Skip to main content

The Gestalt Imperative: A Proposition for Understanding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing and Engineering in Complex Situations

Part of the book series: Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality ((TSRQ,volume 21))

  • 1150 Accesses

Abstract

With so many terms available to define the same thing, it would seem nearly irresponsible to introduce yet another term [complex situation] that appears to describe a phenomenological state such as a system. However, complex situation infers both a broader meaning and imposes a differing perspective. Complex in this context is dependent on understanding and reality rather than observer and knowledge, and Situation imposes a gestalt that cannot be characterized within a singular perspective that relegates paradox to a hierarchically imposed primacy where the “squeaky wheel” gets the attention. This also infers that complex situation has no monotonic definition or each attempt at a definition by a singular perspective is by default incomplete. Therefore the perennial derivations for system: complex systems, system of systems, federation of systems, stochastic, chaotic, dynamic etc.… are no longer a sufficient descriptor for complex situation. Ergo system and its genealogy lack the constitution to define complex situations. To wit, this paper provides the premise for a situation and describes the conditions that make it complex sufficiently for syncretic study by discipline(s) in the proposed field of complex situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bohrs N (1949) Discussions with Albert Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics. In Albert Einstein: philosopher-scientist (1949). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer V (2008) Anatomy of systems: a debate on complexity candidacy exam. Old Dominion University, Norfolk

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer V (2010) A decision making construct for complex situations. Dissertation, Old Dominion University

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacic S, Sousa-Poza A, Keating C (2006) Complex situations: an alternative approach for viewing a system of systems. In: Systems of systems engineering/2006 IEEE international conference, 26–28 April, Los Angeles Ca

    Google Scholar 

  • National Centers for System of Systems Engineering (NCSOSE) (2003) Mission statement. Old Dominion University, Norfolk. http://www.ncsose.org/

  • Padilla J, Sousa-Poza A, Tejada A, Kovacic S (2007) Towards a diagnostic framework for understanding complex situations. In: 7th international conference on complex systems, Quincy, MA, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla J, Sousa Poza A, Tejada A, Kovacic S (2007) Towards a diagnostic framework for understanding complex situations. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on complex systems, 7th international conference on complex situations, Quincy, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine I, Stengers I (1984) Order out of chaos, Man’s new dialogue with nature, Bantam new age books. Includes works from: Pascal B 1623–1662, Diderot (1713–1784), Kant I 1724–1804, Hegel G 1770–1831, Bergson H-L 1859–1941, WhiteHead A 1861–1947

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N (1996). Instructive journey: an autobiographical essay. University Press of America, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N (2000) Process philosophy, a survey of basics issues. University of Pittsburg Press, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld L (1961) Foundations of quantum theory and complementarity. Nature 190:384–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa-Poza A, Correa-Martinez (2005) Pragmatic idealism as the basis for understanding complex domains: the trinity and SOSE. In: 2005 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, vol 3, Anchorage, AK, 10–12 Oct 2005, pp 2744–2750

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb N (2007) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe F (1989) Taking the quantum leap: the new physics for the non-scientist. Harper & Row Publisher, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel F. Kovacic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kovacic, S.F. (2013). The Gestalt Imperative: A Proposition for Understanding. In: Kovacic, S., Sousa-Poza, A. (eds) Managing and Engineering in Complex Situations. Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5515-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5515-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5514-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5515-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics