Advertisement

Nancy Cartwright, Capacities and Nomological Machines. The Role of Theoretical Reason in Science

  • Ricardo F. CrespoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy book series (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)

Abstract

This chapter introduces Cartwright’s thinking. She holds that explanation is the aim of science and that science should explain real causes using theoretical reason. Stable causes repeatedly linked originate what she calls “nomological machines”. Cartwright also holds the singularity and indeterminism of causes. We find in Aristotle and in Anscombe’s interpretations of causality adequate ground for this. From this perspective causality is a process of actualization of the power of an entity that may or may not occur due to internal or external factors. Cartwright assumes a greater difficulty in achieving causal explanations in the social realm than in the natural one. The greater complexity, the reflexivity and the lack of control have to do with singular human situations and human freedom. However, she leaves the door open to hope: “social science is hard, but not impossible.” This hope stems from the stability or regularity produced by institutions, habits or routines. Finally, on the basis of Cartwright, this Chapter proposes to distinguish between different types of socio-economic machines and models: theoretical and practical machines and models. Practically-designed machines are governed by practical and technical reason and can be embodied in institutions. Models are the blueprints of those machines.

Keywords

Nancy Cartwright Explanation Capacities Nomological machines Explanation in social sciences Socio-economic machines Models 

References

  1. Ackrill JL (1981) Aristotle the philosopher. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Anscombe GEM (1971) Causality and determination. Reprinted in Sosa E, Tooley M (eds) Causation, 1993. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 88–104Google Scholar
  3. Anscombe GEM, Geach PT (1961) Three philosophers. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Aristotle (1954) Nicomachean ethics. Translated and introduced by Sir David Ross. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Aristotle (1941) The basic works of Aristotle. Edited and with an introduction by Richard McKeon. Random House, New York (reprint of the translations prepared under the editorship of W. D. Ross. Oxford University Press, Oxford)Google Scholar
  6. Bogen J (2009) ‘Saving the phenomena’ and saving the phenomena. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00004554/01/Sumitted_’Saving’-Saving.doc. Accessed 19 Jan 2010
  7. Bogen J, Woodward J (1988) Saving the phenomena. Philos Rev 97(3):303–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boland L (2010) Cartwright on ‘economics’. Philos Soc Sci 40(3):530–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boudon R (1998) Social mechanisms without black boxes. In: Hedström P, Swedberg R (eds) Social mechanisms. An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 172–203Google Scholar
  10. Boumans MJ (2005) How economists model the world into numbers. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Cartwright N (1989) Nature′s capacities and their measurement. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Cartwright N (1992) Aristotelian natures and the modern experimental method. In: Earman J (ed) Inference, explanation, and other frustrations. University of California Press, Berkeley-Los Angeles-Oxford, pp 44–71Google Scholar
  13. Cartwright N (1995) Reply to Eells, Humphreys and Morrison. Philos Phenomenol Res 55(1):177–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cartwright N (1998) Capacities. In: John Davis D, Hands W, Mäki U (eds) The handbook of economic methodology. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 45–47Google Scholar
  15. Cartwright N (1999) The dappled world. A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cartwright N (2001) Ceteris paribus laws and socio-economic machines. In: Mäki U (ed) The economic world view. Studies in the ontology of economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 275–292Google Scholar
  17. Cartwright N (2002) The limits of causal order, from economics to physics. In: Mäki U (ed) Fact and fiction in economics. Models, realism and social construction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 137–151Google Scholar
  18. Cartwright N (2007a) Causal powers: what are they? Why do we need them? What can and cannot be done with them? Contingency and dissent in science series. Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, LSE, London. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/CPNSS/projects/ContingencyDissentInScience/DP/CausalPowersMonographCartwrightPrint%20Numbers%20Corrected.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2008
  19. Cartwright N (2007b) Hunting causes and using them. Approaches in philosophy and economics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cartwright N (2007c) No God, No laws. More details TBA. http://personal.lse.ac.uk/cartwrig/Papers/NoGodNoLaws.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2008
  21. Cartwright N (2008) Reply to Christoph Schmidt-Petri. In: Hartmann S, Hoefer C, Bovens L (eds) Nancy Cartwright’s philosophy of science. Routledge, London, pp 303–304Google Scholar
  22. Cartwright N (2009) If no capacities then no credible worlds. But can models reveal capacities? Erkenntnis 70:45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dilworth C (2006) The metaphysics of science. An account of modern science in terms of prinicples, laws and theories. Springer Verlag, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  24. Geach PT (1961) Aquinas. In: Anscombe Elizabeth G, Geach PT (eds) Three philosophers. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 64–125Google Scholar
  25. Guthrie WKC (1967) The Greek philosophers. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Hands DW (2001) Reflection without rules. Economic methodology and contemporary science theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Hintikka J (1992) The concept of induction in the light of the interrogative approach to inquiry. In: Earman J (ed) Inference, explanation, and other frustrations. Essays in the philosophy of science. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 23–43Google Scholar
  28. Hodgson G (2001) How economics forgot history. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoover K (2002) Econometrics and reality. In: Mäki U (ed) Fact and fiction in economics. Models, realism and social construction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 152–177Google Scholar
  30. Israel G (2007) Y-a-t-il des lois en économie? In: Berthoud A et al. (eds) Y-a-t-il des lois en économie? Villeneuve d’Ascq. Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, France, pp 9–29Google Scholar
  31. Keynes JM (1973) The general theory and after: part II. Defence and development, the collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol XIV. MacMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Le Blond JM, Marie J (1939) Logique et méthode chez Aristote. Vrin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  33. Lloyd GER (1974) Early Greek science: Thales to Aristotle. W. W. Norton & Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Mansion A (1913) Introduction à la Physique Aristotélicienne. Félix Alcan, ParisGoogle Scholar
  35. Mill JS (1882) A system of logic. Ratiocinative and inductive: being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation, 8th edn. Harper & Brothers Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Minto WR (1997) Foundations for a realist theory of causality. Doctoral thesis presented at the University of Western Ontario, Canada. http://enlightenment.supersaturated.com/essays/text/rickminto/diss/index.html. Accessed 20 June 2008
  37. Newman A (1995) Review of nature′s capacities and their measurement. Nous 29(2):274–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reiss J (2008a) Error in economics. Towards a more evidence-base methodology. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Reiss J (2008b) Social capacities. In: Hartmann S, Hoefer C, Bovens L (eds) Nancy Cartwright’s philosophy of science. Routledge, London, pp 265–288Google Scholar
  40. Ross WD (1959) Aristotle. Meridian Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Scarre G (1998) Mill on induction and scientific method. In: Skorupski J (ed) The Cambridge companion to mill. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 112–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmidt-Petri C (2008) Cartwright and Mill on tendencies and capacities. In: Hartmann S, Hoefer C, Bovens L (eds) Nancy Cartwright’s philosophy of science. Routledge, London, pp 291–302Google Scholar
  43. Skorupski J (1989) John Stuart Mill. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Sorabji R (1980) Necessity, cause and blame. Perspectives on Aristotle′s theory. Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Veatch HB (1974) Aristotle. A contemporary appreciation. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  46. Wallace WA (1996) The modeling of nature. Philosophy of science and philosophy of nature in synthesis. CUA Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson F (2007) John Stuart Mill. In: Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mill/. Accessed 23 June 2010
  48. Woodward J (1989) Data and phenomena. Synthese 79(3):393–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsIAE, Universidad AustralPilarArgentina

Personalised recommendations