Skip to main content

A Formal Definition of Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Models for Intercultural Collaboration and Negotiation

Part of the book series: Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation ((AGDN,volume 6))

Abstract

Globalization makes culture no more bound to a geographical area, race or religion as was previously considered in anthropology. With the advent of Web 2.0 it becomes appropriate to speak about the culture of online communities in general, without specific ties to country or nation. Multi-national companies, software developers, scientists need to take into account cultural differences when delivering products to people. The first step in dealing with culture consists in defining and representing culture of the targeted community. AI literature addressed issues of sociality, collaboration, and coordination in agent societies, but did not target the problem of defining and representing culture of a community. This chapter presents a formal definition of culture of a set of agents. The proposed definition generalizes existing definitions of culture and it is operational in the sense that it can be applied for characterization and comparison of culture(s) existing in various communities. The main focus of this chapter is on the first version of the formalism that does not introduce states. However, representing a snapshot of the culture in a certain moment is the first step towards a more complex formalism that includes states (the work on the latter is ongoing and we present only preliminary definitions here).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Traits are further grouped in featuresin Axelrod’s formulation, i.e. each feature can take value from a set of specific traits.

  2. 2.

    Of course, we present a simplified example here, real users and groups on CiteULike have much more papers in their bibliographies.

  3. 3.

    For instance, Google Chrome browser includes tabbed browsing from the first release.

References

  • Axelrod, R. (1997). The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(2), 203–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, G., & Peoples, J. (1998). Introduction to cultural anthropology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, W., & Tuomela, R. (2003). Collective intentions and the maintenance of social practices. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 6(1), 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birukou, A., Blanzieri, E., Giorgini, P., & Giunchiglia, F. (2009a). A formal definition of culture of a set of agents. The version without states(Technical Report DISI-09-070). Trento, Italy: University of Trento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birukou, A., Blanzieri, E., Giorgini, P., & Giunchiglia, F. (2009b). A formal definition of culture. In Proceedings of the workshop on modeling intercultural collaboration and negotiation (MICON) at IJCAI’09.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1988). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, A. B. (1992). Strategic intelligence and statecraft: Selected essays. Washington, DC: Brassey’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumann, C. (1999). Writing for culture: Why a successful concept should not be discarded [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 40, S1–S27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. (1991). A theory of group stability. American Sociological Review, 56(3), 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C. (1998). Modelling social action for AI agents. textitArtificial Intelligence, 103(1–2), 157–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieberger, A. (1997). Supporting social navigation on the world wide web. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46, 805–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. L. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, J. (1999). Multi-agent systems: An introduction to distributed artificial intelligence. Harlow, UK: Addison-Wesley Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyne, J., Smyth, B., Coyle, M., Balfe, E., & Briggs, P. (2004). Further experiments on collaborative ranking in community-based web search. Artificial Intelligence Review, 21(3–4), 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1975). Culture, people, nature: An introduction to general anthropology. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. J., & Carroll, G. R. (2006). Culture and demography in organizations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshman, B. R., Carley, K. M., & Kowalchuck, M. J. (2007a). Specifying agents in construct(Technical Report CMU-ISRI-07-107). Pittsburgh, CA: Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshman, B. R., Carley, K. M., & Kowalchuck, M. J. (2007b). Loading networks in construct(Technical Report CMU-ISRI-07-116). Pittsburgh, CA: Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshman, B. R., Birukou, A., Martin, M. K., Bigrigg, M. W., & Carley, K. M. (2008). The impact of educational interventions on real & stylized cities(Technical Report CMU-ISR-08-114). Pittsburgh, CA: Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, D. G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keesing, R. M. (1981). Cultural anthropology: A contemporary perspective. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L., Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Papers of the Peabody Museum, 47, 643–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, R. (1936). The study of man: An introduction. New York: D. Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masolo, C., Vieu, L., Bottazzi, E., Catenacci, C., Ferrario, R., Gangemi, A., et al. (2004). Social roles and their descriptions. In Principles of knowledge representation and reasoning (KR2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • McFate, M. (2005). The military utility of understanding adversary culture. Joint Force Quarterly, 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (2002). Cooperation and competition among primitive peoples. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M., & Métraux, R., (eds.) (1953). The study of culture at a distance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, M. B., Nunn, C. L., & Towner, M. C. (2006). Cultural macroevolution and the transmission of traits. Evolutionary Anthropology, 15(2), 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. (1998). Corporations, culture, and commitment: Motivation and social control in organizations. California Management Review, 31(4), 9–25.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ossowski, S. (1999). Co-ordination in artificial agent societies, social structure and its implications for autonomous problem-solving agents: Vol. 1535. Lecture notes in computer science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1996). Organizational culture and leadership (Jossey-Bass Psychology Series)(2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoham, Y., & Tennenholtz, M. (1995). On social laws for artificial agent societies: Off-line design. Artificial Intelligence, 73(1–2), 231–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoham, Y., & Tennenholtz, M. (1997). On the emergence of social conventions: Modeling, analysis, and simulations. Artificial Intelligence, 94(1–2), 139–166.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tylor, E. B. (1871) Primitive culture. London: J. Murray.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Stefano Borgo for suggestions he provided for improving the formalism.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Blanzieri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Birukou, A., Blanzieri, E., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F. (2013). A Formal Definition of Culture. In: Sycara, K., Gelfand, M., Abbe, A. (eds) Models for Intercultural Collaboration and Negotiation. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5574-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5574-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5573-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5574-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics