouris, 468–472. Patras: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes Cardoso, H., and E. Oliveira. 2009. A context-based institutional normative environment. In Coordination, organizations, institutions, and norms in agent systems IV, LNAI, vol. 5428, ed. J. Hubner, E. Matson, O. Boissier, V. Dignum, 140–155. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes Cardoso, H., and E. Oliveira. 2010. Directed deadline obligations in agent-based business contracts. In Coordination, organizations, institutions, and norms in agent systems V, LNAI, vol. 6069, ed. J. Padget, A. Artikis, W. Vasconcelos, K. Stathis, V. Torres da Silva, E. Matson, A. Polleres pp. 225–240. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. 1979 Trust and power. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.C., J.H. Davis, and F.D. Schoorman. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review 20(3): 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, J.R. 1986. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning 1: 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, A., H. Lopes Cardoso, and E. Oliveira. 2005. Virtual enterprise integration: Technological and organizational perspectives, chap. Contributions to an electronic institution supporting virtual Enterprises’ life cycle, chapter XI, 229–246. Hershey: Idea Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sako, M. 1998. Does trust improve business performance? In Trust within and between organizations: Conceptual issues and empirical applications, ed. C. Lane and R. Bachmann. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, J., A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2009. Computing confidence values: Does trust dynamics matter? In 14th Portuguese conference on artificial intelligence (EPIA 2009), LNAI, 520–531. Aveiro: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, J., H. Lopes Cardoso, and E. Oliveira. 2010a. Making electronic contracting operational and trustworthy. In 12th Ibero-American conference on artificial intelligence. Bahia Blanca: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, J., A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2010b. Trustworthiness tendency incremental extraction using information gain. In 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology (WI-IAT), Toronto, vol. 2, pp. 411–414. doi:10.1109/WI-IAT.2010.151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, J., A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2011a. A situation-aware computational trust model for selecting partners. Transactions on computational collective intelligence V pp. 84–105. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, J., A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2011b. Trust-based selection of partners. In E-Commerce and web technologies, Lecture notes in business information processing, vol. 85, ed. C. Huemer, T. Setzer, W. Aalst, J. Mylopoulos, M. Rosemann, M.J. Shaw, and C. Szyperski, 221–232. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, J., LH. Lopes Cardoso, E. Oliveira, and A. Rocha. 2012a. Normative and trust-based systems as enabler technologies for automated negotiation. In Negotiation and argumentation in MAS, ed. F. Lopes and H. Coelho. Bentham Science Publishers: Sharjah (United Arab Emirates).

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, J., H. Lopes Cardoso, A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2012b. Trust and normative control in multi-agent systems: An empirical study. In 10th International conference on practical applications of agents and multi-agent systems (PAAMS 2012), Special sessio on trust, incentives and norms in open multi-agent systems (TINMAS). Salamanca: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wathne, K.H., and J.B. Heide. 2000. Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions. The Journal of Marketing 64(4): 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1979. Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics 22: 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), under project PTDC/EIA-EIA/104420/2008, and by QREN under project RESPLAN. The authors would also like to thank Pedro Brandão for his work on the implementation of the ANTE prototype.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrique Lopes Cardoso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cardoso, H.L., Urbano, J., Rocha, A.P., Castro, A.J.M., Oliveira, E. (2013). ANTE: Agreement Negotiation in Normative and Trust-Enabled Environments. In: Ossowski, S. (eds) Agreement Technologies. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5582-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5583-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics