Abstract
This chapter draws attention to the epistemology of practice, tacit knowledge and the limitations of using competences during rapid change and increasing complex working practices. Two ways of addressing this problem are suggested. The first is to replace competencies bylearning trajectories, and the second concerns thecreation and re-creation of mediating artefacts. These learning trajectories are key aspects of work, which together cover a range of achievements. They enable workers and employers to describe their work in the context of lifelong learning rather than the moment of formal qualifications. They also make it easier to develop a balance between individuals and organisations by encouraging progress and including personal qualities rarely used for qualifications. The second suggestion is to give more attention to the use of mediating artefacts in developing future expertise as well as confirming current practices. Althoughmediating artefacts are helpful for some stages of learning, they need to be regularlyre-created to address complex challenges and opportunities. The examples described in this chapter come from the author’s work with teachers, chartered accountants, nurses and doctors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This was mainly used by unemployed school leavers and unskilled workers who lost their jobs.
- 2.
This was mainly used by mid-career employees backed by their employers.
- 3.
The final stage before becoming an independent consultant.
References
Bolden, R., & Gosling, J. (2004, September).Leadership and management competencies: Lessons from the national occupational standards. Paper presented to BPS Social Psychology Section Conference, University of Exeter, Centre for Leadership Studies.
Engestrom, Y. (1987).Learning by expanding: An Activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engestrom, Y., Engestrom, R., & Kerosuo, H. (2003). The discursive construction of collaborative care.Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 286–315.
Eraut, M. (1997). Perspectives on defining ‘The Learning Society’.Journal of Education Policy, 12(6), 551–558.
Eraut, M. (1998). Concepts of competence.Journal of Interprofessional Care, 12(2), 127–139.
Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113–136.
Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace.Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273.
Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from other people in the workplace.Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 403–422.
Eraut, M. (2008).Evaluation of the introduction of the intercollegiate surgical curriculum programme. London: Royal College of Surgeons.
Eraut, M., & Hirsh, W. (2007).The significance of workplace learning for individuals, groups and organisations (SKOPE Monograph 6). Oxford: University of Oxford, SKOPE.
Eraut, M., Goad, L., & Smith, G. (1975).The analysis of curriculum materials. University of Sussex Education Area Occasional Paper 2, Sussex.
Eraut, M., Alderton, J., Boylan, A., & Wraight, A. (1995).Learning to use scientific knowledge in education and practice settings. London: English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting.
Eraut, M., Steadman, S., Trill, J., & Parkes, J. (1996).The assessment of NVQs (Research Report No. 4). Sussex: University of Sussex Institute of Education.
Eraut, M., Alderton, J., Cole, G., & Senker, P. (1998). Learning from other people at work. In F. Coffield (Ed.),Learning at work. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Eraut, M., Steadman, S., & James, J. (2001).Evaluation of higher level nVQs (Research Report No. 9). Sussex: University of Sussex Institute of Education.
Eraut, M., Maillardet, F., Miller, C., Steadman, S., Ali, A., Blackman, C., & Furner, J. (2005).What is learned in the workplace and how? Typologies and results from a cross-professional longitudinal study. EARLI biannual conference, Nicosia.
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.),Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.). (1993).Decision-making in action, models and methods. Norwood: Ablex.
Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.),Teams: Their thinking and performance. Norwood: Ablex.
Steadman, S., Eraut, M., Maillardet, F., Miller, C., Furner, J., Ali, A., & Blackman, C. (2005).Methodological challenges in studying workplace learning: strengths and limitations of the adopted approach. Paper for BERA Annual Conference, Pontypridd.
Weick, K. E. (1983). Managerial thought in the context of action. In C. Srivastva (Ed.),The executive mind. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eraut, M. (2013). Developing Complex Performance Through Learning Trajectories and Re-creating Mediating Artefacts. In: Deitmer, L., Hauschildt, U., Rauner, F., Zelloth, H. (eds) The Architecture of Innovative Apprenticeship. Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5398-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5398-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5397-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5398-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)