Advertisement

Embedded Moral Agency: A MacIntyrean Perspective on the HR Professional’s Dilemma

  • Tracy WilcoxEmail author
Chapter
  • 877 Downloads
Part of the Issues in Business Ethics book series (IBET, volume 38)

Abstract

In this chapter I cast a spotlight on the presupposed sociology implicit in any moral philosophy. Specifically, I examine how social actors in a business organisation – where contextual factors may constrain particular practices – come to exercise moral agency in their organisational roles. I consider MacIntyre’s argument that in contemporary social life ‘structures of compartmentalization’ tend to prevent the exercise of moral agency, and examine whether this was the case for a group of human resource managers in a global corporation in the midst of a downsizing exercise. I develop a more nuanced conceptualisation of moral agency and I apply this to the specifics of the modern business organisation, and consider how moral agency is seen to be constrained by what MacIntyre has termed ‘structures of compartmentalization’.

Keywords

Arena 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barsky, Noah P., Mohamed E. Hussein, and Stephen F. Jablonsky. 1999. Shareholder and stakeholder value in corporate downsizing: The case of United Technologies Corporation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 12(5): 583–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhaskar, Roy. 1989. Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Butterfield, Kenneth D., Linda Klebe Trevino, and Gary R. Weaver. 2000. Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations 53(7): 981–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron, Kim S., Sarah J. Freeman, and Aneil K. Mishra. 1993. Downsizing and redesigning organizations. In Organizational change and redesign, ed. George Huber and William Glick, 19–65. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. DiMaggio, Paul J. 1997. Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology 23: 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1991. Introduction to the new institutionalism. In Organizational analysis, ed. Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio, 1–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Ann Mische. 1998. What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology 103(4): 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedland, R., and R. Alford. 1991. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, ed. Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio, 232–266. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gioia, Dennis A. 1992. Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics 11(5–6): 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jackall, Robert. 1988. Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jessop, Bob. 1990. State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Khurana, Rakesh, Nitin Nohria, and Daniel Penrice. 2005. Management as a profession. In Restoring trust American business, ed. Jay Lorsch, Leslie Berlowitz, and Andy Zelleke, 43–60. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lawrence, Thomas B., and Roy Suddaby. 2006. Institutions and institutional work. In The Sage handbook of organization studies, ed. Stewart R. Clegg, Cynthia Hardy, Thomas B. Lawrence, and Walter R. Nord, 215–254. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1999. Social structures and their threats to moral agency. Philosophy 74(289): 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2000. After virtue: A study in moral theory, 2nd ed. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  16. Mangham, Iain L. 1986. Power and performance in organizations: An exploration of executive process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. McKenna, Richard, and Eva Tsahuridu. 2001. Must managers leave ethics at home? Economics and moral anomie in business organisations. Reason in Practice 1(3): 67–75.Google Scholar
  18. Rao, Hayagreeva. 1994. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management Journal 15(S1): 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Scott, W.Richard. 2001. Institutions and organizations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Stones, Rob. 2005. Structuration theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Whittington, Richard. 1992. Putting Giddens into action: Social systems and managerial agency. Journal of Management Studies 29(6): 693–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilcox, Tracy. 2009. Repositioning human resource management in a global airline: The struggle for legitimacy. Ph.D. thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney.Google Scholar
  23. Wilcox, Tracy, and Diannah Lowry. 2000. Beyond resourcefulness: Casual workers and the human-centered organisation. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 19(3 & 4): 29–53.Google Scholar
  24. Wiley, Carolyn. 1998. Reexamining perceived ethics issues and ethics roles among employment managers. Journal of Business Ethics 17: 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Willis, Paul. 1980. Learning to labour: How working-class kids get working-class jobs. Hampshire: Gower.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management, Australia School of BusinessUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations