Advertisement

Socio-Economic Machines and Practical Models of Development: The Role of the HDI

  • Ricardo F. CrespoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy book series (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)

Abstract

The objectives of this chapter are to characterize the socio-economic machines and to show the entanglement of facts and values in economic instruments like indexes. After presenting the proposal for a normative machine and model of capabilities, the chapter analyzes the role of the HDI in this context. This will serve as an example of how to combine theoretical and practical reason in Economics. It will show that the HDI makes a number of underlying technical and practical assumptions. The conclusion is that the HDI could be a partial model contributing to the construction of a socio-economic normative machine of development, but that it has to be improved. Normative models should include all the relevant arguments and information needed to construct a socio-economic normative machine—which permits the effective work of practical reason in order to accomplish its purpose in each place and situation.

Keywords

Socio-economic machines Entanglement of facts and values Shortcomings of the HDI 

References

  1. Alkire S (2002) Valuing freedoms. Sen’s capabilities approach and poverty reduction valuing freedoms. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkire S (2007) Choosing dimensions: The capability approach and multidimensional poverty. In: Kakwani N, Silber J (eds) The many dimensions of poverty. Palgrave-MacMillan, New York, pp 89–119Google Scholar
  3. Alkire S, Santos ME (2010) Acute multidimensional poverty: a new index for developing countries. Human development research paper 2010/11Google Scholar
  4. Allen RGD (1951) Statistics for economists. Hutchison, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Anand S, Amartya S (1994) Human development index: methodology and measurement. Occasional papers, 12, Human development report office, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Anand S, Sen A (2000) The income component of the human development index. J Hum Dev 1(1):83–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson E (1993) Value in ethics and economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass)Google Scholar
  8. Arabi SH (2010) Well-being: an Islamic approach. Paper presented at the 13th international congress of the association for social economics, Montréal, 28 June–1 July 2010Google Scholar
  9. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics (1954) Translated and introduced by Sir David Ross, Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Aristotle. Politics (1958) Edited and translated by Ernst Barker. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Bagolin I, Comim F (2008) Human development index (HDI) and its family of indexes: an evolving critical review. Revista de Economia 34(2):7–28Google Scholar
  12. Banzhaf HS (2001) Quantifying the qualitative: quality-adjusted price indexes in the United States, 1915–61. In: Klein JL, Morgan MS (eds) The age of economic measurement, HOPE annual supplement, pp. 345–370Google Scholar
  13. Boumans M, Davis J (2009) Economic methodology. Amsterdam School of Economics, History and Methodology Group, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. Boumans MJ (2001) Fisher’s instrumental approach to index numbers. In: Klein JL, Morgan MS (eds) The age of economic measurement, HOPE annual supplement, pp. 313–344Google Scholar
  15. Boumans MJ (2005) How economists model the world into numbers. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Cartwright N (2002) The limits of causal order, from economics to physics. In: Mäki U (ed) Fact and fiction in economics. Models, realism and social construction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 137–151Google Scholar
  17. Cartwright N (2007) Hunting causes and using them. Approaches in philosophy and economics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen MR, Nagle E (1934) An introduction to logic and scientific method. Harcourt Brace, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Comim F (2008) Measuring capabilities. In: Comim F, Qizilbash M, Alkire S (eds) The capability approach. Concepts, measures and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 157–200Google Scholar
  20. Crespo RF (2012) Practical reasoning in economic affairs: the HD index as a case study. In: Castro Caldas J, Neves V (eds) Facts, values and objectivity in economics. Routledge, Abington and New York, pp. 158–179Google Scholar
  21. Crespo RF forthcoming. The increasing role of practical reason in the human development reports. Review of social economyGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis JB, Marin SR (2007) Identity and democracy: linking individual and social reasoning. development (2009) 52(4):500–508Google Scholar
  23. Davis JB, Solange RM (2007) Identity and democracy: linking individual and social reasoning. MimeoGoogle Scholar
  24. De Langhe R (2009) Mainstream economics: searching where the light is. J Post-Keynesian Econ 32/1:137–150Google Scholar
  25. Desrosières A (2008) L’argument statistique, I. Pour une sociologie historique de la quantification. Presses de l’École des mines, ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. Esposito L, Chaippero-Martinetti E (2008) Multidimensional poverty measurement: restricted and unrestricted hierarchy among poverty dimensions. Oxford poverty and human development initiative (OPHI) working paper, 22. http://www.ophi.org.uk/pubs/OPHI_WP22.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2010
  27. Finkelstein L (1982) Theory and philosophy of measurement. In: Sydenham PH (ed) Handbook of measurement science, vol 1. Wiley, New York, pp 1–30Google Scholar
  28. Fukuda-Parr S (2003) The human development paradigm: Operationalizing Sen’s ideas on capabilities. Fem Econ 9(2–3):301–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harrison M (2002) From theory to measurement to policies: operationalising the capability approach to well-being. Measurement in physics and economics discussion paper series 18/02, LSEGoogle Scholar
  30. Jolly R (2005) Interview by Thomas Weiss, United Nations Intellectual History Project. http://www.unhistory.org/CD/PDFs/Jolly.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2010
  31. Keynes JM (1921) A treatise on probability. MacMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Keynes JM (1973) The general theory and after: part II. Defence and development, the collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. XIV. MacMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. MacIntyre A (1984) The character of generalizations in social science and their lack of predictive power. In: After Virtue, MacIntyre A, University of Notre Dame Press, Indiana, pp 84–102Google Scholar
  34. Mäki U (2011) Models and the locus of their truth. Synthese 180:47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morgan MS (2001) Making measuring instruments. In: Klein JL, Morgan Mary S (eds) The age of economic measurement, HOPE annual supplement, pp 235–251Google Scholar
  36. Morgenstern O (1963) On the accuracy of economic observations. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  37. Nussbaum MC (2001) The Protagoras: a science of practical reasoning. In: Millgram E (ed) Varieties of practical reasoning. The MIT Press, Cambridge and London, pp 153–201Google Scholar
  38. Nussbaum MC (2003) Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Fem Econ 9(2-3):33–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Plato. Complete Works (1997) Cooper JM, Hutchison DS (eds) Hacket, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  40. PNUD (Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo) (2009) Aportes para el desarrollo humano en Argentina, Buenos Aires. (http://www.undp.org.ar/docs/Libros_y_Publicaciones/Aportes_desarrollo_humano_2009.pdf). Accessed 2 Nov 2010
  41. Porter T (1995) Trust in numbers. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  42. Reiss J (2008) Error in economics. Towards a more evidence-base methodology. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Robeyns I (2005b) Selecting capabilities for quality of life measurement. Soc Indic Res 74/1:9–55Google Scholar
  44. Sen A (1992) Inequality reexamined. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass)Google Scholar
  45. Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Sen A (2002) Rationality and freedom. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass)Google Scholar
  47. Sen A (2009) The idea of justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass)Google Scholar
  48. Stanton E (2007) The human development index: a history. Working paper series 127, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  49. Streeten P (1994) Human development: means and ends. Am Econ Rev 84(2):232–237Google Scholar
  50. Suppes P (2000) Measurement, theory of. In: Concise Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  51. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (1990) Human development report 1990. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  52. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (1991) Human development report 1991. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (1993) Human development report 1993. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  54. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (1999) Human development report 1999. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  55. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2009) Human development report 2009. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2010. Human Development Report (2010) The real wealth of nations: pathways to human development. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Wieland W (1996) El individuo y su identificación en el mundo de la contingencia. In La razón y su praxis. Cuatro ensayos filosóficos, 117–46. Buenos Aires: Biblos (Das Individuum und Seine Identifizierung in der Welt der Kontingenz. In: Hoffmann TS, Majestachak S (eds) Denken der Individualität. Festschrift für Josef Simon zum 65 Geburstag, Translated by Alejandro GV, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York pp 3–25)Google Scholar
  58. Woodward J (1989) Data and phenomena. Synthese 79(3):393–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsIAE, Universidad AustralPilarArgentina

Personalised recommendations