Abstract
The ANTE framework encompasses results of research efforts on three main agreement technology concepts, namely negotiation, normative environments and computational trust. ANTE has been conceived as a general framework with a wide range of applications in mind. This chapter provides an overview of the main guidelines of this project, and explores two application domains for this framework: automated B2B electronic contracting, and disruption management in the context of an airline company operational control.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Agreement Negotiation in Normative and Trust-enabled Environments.
- 2.
Multi-Agent System for DIsruption MAnagement.
References
Bachmann, R. 2001. Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations. Organization Studies 22(2): 341–369.
Castelfranchi, C., and R. Falcone. 2010. Trust theory: A socio-cognitive and computational model, Wiley Series in Agent Technology. Chichester: Wiley.
Castro, A., and E. Oliveira. 2011. A new concept for disruption management in airline operations control. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 3(3): 269–290. doi:10.1243/09544100JAERO864.
Clausen, J., A. Larsen, and J. Larsen. 2005. Disruption management in the airline industry – concepts, models and methods. Technical report, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, DTU, Richard Petersens Plads, Building 321, DK-2800 Kgs, Lyngby. http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/pubdb/p.php?3763.
Craswell, R. 2000. Contract law: General theories. In Encyclopedia of law and economics, vol. III, ed. B. Bouckaert and G. De Geest, 1–24. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Das, T.K., Teng, B. 1998. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review 23(3): 491–512.
Dijkstra, E.W. 1959. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik 1: 269–271.
Ireland, R.D., and J.W. Webb. 2007. A multi-theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains. Journal of Operations Management 25(2): 482–497.
Jonker, C.M., J. Treur. 1999. Formal analysis of models for the dynamics of trust based on experiences. In MultiAgent system engineering, 9th European workshop on modelling autonomous agents in a multi-agent world, 221–231. Berlin: Springer.
Josang, A., R. Ismail, C. Boyd. 2007. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems 43(2): 618–644.
Kaplow, L. 2000. General characteristics of rules. In: Encyclopedia of law and economics, vol. Volume V: The economics of crime and litigation, ed. B. Bouckaert and G. De Geest, 502–528. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kirkpatrick, S., C.Gelatt Jr, M. Vecchi. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598): 671–680.
Kohl, N., A. Larsen, J. Larsen, A. Ross, S. Tiourline. 2004. Airline disruption management: Perspectives, experiences and outlook. Technical report CRTR-0407, Carmen Research.
Lopes Cardoso, H. 2010. Electronic institutions with normative environments for agent-based e-contracting. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade do Porto.
Lopes Cardoso, H., and E. Oliveira. 2008. Norm defeasibility in an institutional normative framework. In Proceedings of the 18th European conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI 2008), ed. M. Ghallab, C. Spyropoulos, N. Fakotakis, and N. Avouris, 468–472. Patras: IOS Press.
Lopes Cardoso, H., and E. Oliveira. 2009. A context-based institutional normative environment. In Coordination, organizations, institutions, and norms in agent systems IV, LNAI, vol. 5428, ed. J. Hubner, E. Matson, O. Boissier, V. Dignum, 140–155. Berlin: Springer.
Lopes Cardoso, H., and E. Oliveira. 2010. Directed deadline obligations in agent-based business contracts. In Coordination, organizations, institutions, and norms in agent systems V, LNAI, vol. 6069, ed. J. Padget, A. Artikis, W. Vasconcelos, K. Stathis, V. Torres da Silva, E. Matson, A. Polleres pp. 225–240. Berlin: Springer.
Luhmann, N. 1979 Trust and power. New York: Wiley.
Mayer, R.C., J.H. Davis, and F.D. Schoorman. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review 20(3): 709–734.
Quinlan, J.R. 1986. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning 1: 81–106.
Rocha, A., H. Lopes Cardoso, and E. Oliveira. 2005. Virtual enterprise integration: Technological and organizational perspectives, chap. Contributions to an electronic institution supporting virtual Enterprises’ life cycle, chapter XI, 229–246. Hershey: Idea Group.
Sako, M. 1998. Does trust improve business performance? In Trust within and between organizations: Conceptual issues and empirical applications, ed. C. Lane and R. Bachmann. New York: Oxford University Press.
Urbano, J., A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2009. Computing confidence values: Does trust dynamics matter? In 14th Portuguese conference on artificial intelligence (EPIA 2009), LNAI, 520–531. Aveiro: Springer.
Urbano, J., H. Lopes Cardoso, and E. Oliveira. 2010a. Making electronic contracting operational and trustworthy. In 12th Ibero-American conference on artificial intelligence. Bahia Blanca: Springer.
Urbano, J., A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2010b. Trustworthiness tendency incremental extraction using information gain. In 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology (WI-IAT), Toronto, vol. 2, pp. 411–414. doi:10.1109/WI-IAT.2010.151.
Urbano, J., A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2011a. A situation-aware computational trust model for selecting partners. Transactions on computational collective intelligence V pp. 84–105. Berlin: Springer.
Urbano, J., A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2011b. Trust-based selection of partners. In E-Commerce and web technologies, Lecture notes in business information processing, vol. 85, ed. C. Huemer, T. Setzer, W. Aalst, J. Mylopoulos, M. Rosemann, M.J. Shaw, and C. Szyperski, 221–232. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Urbano, J., LH. Lopes Cardoso, E. Oliveira, and A. Rocha. 2012a. Normative and trust-based systems as enabler technologies for automated negotiation. In Negotiation and argumentation in MAS, ed. F. Lopes and H. Coelho. Bentham Science Publishers: Sharjah (United Arab Emirates).
Urbano, J., H. Lopes Cardoso, A. Rocha, and E. Oliveira. 2012b. Trust and normative control in multi-agent systems: An empirical study. In 10th International conference on practical applications of agents and multi-agent systems (PAAMS 2012), Special sessio on trust, incentives and norms in open multi-agent systems (TINMAS). Salamanca: Springer.
Wathne, K.H., and J.B. Heide. 2000. Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions. The Journal of Marketing 64(4): 36–51.
Williamson, O.E. 1979. Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics 22: 233–261.
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), under project PTDC/EIA-EIA/104420/2008, and by QREN under project RESPLAN. The authors would also like to thank Pedro Brandão for his work on the implementation of the ANTE prototype.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cardoso, H.L., Urbano, J., Rocha, A.P., Castro, A.J.M., Oliveira, E. (2013). ANTE: Agreement Negotiation in Normative and Trust-Enabled Environments. In: Ossowski, S. (eds) Agreement Technologies. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5582-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5583-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)