Advertisement

Experiential Learning Assessment and Competence Development for a Second Career: The Case of Alternating Training Programmes for Professional Promotion

  • Philippe Astier
  • Lucie PetitEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (TVET, volume 18)

Abstract

In France, apprenticeship as a system of training has become widespread at every level of qualification over the last 30 years. Usually called alternation, it becomes the fast track for a professionally oriented education and for a successful integration in the labour market. The efficiency of this system, particularly in initial training, is considered as a way of gaining professional competence and integrating a community of work and practice. But what about an alternating programme carried out during an occupational conversion or promotion? This chapter aims at describing the development of a tool designed for competence diagnosis. The latter was built up for a civil service school (National College for Education Management) which trains executives-to-be who contemplate starting a second career. At the beginning of the training, the tool use highlights the role of learning and experience either as a potential obstacle or as an asset for the new position. Hence, it makes it possible to establish the rate and the contents of the alternating training programme for each trainee. Moreover, it underscores the weight of the identity dynamics during this occupational change.

Keywords

Competence Development Competence Assessment Assessment Situation School Inspector Local Education Authority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Astier, P. (2009a). Travail et formation. In J.-M. Barbier, E. Bourgeois, G. Chapelle, & J.-C. Ruano-Borbalan (Dir.).Encyclopédie de la formation. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  2. Astier, P. (2009b). L’expérience, s’en sortir et en parler.Éducation Permanente, 180, 176–185.Google Scholar
  3. Barbier, J.-M. (1994).L’évaluation en formation. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1981/1990).The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Clot, Y. (1999).La fonction psychologique du travail. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  6. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripherical participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leontiev, A. N. (1979).Activity, consciousness, and personality. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Leplat, J. (1997).Regard sur l’activité en situation de travail. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  9. Leplat, J. (2001). Compétence et ergonomie. In J. Leplat & M. de Montmollin (Eds.),Les compétences en ergonomie (pp. 41–53). Toulouse: Octarès.Google Scholar
  10. Mayen, P., Pastré, P. & Vergnaud, G. (2006).Note de synthèse: La didactique professionnelle (Revue française de pédagogie, 154, pp. 145–198). Lyon: INRP.Google Scholar
  11. Olry, P., & Parage, P. (Eds.). (2008).Travail et formation: Quelques pratiques en émergence. Arcueil: Éducation Permanente. 174.Google Scholar
  12. Pastré, P., & Samurçay, R. (2004).Recherches en didactique professionnelle. Toulouse: Octarès.Google Scholar
  13. Petit, L. (2007). Fonction structurante de la discontinuité dans l’alternance.Éducation Permanente, 172, 89–97.Google Scholar
  14. Schuetze, H. G., & Sweet, R. (Eds.). (2003).Integrating school and workplace learning in Canada: Principles and practices of alternation education and training. Montréal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Vergnaud, G. (1996). Au fond de l’action, la conceptualisation. In J.-M. Barbier (Ed.),Savoirs théoriques et savoirs d’action (pp. 275–292). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  16. Vermersch, P. (1994).L’entretien d’explicitation. Paris: ESF.Google Scholar
  17. Vygostki, L. S. (1937/1986).Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Science and Practice in Education and TrainingUniversity Lumière-Lyon 2LyonFrance
  2. 2.Department of Education and Adult Training, SEFACueep-University of Lille 1LyonFrance

Personalised recommendations