Transforming Agriculture for Sustainability: The Art and Science

  • Harold SchroederEmail author
Part of the Sustainable Agriculture Reviews book series (SARV, volume 11)


There is an urgent need for organizations in the agricultural sector and the food industry to adopt sustainable working practices to reduce the environmental impacts of their activities while meeting the challenge of an expected 50% increase in global demand for food. As in other sectors, however, organizations in agriculture and the food industry face economic pressures and must balance sustainability considerations with the need to operate a viable and competitive business. The adoption of sustainable working practices can make sound business sense, resulting in increased profits and other benefits; however, sustainability is still not a management priority in many organizations and relatively few have achieved the kind of holistic sustainability initiatives associated with business benefits.

Building on the findings from recent research on sustainability, this article argues that sustainability must be viewed in organizational transformation terms and that, like other forms of large-scale business change, it can only succeed if addressed using an “art and science” approach. Like other organizational transformations, sustainability initiatives are subject to a high rate of failure, often due to a lack of attention to the “art” or the people-related aspects of change. However, there is also a need to apply “science” to organizational change, in the form of project management and other specialist tools and techniques.

Drawing on recent sustainability literature, the article highlights aspects of art and science that are crucial for maximizing the business benefits of sustainability. It highlights the importance of achieving the right balance of art and science and of adopting a holistic approach when implementing sustainability initiatives. This is important if business benefits are to be achieved as well as positive environmental and social impacts. Since the agricultural sector and related food industries have such a big environmental footprint, it will be particularly important to adopt an art and science approach to transforming working practices in these sectors if real progress in sustainable agriculture is to be made.


Sustainable working Sustainable business practices Sustainability Organizational transformation Art and science Business benefits Organizational culture Strategic Sustainability Soft skills 


  1. Aberdeen Group (2010) The sustainable supply chain. Downloaded from Accessed 15 Sep 2012
  2. Brennan L, Binney W, McCrohan J, Lancaster N (2011) Implementation of environmental sustainability in business: suggestions for improvement. Australas Mark J 19:52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler JB, Henderson SC, Raiborn C (2011) Sustainability and the balanced scorecard: integrating green measures into business reporting. Manag Account Q 12(2):1–10Google Scholar
  4. Chartered Accountants of Canada, American Institute of CPAs, Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (2010) Evolution of corporate sustainability practices: perspectives from the UK, US and Canada. Downloaded from Accessed 15 Sep 2012
  5. Dao V, Langella I, Carbo J (2011) From green to sustainability: information technology and an integrated sustainability framework. J Strateg Inf Syst 20:63–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2011.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Economist Intelligence Unit (2009) The burning platform: how companies are managing change in a recession. Downloaded from Accessed 15 Sep 2012
  7. Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC; Stony Creek, CTGoogle Scholar
  8. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Agriculture and Consumer Protection Department (2001) Agriculture’s role in climate change. Accessed 15 Sep 2012
  9. GreenBiz Staff (2010) P&G launches the latest supplier sustainability scorecard. Accessed 15 Sep 2012
  10. IBM Corporation (2008) The enterprise of the future: IBM Global CEO Study 2008. Downloaded from Accessed 15 Sep 2012
  11. Haanaes K, Balagopal B, Arthur D et al (2011) First look: the second annual sustainability & innovation survey. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 52(2):77–83Google Scholar
  12. Hubbard G (2011) The quality of the sustainability reports of large international companies: an analysis. Int J Manag 28(3, Part 2):824–848Google Scholar
  13. Johnson D (2011) Sustainability: spin or substance? 45(5):28–30Google Scholar
  14. Kruschwitz N, Haanaes K (2011) First look: highlights from the Third Annual Sustainability Global Executive Survey. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 53(1):87–89Google Scholar
  15. McKinsey & Company (2010) Global forces: how strategic trends affect your business. Downloaded from Accessed 15 Sep 2012
  16. MIT Sloan Management Review and the Boston Consulting Group (2011) Sustainability: the “embracers” seize advantage. MIT Sloan Management Review Research Report, Winter 2011Google Scholar
  17. National Geographic (n.d.) Sustainable agriculture. Accessed 15 Sep 2012
  18. Piasecki B (2009) The surprising solution: creating possibility in a swift and severe world. Sourcebooks, Naperville, IllGoogle Scholar
  19. Starbucks Corporation website. Accessed 15 Sep 2012
  20. Svensson G, Wagner B (2011) Transformative business sustainability. Eur Bus Rev 23(4):334–352. doi: 10.1108/09555341111145735 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677. doi: 10.1038/nature01014 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Walmart (2011) Global responsibility report. Downloaded from Accessed 15 Sep 2012
  23. Yarett I (2011) The world’s green giants, Newsweek 2011 green rankings. Newsweek 158(17):50Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Schroeder & Schroeder Inc.TorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations