Abstract
This paper, based on ongoing research in the Poznan metropolitan region, contrasts theoretical approaches to the issue of metropolitan governance in America and Western Europe with the practical experience of a post-socialist country – Poland – using examples from the Poznań Metropolitan Area. International comparative studies (e.g. Jouve and Lefèvre, Local power, territory and institutions in European metropolitan regions. Frank Cass, London, 2002, Herrschel and Newman, Governance of Europe’s city regions: planning, policy and politics. Routledge, London, 2002, Salet et al., Metropolitan governance and spatial planning. Comparative case studies of European city-regions. Spon Press, London, 2003, Heinelt and Kübler, Metropolitan governance. Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place. Routledge, London, 2005) have shown that “place matters”. It is emphasised that the nation-specific “tradition” and character of administration are of importance to the metropolitan government model. The evolution of the territorial and administrative structures of the big cities and suburban areas in Poland is different from Western Europe and North America. Between 1950 and 1990, Poland has a monolithic state government system, in which the decentralisation principle did not apply. Reforms of 1990 and 1998 brought the model of territorial administration in Poland closer to European standards on the local and regional levels. However, these reforms took little consideration of issues related to the metropolitan, as opposed to the local or regional, scale in the country’s territorial and administrative structure. As a consequence, few formal institutions for metropolitan governance have been created, and metropolitan governance has been neglected. This has resulted in local inequalities in the quality and provision of services, and competition among local governments for inward investment and development, often causing adverse impacts at the metropolitan scale. In Poland, in 1990, an almost instant democratic breakthrough in the political system resulted in embracing the ideals of local government and the autonomy of communes. In Poland, the model of governance in metropolitan areas has been moving towards one of public choice, despite being limited by central government control which continues to be strong. The country’s socioeconomic development and advancing suburbanisation have created problems which can only be resolved on a metropolitan scale. The position of local governments in Poland is strong enough to make radical metropolitan reform socially and politically unlikely. At present, the only feasible solution appears to be the intensification of voluntary collaboration stimulated, perhaps, by small legislative changes at the national level. Nevertheless, as compared to the situation 20 years ago, the trend towards fragmentation has reversed. After a period in which local governments gained and secured their independence, now we are facing a stage of integration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bailey S (1993) Public choice theory and the reform of local government in Britain: from government to governance. Public Policy Adm 8(2):7–24
Barlow M (1997) Administrative systems and metropolitan regions. Environ Plan C Gov Policy 15(4):399–412
Bish RL (1971) The public economy of metropolitan areas. Markham, Chicago
Bish RL, Ostrom V (1974) Understanding urban government: metropolitan reform reconsidered. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington
Brenner N (2003) Metropolitan institutional reform and the rescaling of state space in contemporary Western Europe. Eur Urban Reg Stud 10(4):297–324
Green H (1974) Fiscal interactions in a metropolitan area. D.C. Heath, Lexington
Hawley A (1951) Metropolitan population and municipal government expenditures in central cities. J Soc Issues 7(1):100–108
Heinelt H, Kübler D (eds) (2005) Metropolitan governance. Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place. Routledge, London
Herrschel T, Newman P (2002) Governance of Europe’s city regions: planning, policy and politics. Routledge, London
Hooghe L, Marks G (2001) Multilevel governance and European integration. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham
Jouve B, Lefèvre C (eds) (2002) Local power, territory and institutions in European metropolitan regions. Frank Cass, London
Kaczmarek T (2005) Struktury terytorialno-administracyjne i ich reformy w krajach europejskich (The territorial-administrative structures and their reforms in European states). Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznan
Kaczmarek T, Mikuła Ł (2007a) Metropolitan areas in Poland – towards a new scale of urban governance? Quaestiones Geographicae 26B:97–105
Kaczmarek T, Mikuła Ł (2007b) Ustroje terytorialno-administracyjne obszarów metropolitalnych w Europie (The territorial-administrative systems of metropolitan areas in Europe). Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznan
Kulesza M (2006) Konsolidacja zarządzania w samorządzie – wybrane zagadnienia. Uwagi do dyskusji (The consolidation of management in local government – chosen aspects. Points to discussion). Samorząd Terytorialny 7–8:5–17
Lefèvre C (1998) Metropolitan government and governance in western countries: a critical review. Int J Urban Reg Res 22(1):9–25
Lyons WE, Lowery D (1989) Governmental fragmentation versus consolidation: five public choice myths about how to create informed, involved and happy citizens. Public Adm Rev 49(10):533–543
Marks G (1993) Structural policy and multilevel governance in the EC. In: Cafruny A, Rosenthal G (eds) The state of the European community, vol 2. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, pp 391–410
Mikuła Ł (2008) Promocja i rozwój turystyki jako element współpracy metropolitalnej (The development and promotion of tourism as an element of metropolitan cooperation). In: Jażdżewska I (ed) Funkcja turystyczna miast. Wydawnictwo UŁ, Łódź, pp 25–36
Mikuła Ł (2010) Funkcjonowanie aglomeracji poznańskiej w opinii mieszkańców i polityków lokalnych (The Poznań Agglomeration in opinion of its residents and local politicians). Biblioteka Aglomeracji Poznańskiej, Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań
Mitchell-Weaver C, Miller D, Deal R Jr (2000) Multilevel governance and metropolitan regionalism in the USA. Urban Stud 37(5–6):851–876
Neenan W (1972) Political economy of urban areas. Markham, Chicago
Ostrom E (1972) Metropolitan reform: propositions derived from two traditions. Soc Sci Q 53:474–493
Ostrom V, Tiebout CM, Warren R (1961) The organisation of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry. Am Polit Sci Rev 55:831–842
Pacione M (2001) Urban geography. Routledge, London
Parks RB, Oakerson RJ (2000) Regionalism, localism and metropolitan governance: suggestions from the research program on local public economies. State Local Gov Rev 32:169–179
Salet W, Thornley A, Kreukels A (eds) (2003) Metropolitan governance and spatial planning. Comparative case studies of European city-regions. Spon Press, London
Silva CN (2007) Reinventing local and metropolitan government. Public Adm Rev 67(5):954–957
Swanstrom T (2001) What we argue about when we argue about regionalism. J Urban Aff 23(5):479–496
Tiebout C (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ 64:416–424
Warren R (1966) Government in metropolitan regions: a reappraisal of fractionated political organization. University of California, Institute of Governmental Affairs, Davis
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mikuła, Ł. (2015). Theories of Metropolitan Government and the Post-socialist Experience: The Case of Poznań Metropolitan Area. In: Buček, J., Ryder, A. (eds) Governance in Transition. Springer Geography. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5503-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5503-1_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5502-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5503-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)