Skip to main content

Socio-Economic Machines and Practical Models of Development: The Role of the HDI

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Theoretical and Practical Reason in Economics

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Philosophy ((BRIEFSPHILOSOPH))

  • 1228 Accesses

Abstract

The objectives of this chapter are to characterize the socio-economic machines and to show the entanglement of facts and values in economic instruments like indexes. After presenting the proposal for a normative machine and model of capabilities, the chapter analyzes the role of the HDI in this context. This will serve as an example of how to combine theoretical and practical reason in Economics. It will show that the HDI makes a number of underlying technical and practical assumptions. The conclusion is that the HDI could be a partial model contributing to the construction of a socio-economic normative machine of development, but that it has to be improved. Normative models should include all the relevant arguments and information needed to construct a socio-economic normative machine—which permits the effective work of practical reason in order to accomplish its purpose in each place and situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On this, also see the examples provided by Reiss 2008a.

  2. 2.

    As in the rest of this work the term “practical” is not used here in the sense of pragmatic but of a prudential reason, decision or action.

  3. 3.

    See also Anderson 1993, p. 3.1.

  4. 4.

    Cf. UNDP 1999, p. 23 and Jolly 2005, p. 126.

  5. 5.

    For a review of this criticisms, see Stanton (2007, pp. 16–28) and Bagolin and Comim (2008, p. 17–22).

  6. 6.

    On this topic see also the sharp essay of MacIntyre (1984, Chap. 8

  7. 7.

    They are non-additive qualities: see, e. g., Cohen and Nagle (1934, p. 296).

  8. 8.

    She explains (2001, p. 240): “Index number formulae conceived as measuring instruments are based on the strategy of aggregating in a way that allows each individual element to be assigned its due weight in the whole. Such a “weighted average” strategy provides a solution to a general problem in economics, namely that many concepts refer to aggregates of things which may be considered homogeneous in the dimension of prices or money value, but are nonhomogeneous in another dimension, namely amounts consumed or produced. The solution is to use weights to overcome the problem of how to average in a manner that takes account of both amounts and values.”

  9. 9.

    Scales of measurement in the social and behavioral sciences are nominal or ordinal (Finkelstein 1982, p. 26).

  10. 10.

    These theoretical and practical insights are part of what Harrison calls (2002, p. 37) “outside criteria” needed to operationalize a theory of well-being.

  11. 11.

    For Esposito and Chiappero-Martinetti (2008, p. 3) “the act of not giving weights—equivalent indeed to the assignation of identical weights to each dimension—is itself a subjective decision motivated by the value judgment that those dimensions are equally valuable. (…) In the literature (…) the possible meanings of the statement ‘dimension h is more important than dimension k have not critically been searched for.”

  12. 12.

    Sen (1992, p. 117) asserts: “It is not unreasonable to think that if we try to take note of all the diversities, we might end up in a total mess of empirical confusion. The demands of practice, as well as reasonable normative commitments, indicate discretion and suggest that we disregard some diversities while concentrating in the more important ones.” The task will be to reason and decide which are important and which are not.

  13. 13.

    I recognize the contribution of Mary Morgan concerning this point.

References

  • Alkire S (2002) Valuing freedoms. Sen’s capabilities approach and poverty reduction valuing freedoms. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire S (2007) Choosing dimensions: The capability approach and multidimensional poverty. In: Kakwani N, Silber J (eds) The many dimensions of poverty. Palgrave-MacMillan, New York, pp 89–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire S, Santos ME (2010) Acute multidimensional poverty: a new index for developing countries. Human development research paper 2010/11

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RGD (1951) Statistics for economists. Hutchison, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand S, Amartya S (1994) Human development index: methodology and measurement. Occasional papers, 12, Human development report office, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand S, Sen A (2000) The income component of the human development index. J Hum Dev 1(1):83–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E (1993) Value in ethics and economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabi SH (2010) Well-being: an Islamic approach. Paper presented at the 13th international congress of the association for social economics, Montréal, 28 June–1 July 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics (1954) Translated and introduced by Sir David Ross, Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. Politics (1958) Edited and translated by Ernst Barker. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagolin I, Comim F (2008) Human development index (HDI) and its family of indexes: an evolving critical review. Revista de Economia 34(2):7–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Banzhaf HS (2001) Quantifying the qualitative: quality-adjusted price indexes in the United States, 1915–61. In: Klein JL, Morgan MS (eds) The age of economic measurement, HOPE annual supplement, pp. 345–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Boumans M, Davis J (2009) Economic methodology. Amsterdam School of Economics, History and Methodology Group, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Boumans MJ (2001) Fisher’s instrumental approach to index numbers. In: Klein JL, Morgan MS (eds) The age of economic measurement, HOPE annual supplement, pp. 313–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Boumans MJ (2005) How economists model the world into numbers. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright N (2002) The limits of causal order, from economics to physics. In: Mäki U (ed) Fact and fiction in economics. Models, realism and social construction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 137–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright N (2007) Hunting causes and using them. Approaches in philosophy and economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MR, Nagle E (1934) An introduction to logic and scientific method. Harcourt Brace, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Comim F (2008) Measuring capabilities. In: Comim F, Qizilbash M, Alkire S (eds) The capability approach. Concepts, measures and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 157–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo RF (2012) Practical reasoning in economic affairs: the HD index as a case study. In: Castro Caldas J, Neves V (eds) Facts, values and objectivity in economics. Routledge, Abington and New York, pp. 158–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo RF forthcoming. The increasing role of practical reason in the human development reports. Review of social economy

