Skip to main content

The Family and Gay Men and Lesbians

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover International Handbook on the Demography of Sexuality

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Population ((IHOP,volume 5))

Abstract

In the last 10 years, there has been increased attention given to the demographic analysis of same-sex couples and their families. This attention may be attributed to multiple factors, including current debates and social movements regarding issues of sexual orientation and legislative rights. Additionally, one paramount factor contributing to the increased attention is the availability of better data on same-sex households. While these data are limited, the inclusion of various measures and indicators of sexual orientation and access to large-scale nationally representative data gives demographers a starting point to examine issues of sexual orientation. Currently, there is growing support for the argument that sexual orientation does have an effect on demographic processes and life outcomes. This chapter presents an overview of the current demographic research on same-sex families. It describes how same-sex families are understood by demographers, limitations to this demographic research, and demonstrates how demography can illuminate issues of same-sex families. This chapter also draws on research outside of demography, primarily from family studies, to further highlight substantive concerns and future directions for demographic research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The National Health and Social Life Survey (NHSLS) was conducted in 1992 by Edward O. Laumann and his associates (see The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States [1994]).

  2. 2.

    The Cycle 6 and, the newly released, Cycle 7 of the National Survey of Family Growth were conducted in 2002 and 2006–2008 respectively, by the National Center for Health Statistics (National Center for Health Statistics 2004, 2010).

  3. 3.

    The other 243 individuals under 18 were identified as: head/householder (33), unmarried partners (111), boarders (72), and housemates (27).

  4. 4.

    The same states had positive laws for both types of adoption, thus we were unable to distinguish whether the adoption or the second parent adoption laws might be playing a greater role in producing this positive effect.

  5. 5.

    For more discussion on issues related to income and same-sex families and households see Chap. 13.

  6. 6.

    This list does not speak to civil unions or domestic partnerships, rather it solely refers to same-sex marriage recognition.

  7. 7.

    Only summary file counts and preferred estimates have been released at time of publishing.

References

  • Allen, K. R., & Demo, D. H. (1995). The families of lesbians and gay men: A new frontier in family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baca Zinn, M., & Eitzen, D. S. (1999). Diversity in families (5th ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baca Zinn, M., & Eitzen, S. D. (2008). Diversity in families (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badgett, M. V. L. (2001). Money, myths, and change: The economic lives of lesbian and gay men. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumle, A. K., & Compton, D. R. (2011). Legislating the Family: The effect of state family laws on the presence of children in same-sex households. Law and Policy, 33(1), 82–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumle, A. K., Compton, D. R., & Poston, D. L., Jr. (2009). Same-sex partners: The demography of sexual orientation. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benokraitis, N. V. (2011). Marriages and families: Changes, choices, and constraints (7th ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biblarz, T. J., & Savci, E. (2010). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 480–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. A., Gates, G. J., Sanders, S. G., & Taylor, L. J. (2000). Demographics of the gay and lesbian ­population in the United States: Evidence from ­available systematic data sources. Demography, 37, 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. A., Makar, H. R., Sanders, S. G., & Taylor, L. J. (2003). The earnings effects of sexual orientation. Industrial and Labor Relation Review, 56, 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, J., Barrett, K., & Honnald, J. A. (2002). The census and same-sex households: A user’s guide. New York: The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute/The Survey and Evaluation Research Laboratory/The Fenway Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The tie that binds: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, S., Ellen, M., & Tobias, S. (2002). Family policy: Issues affecting gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered families. New York: The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, C. (1999). No place like home. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cianciotto, J., & Cahill, S. (2003). Education policy: Issues affecting lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered youth. New York: The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, E. (2009). Strength in numbers: Advocates and opponents of gay rights both eagerly await new census data on same-sex couples. Newsweek, October 27, 2009. Retrieved June 1, 2010, from http://www.newsweek.com/2009/10/26/strength-in-numbers

  • Demo, D. H., & Allen, K. R. (1996, August). Diversity within lesbian and gay families: Challenges and implications for family theory and research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 415–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demo, D. H., Allen, K. R., & Fine, M. A. (2000). An overview of family diversity: Controversies, questions, and values. In Handbook of family diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, G. J. (2009). Same-sex spouses and unmarried partners in the American community survey, 2008 (Williams Institute Report). Los Angeles. Retrieved March 1, 2009, from www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/pdf/ACS2008_Final.pdf

  • Gates, G. J., & Ost, J. (2004). The gay and lesbian atlas. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, G. J., Badgett, M. V. L., Macomber, J. E., & Chambers, K. (2007). Adoption and foster care by gay and lesbian parents in the United States (Williams Institute and The Urban Institute Report). Los Angeles. Retrieved July 27, 2010, from http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/publications/FinalAdoptionReport.pdf

  • Gottman, J. M., Murray, J., Swanson, C. C., Tyson, R., & Swanson, K. R. (2002). The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. (1987, Winter). Perceived emotional support from family and friends in members of homosexual, married, and heterosexual cohabiting couples. Journal of Homosexuality, 14, 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdek, L. (1992). Relationship stability and relationship satisfaction in cohabitating gay and lesbian couples: A prospective longitudinal test of the contextual and interdependence models. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leff, L. (2009). 2010 census will count same-sex couples in Reversal of Bush Policy. New York: Huffington Post. Retrieved June 1, 2010, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/20/210-census-will-count-sam_n_218489.html

  • National Center for Health Statistics. (2004). National survey of family growth, cycle 6, 2002 (CD-ROM series 23, Number 4A). Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Health Statistics. (2010). National survey of family growth, cycle 6, 2002. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved May 28, 2010, from http://www.cdc.gov/NCHS/nsfg/nsfg_2006_2008_puf.htm

  • O’Connell, M., & Lofquist, D. (2009, April 30–May 2). Counting same-sex couples: Official estimates and unofficial guesses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Detroit, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, M., & Feliz, S. (2011). Same-sex couple household statistics from the 2010 census. Washington, D.C.: United States Census Bureau. Retrieved October 12, 2011, from http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/2010_census/cb11-cn181.html

  • Sarantakos, S. (1996, October). Same-sex couples: Problems and prospects. Journal of Family Studies, 2, 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. (1993). A review of “families we choose: Lesbians, gays, Kinship”. Contemporary Sociology, 22, 230–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, T., & O’Connell, M. (2003). Married-couple and unmarried-partner households: 2000. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau. Retrieved May 25, 2006, from www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/censr-5.pdf

  • Smith, D. M., & Gates G. J. (2001, August 22). Gay and lesbian families in the United States: Same-sex unmarried partner households (A Human Rights Campaign Report). Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J., & Biblarz, T. J. (2001). (How) does the sexual orientation of parents matter? American Sociological Review, 66, 159–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, G. H. (2002). Families in context. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L. J. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32, 483–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L. J. (2005). Marriage and family. In D. L. Poston Jr. & M. Micklin (Eds.), Handbook of population (pp. 87–108). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (1999). The case for marriage. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, C. S., & Poston, D. L., Jr. (2004). Patterns of gay and lesbian partnering in the larger metropolitan areas of the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, K. (1991). Families we choose: Lesbians, gays, kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D’Lane R. Compton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Compton, D.R. (2013). The Family and Gay Men and Lesbians. In: Baumle, A. (eds) International Handbook on the Demography of Sexuality. International Handbooks of Population, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5512-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics