• Ricardo F. CrespoEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy book series (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)


In this first chapter the main hypothesis of the book are presented. It argues that economics today requires the theoretical and practical uses of reason. These uses are first defined and characterized. Then, the concepts of “capacity” of Nancy Cartwright and of “capability” of Amartya Sen are introduced as examples of theses uses respectively. The book will argue that Sen’s capabilities—opportunities which are the goals of human development—are like Cartwright’s capacities—stable real causes—of the process of human development.


Theoretical reason Practical reason Instrumental reason Ends in economics Nancy Cartwright Capacity Amartya Sen Capability 


  1. Anderson E (1997) Practical reason and incommensurable goods. In: Ruth C (ed.) Incommensurability, incomparability and practical reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.), pp 90–109Google Scholar
  2. Anderson E (2005) Dewey’s moral philosophy. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Accessed 20 Aug 2008
  3. Aristotle (1954) Nicomachean ethics, translated and introduced by Sir David Ross. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Aristotle (1941) The basic works of aristotle. Edited and with an introduction by Richard McKeon. Random House, New York (reprint of the translations prepared under the editorship of Ross WD, Oxford University Press, Oxford)Google Scholar
  5. Arthur B, Durlauf S, Lane D (1997) The economy as an evolving complex system II. Reading: Perseus Book, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Boudon R (2004) Théorie du choix rationnel, théorie de la rationalité limitée ou individualisme méthodologique: que choisir? Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines 14(1):45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boumans M (2008) Measurement theory. In: Blume LE, Durlauf SN (eds.) The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Palgrave, Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Broome J (1993) Can a human be moderate? In: Frey RG, Morris CW (eds.) Value, welfare, and morality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 51–73Google Scholar
  9. Buchanan JM (1987) Economics between predictive science and moral philosophy. Texas A&M University Press, TexasGoogle Scholar
  10. Cartwright N (2001) Ceteris paribus laws and socio-economic machines. In: Mäki U (ed.) The economic world view. Studies in the ontology of economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 275–292Google Scholar
  11. Cartwright N (2007) Causal powers: what are they? Why do we need them? What can and cannot be done with them? Contingency and dissent in science series. Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, LSE, London. Accessed 20 June 2008
  12. Crespo RF (2012) Practical reasoning in economic affairs: the HD Index as a case study. In: Castro Caldas J, Neves V (eds) Facts, values and objectivity in economics. Routledge, Abington and New York, pp 158–179Google Scholar
  13. Crespo RF (forthcoming) The increasing role of practical reason in the Human Development Reports. Review of Social EconomyGoogle Scholar
  14. Cullity G, Gaut B (eds) (1997) Ethics and practical reason. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis JB (2003) The theory of individual in economics. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis JB (2004) Collective intentionality, complex economic behavior, and valuation. In: Davis JB, Marciano A, Runde J (eds) The Elgar companion to economics and philosophy. Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton, pp 386–402Google Scholar
  17. Finnis J (1982) Natural law and natural rights. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Finnis J (1997) Commensuration and public reason. In: Ruth C (ed.) Incommensurability, incomparability and practical reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.), pp 215–33Google Scholar
  19. Finnis J (1998) Aquinas. Moral, political, and legal theory. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Foot P (2003) Natural goodness. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Gauthier, René A, Jean Yves J (1970) Aristote. L’Éthique a Nicomaque, Introduction, traduction et commentaire, Tome II. Publications Universitaires and Béatrice-Nauwelaerts, Commentaire. Louvain and ParisGoogle Scholar
  22. Hampton J (1994) The failure of expected-utility theory as a theory of reason. Econ Philos 10:195–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hargreaves Heap S (1989) Rationality in economics. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Hargreaves Heap S (2001) Expressive rationality: is self-worth just another kind of preference? In: Mäki U (eds.) The economic world view. Studies in the ontology of economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 98–113Google Scholar
  25. Hausman DM (1992) The inexact and separate science of economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, MelbourneCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirshman AO (1985) Against Parsimony. Three easy ways of complicating some categories of economic discourse. Econ Philos 1:7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Horkheimer Max. [1967] (2007) Crítica de la razón instrumental. Buenos Aires. In: Terramar (eds.) (Zur Kritik der instrumentellen Vernunft)Google Scholar
  28. Hume D [1739–1740] (1968) A treatise of human nature. Selby-Bigge LA (ed.) Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Kahneman D (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am Econ Rev 93(5):1449–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kant I [1787] (1952) The critique of pure reason. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Chicago, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Liddell HG, Scott R (1900) An Intermediate Greek- English Lexikon, founded upon the seventh edition of Liddell and Scott’s Greek-English Lexikon, Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Khalil EL (1997) Buridan’s ass, risk, uncertainty, and self-competition: a theory of entrepreneurship. Kyklos 50(2):147–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khalil E (1996) What is economic action? From Marshall and Robbins to Polanyi and Becker. J Hist Econ Thought 18:13–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knight FH (1956) On the history and method of economics. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  35. Kraut R (2006) How to justify ethical propositions: Aristotle’s Method. In: Kraut R (ed) The blackwell guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 76–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lawson T (1997) Situated rationality. J Econ Methodol 4(1):101–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mäki U (2002) The dismal queen of the social sciences. In: Mäki U (ed.) Fact and fiction in economics. Models, realism and social construction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–32Google Scholar
  38. Mill JS (1882) A system of logic. Ratiocinative and inductive: being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation, 8th edn. Harper & Brothers Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Millgram E (ed.) (2001) Varieties of practical reasoning. The MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.)Google Scholar
  40. Parsons T (1934) Some reflections on ‘the nature and significance of economics’. Q J Econ 48(3):511–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peacock M (2003) Two-tier rationality and reflexivity: an examination of the foundations of economic reason. Review of Social Economy, LXI/1, pp 73–89Google Scholar
  42. Plato (1997) Complete works. In: Cooper JM, Hutchison DS (eds.) Hacket, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  43. Riedel M (ed.) (1972–1974) Rehabilitierung der praktischen Philosophie. Rombach, FreiburgGoogle Scholar
  44. Robbins L (1984) [1935] Essay on the nature and significance of economic science. MacMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Russell B (1923) Vagueness. Australas J Psychol Philos 1:84–92. Accessed 8 Jan 2010
  46. Sen A (1987) On ethics and economics. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  47. Sen A (1993) Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum MC, Sen A (eds.) The quality of life. Oxford University Press and The United Nations University, Oxford, pp 30–53Google Scholar
  48. Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Sen A (2002) Rationality and freedom. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.)Google Scholar
  50. Sen A (2009) The idea of justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.)Google Scholar
  51. Simon HA (1976) From substantive to procedural rationality. In: SJ Latsis (eds.) Method and appraisal in economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–148Google Scholar
  52. Stewart H (1995) A critique of instrumental reason in economics. Econ Philos 11:57–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strauss L (1959) What is political philosophy? The Free Press of Glencoe, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  54. Sugden R (1991) Rational choice: a survey of contributions from economics and philosophy. Econ J 101:751–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vercelli A (1991) Methodological foundations of macroeconomics: Keynes and Lucas. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wallace R (2008) Practical reason, Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Accessed 10 Jan 2010

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsIAE, Universidad AustralPilarArgentina

Personalised recommendations