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JB, Marin SR (2007) Identity and democracy: linking individual and social reasoning. development (2009) 52(4):500–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JB, Solange RM (2007) Identity and democracy: linking individual and social reasoning. Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • De Langhe R (2009) Mainstream economics: searching where the light is. J Post-Keynesian Econ 32/1:137–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières A (2008) L’argument statistique, I. Pour une sociologie historique de la quantification. Presses de l’École des mines, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito L, Chaippero-Martinetti E (2008) Multidimensional poverty measurement: restricted and unrestricted hierarchy among poverty dimensions. Oxford poverty and human development initiative (OPHI) working paper, 22. http://www.ophi.org.uk/pubs/OPHI_WP22.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2010

  • Finkelstein L (1982) Theory and philosophy of measurement. In: Sydenham PH (ed) Handbook of measurement science, vol 1. Wiley, New York, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda-Parr S (2003) The human development paradigm: Operationalizing Sen’s ideas on capabilities. Fem Econ 9(2–3):301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison M (2002) From theory to measurement to policies: operationalising the capability approach to well-being. Measurement in physics and economics discussion paper series 18/02, LSE

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly R (2005) Interview by Thomas Weiss, United Nations Intellectual History Project. http://www.unhistory.org/CD/PDFs/Jolly.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2010

  • Keynes JM (1921) A treatise on probability. MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes JM (1973) The general theory and after: part II. Defence and development, the collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. XIV. MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (1984) The character of generalizations in social science and their lack of predictive power. In: After Virtue, MacIntyre A, University of Notre Dame Press, Indiana, pp 84–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäki U (2011) Models and the locus of their truth. Synthese 180:47–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MS (2001) Making measuring instruments. In: Klein JL, Morgan Mary S (eds) The age of economic measurement, HOPE annual supplement, pp 235–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern O (1963) On the accuracy of economic observations. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum MC (2001) The Protagoras: a science of practical reasoning. In: Millgram E (ed) Varieties of practical reasoning. The MIT Press, Cambridge and London, pp 153–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum MC (2003) Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Fem Econ 9(2-3):33–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plato. Complete Works (1997) Cooper JM, Hutchison DS (eds) Hacket, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • PNUD (Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo) (2009) Aportes para el desarrollo humano en Argentina, Buenos Aires. (http://www.undp.org.ar/docs/Libros_y_Publicaciones/Aportes_desarrollo_humano_2009.pdf). Accessed 2 Nov 2010

  • Porter T (1995) Trust in numbers. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss J (2008) Error in economics. Towards a more evidence-base methodology. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns I (2005b) Selecting capabilities for quality of life measurement. Soc Indic Res 74/1:9–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1992) Inequality reexamined. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (2002) Rationality and freedom. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (2009) The idea of justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton E (2007) The human development index: a history. Working paper series 127, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeten P (1994) Human development: means and ends. Am Econ Rev 84(2):232–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P (2000) Measurement, theory of. In: Concise Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (1990) Human development report 1990. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (1991) Human development report 1991. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (1993) Human development report 1993. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (1999) Human development report 1999. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2009) Human development report 2009. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2010. Human Development Report (2010) The real wealth of nations: pathways to human development. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland W (1996) El individuo y su identificación en el mundo de la contingencia. In La razón y su praxis. Cuatro ensayos filosóficos, 117–46. Buenos Aires: Biblos (Das Individuum und Seine Identifizierung in der Welt der Kontingenz. In: Hoffmann TS, Majestachak S (eds) Denken der Individualität. Festschrift für Josef Simon zum 65 Geburstag, Translated by Alejandro GV, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York pp 3–25)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J (1989) Data and phenomena. Synthese 79(3):393–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo F. Crespo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crespo, R.F. (2013). Socio-Economic Machines and Practical Models of Development: The Role of the HDI. In: Theoretical and Practical Reason in Economics. SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5564-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics