Abstract
While there has been a large body of negotiation literature in both Behavioral Science (behavioral) and Artificial Intelligence/Game Theory (computational) communities, there has not been an attempt to bridge the two communities to our best knowledge. In this chapter, we compare and contrast the characteristics of behavioral and computational literature in negotiation. We propose that incorporating the strengths of two types of literature are valuable in expanding the horizon of research outlook.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, C., & Shirako, A. (2008). Are individuals reputations related to their history of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 320–333.
Bac, M., & Raff, H. (1996). Note: Issue-by-issue negotiations: The role of information and time preference. Games and Economic Behavior, 13, 125–134.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
Barry, B., & Oliver, L. (1996). Affect in dyadic negotiation: A model and propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 127–143.
Balakrishnan, P. V., & Eliashberg, J. (1995). An analytical process model of two-party negotiation. JehoshuaManagement Science, 41(2), 226–243.
Bensaid, B., & Gary-Bobo, R. J. (1996). An exact formula for the lion’s share: A model for preplay negotiation. Games and Economic Behavior, 14, 44–148.
Bolton, G. E., Chatterjee, K., & McGinn, K. L. (2003). How communication links influence coalition bargaining: A laboratory investigation. Management Science, 49(5), 583–598.
Braun, P., Brzostowski, J., Kersten G., Kim, J. B., Kowalczyk, R., Strecker, S., et al. (2006). e-Negotiation systems and software agents: Methods, models and applications. In Intelligent decision-making support systems (pp. 271–300). London: Springer.
Busch, L-A., & Horstmann, I. J. (2002). The game of negotiations: Ordering issues and implementing agreements. Games and Economic Behavior, 41, 169–191.
Curhan, J. R., Elfenbein, H., & Xu, H. (2006). What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 493–512.
De Drue, C., Weingart, L., & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 889–905.
Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of competition and cooperation. Human Relations, 2, 199–231.
Druckman, D. (1986). Stages, turning points and crises: Negotiating military base rights, Spain and the United States. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 327–360.
Faratin, P., Sierra, C., & Jennings, N. R. (2002). Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artificial Intelligence, 142, 205–237.
Fatima, S. S., Woodldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (2004). An agenda-based framework for multi-issue negotiation. Artificial Intelligence, 152, 1–45.
Forgas, J. (1998). On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 129–151.
Hanaki, N., Peterhansl, A., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2007). Cooperation in evolving social networks. Management Science, 53(7), 1036–1050.
Kersten, G. E., Michalowski, W., Szpakowicz, S., & Koperczak, Z. (1991). Restructurable representations of negotiations. Management Science, 37(10), 1269–1290.
Kraus, S. (1997). Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments. Artificial Intelligence, 94, 79–97.
Kraus, S., Wilkenfeld, J., & Zlotkin, G. (1995). Multiagent negotiation under time constraints. Artificial Intelligence, 75, 297–345.
Kraus, S., Sycara, K., & Evanchik. (1998). Argumentation in negotiation: A formal model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 104(1–2), 1–69.
Kraus, S., Hoz-Weiss, P., Wilkenfeld, J., Andersen, D. R., & Pate, A. (2008). Resolving crises through automated bilateral negotiations. Artificial Intelligence, 172, 1–18.
Kumar, R. (1997). The role of affect in negotiations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33, 84–100.
Lai, G., & Sycara, K. (2008). A generic framework for automated multi-attribute negotiation, group decision and negotiation. doi:10.1007/s10726-008-9119-9, ISSN 0926-2644 (Print) 1572-9907 (Online).
Lai, G., Li, C., Sycara, K., & Giampapa, J. (2004). Literature review on multi-attribute negotiations. Technical report. Pittsburgh, PA: Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
Lai, G., Li, C., & Sycara, K. (2006). Efficient multi-attribute negotiation with incomplete information. The Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(5), 511–528.
Lai, G., Sycara, K., & Li, C. (2008). A decentralized model for automated multi-attribute negotiations with incomplete information and general utility functions. Journal of Multi Agent and Grid Systems, 4(1), 39–57.
Lange, A., & Vogt, C. (2003). Cooperation in international environments due to a preference for equity. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2049–2067.
Laruelle, A., & Valenciano, F. (2009). Cooperative bargaining foundations of the Shaply-Shubik index. Games and Economic Behavior, 65, 242–255.
Li, C., Giampapa, J., Sycara, K. (2006). Bilateral contract negotiation decisions with uncertain dynamic outside options, IEEE systems, man and cybernetics, part C. Special Issue on Game Theoretic Analysis and Stochastic Simulation of Negotiation Agents, 36(1), 1–13.
Lin, R., Kraus, S., Wilkenfeld, J., & Barry, J. (2008). Negotiating with bounded rational agents in environments with incomplete information using an automated agent. Artificial Intelligence, 172, 823–851.
Loewenstein, G., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M. (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 426–441.
Luo, X., Jennings, N. R., Shadbolt, N., Leung, H., & Lee, J. H. (2003). A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral, multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitive environments. Artificial Intelligence, 148, 53–102.
McGinn, K., & Keros, A. (2002). Improvisation and the logic of exchange in socially embedded transactions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 442–473.
Myerson, R. B. (1977). Two-person bargaining problems and comparable utility. Econometrica, 45, 1631–1637.
Nash, J. (1953). Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica, 21, 128–140.
Nicolo, A., & Yu, Y. (2008). Strategic divide and choose. Games and Economic Behavior, 64, 268–289.
O’Neill, B., Samet, D., Wiener, Z., & Winter, E. (2004). Bargaining with an agenda. Games and Economic Behavior, 48, 139–153.
Pruitt, D., & Rubin, J. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate and settlement. New York: Random House.
Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.
Ramchurn, S. D., Sierra, C., Godo, L., & Jennings, N. R. (2007). Negotiation using rewards. Artificial Intelligence, 171, 805–837.
Rangaswamy, A., & Shell, G. R. (1997). Using computers to realize joint gains in negotiations: Toward an “electronic bargaining table”. Management Science, 43(8) 1147–1163.
Rao, A. G., & Shakun, M. F. (1974). A normative model for negotiation. Management Science, 20(10), 1364–1375.
Sebenius, J. K. (1992). Negotiation analysis: A characterization and review. Management Science, 38(1), 18–38.
Sycara, K. (1990). Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. Theory and Decision, 28(3), 203–242.
Sycara, K. P. (1991). Problem restructuring in negotiation. Management Science, 37(10), 1248–1268.
Synder, C., & Higgins, R. (1988). Excuses their effective roles in the negotiation of reality. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 23–45.
Thompson, L. (1998). The mind and heart of the negotiator. New York: Prentice Hall.
Van Kleef, G. A., De Dreu, C., & Manstead, A. (2003). The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on negotiation behavior and outcomes. IACM 15th annual conference. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Van Lange, P. A. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337–349.
Zeng, D., & Sycara, K. (1998). Bayesian learning in negotiation. International Journal of Human-Computers Studies, 48(1), 125–141.
Zlotkin, G., & Jeffrey, S. (1996). Rosenschein. Compromise in negotiation: Exploring worth functions over states. Artificial Intelligence, 84, 151–176.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the ARO Multi University Research Initiative grant W911-NF-0810301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turan, N., Dai, T., Sycara, K., Weingart, L. (2013). Toward a Unified Negotiation Framework: Leveraging Strengths in Behavioral and Computational Communities. In: Sycara, K., Gelfand, M., Abbe, A. (eds) Models for Intercultural Collaboration and Negotiation. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5574-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5574-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5573-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5574-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)