Advertisement

Ernst Cassirer, Kurt Lewin, and Hans Reichenbach

  • Jeremy HeisEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science book series (BSPS, volume 273)

Abstract

This chapter concerns the philosophical and personal interactions between the Neo-Kantian philosopher Ernst Cassirer and two members of the Berlin Group, Kurt Lewin and Hans Reichenbach. Both Lewin and Reichenbach were students of Cassirer’s in Berlin, and both explicitly discuss Cassirer’s work in their writings. After some biographical material drawn from their published and unpublished works and correspondence (Sect. 4.1), Sect. 4.2 of the paper argues that each of the three shared a broad conception of philosophy as the “logical analysis of science,” though each carried out this project in different ways. Lewin used philosophical ideas from Cassirer to motivate his original and consequential research program in experimental psychology (Sect. 4.3). Reichenbach, on the other hand, initially drew on Cassirer’s theory of the a priori in isolating a priori “coordinating principles” in general relativity, and then later rejected Cassirer’s theory by relabeling these principles as conventions (Sect. 4.4). That Cassirer did not follow Reichenbach into conventionalism springs, I argue, from Cassirer’s rejection of Reichenbach’s view that theory-neutral experimental measurements could ground physical theories in an objective way.

Keywords

Logical Analysis Vienna Circle Objective Coincidence Aristotelian Physic General Logical Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ash, Mitchell G. 1994. Gestalttheorie und Logischer Empirismus. In Hans Reichenbach und die Berliner Gruppe, ed. Lutz Danneberg, Andreas Kamlah, and Lothar Schäfer, 87–100. Braunschweig: Vieweg.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, J.F. 1929. The methods of Kurt Lewin in the psychology of action and affection. Psychological Review 36: 200–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carnap, Rudolf. 1932/1934. Die physikalische Sprache als Universalsprache der Wissenschaft. Erkenntnis 2:432–465. Trans. M. Black with author’s introduction as The Unity of Science. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench Teubner & Co.Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, Rudolf. 1932/1959. Psychologie in physikalischer Sprache. Erkenntnis 3:107–142. Trans. G. Schick as psychology in physicalist language in Logical positivism, ed. Ayer, 165–198. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carnap, Rudolf, Hans Hahn and Otto Neurath. 1929/1973. Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung - Der Wiener Kreis. Vienna. Trans. Artur Wolf as The scientific conception of the world: The Vienna Circle, in Otto Neurath, Empiricism and Sociology, ed. M. Neurath and R.S. Cohen, 299–318. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  6. Carus, A.W. 2008. Carnap and twentieth century thought: Explication as enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cassirer, Ernst. 1906/1922. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neuren Zeit. Erster Band, 3rd ed. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
  8. Cassirer, Ernst. 1907. Kant und die moderne Mathematik. Kant-Studien 12: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassirer, Ernst. 1910/1923. Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen der Erkenntniskritik. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer. Trans. William Curtis Swabey, and Marie Collins Swabey in Substance and function & Einstein’s theory of relativity. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  10. Cassirer, Ernst. 1912. Hermann Cohen und die Erneuerung der Kantischen Philosophie. Kant-Studien 17: 252–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassirer, Ernst. 1918/1981. Kants Leben und Lehre. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer. Trans. James Haden as Kant’s life and thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cassirer, Ernst. 1921/1923. Zur Einstein’schen Relativitätstheorie. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer Verlag. Trans. William Curtis Swabey, and Marie Collins Swabey in Substance and function & Einstein’s theory of relativity. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  13. Cassirer, Ernst. 1923/1955. Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen. Erster Teil: Die Sprache. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer. Trans. Charles W. Hendel, and Ralph Manheim as Philosophy of symbolic Forms. Volume One: Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cassirer, Ernst. 1927. Erkenntnistheorie nebst den Grenzfragen der Logik und Denkpsychologie. Reprinted in Erkenntnis, Begriff, Kultur, ed. R. Bast. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
  15. Cassirer, Ernst. 1942/2000. Zur Logik der Kulturwissenschaften: Fünf Studien. Göteborg: Wettergren & Kerbers Forlag. Trans Lofts, S.G. as The logic of the cultural sciences. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cassirer, Ernst. 1999. Ziele und Wege der Wirklichkeitserkenntnis, ed. Klaus Christian Köhnke and John Michael Krois. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Cassirer, Ernst. 2009. Ausgewählter wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel. In Nachgelassene Manuskripte und Texte, vol. 18, ed. John Michael Krois et al. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  18. Coffa, J.Alberto. 1991. The semantic tradition from Kant to Carnap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, Hermann. 1902. Logik der reinen Erkenntnis. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
  20. Duncker, Karl. 1932/1933. Behaviorismus und Gestaltspsychologie. Kritische Bemerkungen zu Carnaps ‘Psychologie in physikalischer Sprache. Erkenntnis 3: 162–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Einstein, Alfred. 1916. Die Grundlage der allgemeine Relativitätstheorie. Annalen der Physik 49:769–822. Trans. W. Perret, and G. B. Jeffery in The principle of relativity, 109–164. New York: Dover Publications, n.d.Google Scholar
  22. Ferrari, Massimo. 1997. Über die Ursprünge des logischen Empirismus, den Neukantianismus und Ernst Cassirer aus der Sicht der neueren Forschung. In Von der Philosophie zur Wissenschaft. Cassirers Dialog mit der Naturwissenschaft, ed. Enno Rudolph and Ion O. Stamatescu. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  23. Ferrari, Massimo. 2003. Ernst Cassirer: Stationen einer philosophischen Biographie. Trans. Marion Lauschke. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. Friedman, Michael. 1999. Reconsidering logical positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Friedman, Michael. 2000. A parting of the ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger. Chicago: Open Court Press.Google Scholar
  26. Friedman, Michael. 2001. Dynamics of reason. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Heis, Jeremy. 201?. Ernst Cassirer’s Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
  28. Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of pure reason. Trans. Paul Guyer, and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kinkel, Walter. 1904/1920. Immanuel Kants Logik: Ein Handbuch zu Vorlesungen, dritte Auflage, neu herausgegeben, mit einer Einleitung sowie einem Personen- und Sachregister versehen, 3rd ed. Leipzig: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
  30. Krois, John Michael. 2000. Ernst Cassirer und der Wiener Kreis. In Elemente moderner Wissenschaftstheorie, ed. Friedrich Stadler, 105–121. Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Lewin, Kurt. 1922. Der Begriff der Genese in Physik, Biologie und Entwicklungsgeschichte. Berlin: Bonträger.Google Scholar
  32. Lewin, Kurt. 1925. Über Idee und Aufgabe der vergleichenden Wissenschaftslehre. Symposion 1:61–93. Reprinted in Wissenschaftstheorie I, ed. Alexandre Métraux as vol.1 of Werkausgabe, ed. Carl-Friedrich Graumann. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  33. Lewin, Kurt. 1926. Intention, Will, and Need. In A Kurt Lewin Reader, ed. Martin Gold. New York: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  34. Lewin, Kurt. 1927. Gesetz und experiment in der psychologie. Reprinted in Wissenschaftstheorie I, ed. Alexandre Métraux as vol.1 of Werkausgabe, ed. Carl-Friedrich Graumann. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  35. Lewin, Kurt. 1931a. Der Übergang von aristotelischen zum galileischen Denken in Biologie und Psychologie. Erkenntnis 1: 429–466.Google Scholar
  36. Lewin, Kurt. 1931b. The conflict between Aristotelian and Galilean modes of thought in contemporary psychology. Journal of General Psychology 5:141–177. Trans. D. K. Adams. Reprinted in A Kurt Lewin Reader, ed. Martin Gold. New York: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  37. Lewin, Kurt. 1936. Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewin, Kurt. 1937. Psychoanalysis and Topological Psychology. In A Kurt Lewin Reader, ed. Martin Gold. New York: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  39. Lewin, Kurt. 1949. Cassirer’s philosophy of science and the social sciences. In The philosophy of Ernst Cassirer, ed. A. Schilpp, 269–288. Evanston, Ill.: Open Court. Reprinted in A Kurt Lewin Reader, ed. Martin Gold. New York: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  40. Lewin, Kurt. 1981. Wissenschaftstheorie I, ed. Alexandre Métraux as vol. 1 of Werkausgabe, ed. Carl-Friedrich Graumann. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  41. Lewin, Kurt. 1992. Law and experiment in psychology. Science in Context 5: 385–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lewin, Kurt. 1999. The complete social scientist: A Kurt Lewin Reader, ed. Martin Gold. New York: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  43. Marrow, Alfred. 1969. The practical theorist: The life and work of Kurt Lewin. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  44. Natorp, Paul. 1912. Kant und die Marburger Schule. Kant-Studien 17: 193–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neurath, Otto. 1930. Historische Anmerkungen. Erkenntnis 1: 311–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Neurath, Otto, et al. 1930. Chronik. Erkenntnis 1: 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Neurath, Otto, et al. 1931. Chronik. Erkenntnis 2: 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Padovani, Flavia. 2011. Relativizing the relativized a priori: Reichenbach’s axioms of coordination divided. Synthese 181: 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Petzold, Joseph. 1921. Die Stellung der Relativitätstheorie. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
  50. Reichenbach, Hans. 1920/1965. Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis apriori. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Trans. and ed. Maria Reichenbach as The theory of relativity and a priori knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  51. Reichenbach, Hans. 1922/1981. The present state of the discussion of relativity. In Modern philosophy of science: Selected essays. ed. Hans Reichenbach. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  52. Reichenbach, Hans. 1924/1969. Axiomatik der relativistischen Raum-Zeit-Lehre. Braunschweig: Fried. Vieweg & Sohn. Trans. M. Reichenbach as Axiomatization of the theory of relativity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. Reichenbach, Hans. 1928/1957. Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Trans. Maria Reichenbach and John Freund as The philosophy of space and time. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  54. Reichenbach, Hans. 1936. Logical empiricism in Germany and the present state of its problems. The Journal of Philosophy 33: 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reichenbach, Hans. 2008. The concept of probability in the mathematical representation of reality. Trans. and ed. Frederick Eberhardt and Clark Glymour. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  56. Richardson, Alan. 1998. Carnap’s construction of the world: The Aufbau and the emergence of logical empiricism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Richardson, Alan. 2006. ‘The fact of science’ and critique of knowledge: Exact science as problem and resource in Marburg Neo-Kantianism. In The Kantian legacy in nineteenth-century science, ed. Michael Friedman and Alfred Nordmann, 211–226. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. Ryckman, Thomas. 1992. P(oint)-C(oincident) thinking: The ironical attachment of logical empiricism to general relativity (and some lingering consequences). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23: 471–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ryckman, Thomas. 1994. Weyl, Reichenbach and the epistemology of geometry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25: 831–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ryckman, Thomas. 2005. The reign of relativity: Philosophy in physics, 1915–1925. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schlick, Moritz. 1921/1979. Kritizistische oder empiristische Deutung der neuen Physik? Kant-Studien 26: 96–111. Translated as Critical or Empiricist Interpretation of Modern Physics? In Moritz Schlick: Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2, eds. H. Mulder and B. van de Velde-Schlick. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Logic and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations