Skip to main content

Promoting Competency-Based Language Teaching Through Project-Based Language Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Educational Linguistics ((EDUL,volume 14))

Abstract

This chapter provides a rationale for how project-based language learning (PBLL) can play a key role in language teaching and what this implies for teachers and learners. PBLL not only allows for a practical and meaningful approach to teaching and assessing language learning; it also promotes effective learning strategies and critical thinking skills. First, the main criteria for competences are examined along with links to the underlying premises of learning in PBLL. Next, the chapter delves into the question of communicative competences and explores ways of integrating the notion of competences and PBLL to design and implement language learning activities in different scenarios. An example of a multiple-pronged, bi-focal PBLL design illustrates how PBLL can be successfully implemented at all levels of education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This PBLL example was originally designed for a Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) school placement tutorial session and for students training to become geography teachers, as part of the Comenius project entitled MICALL: Moderating Intercultural Collaboration and Language Learning (118762-CP-1-2004-NL-Comenius 2.1). The author of this example is Melinda Dooly (Department of Language Teaching Methodology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra).

  2. 2.

    Town twinning was developed in Europe, after World War II, as a way of creating friendship ties and understanding between countries affected by the war. It is now quite popular world-wide.

  3. 3.

    As future teachers, the students are expected to take part in placement teaching where they are responsible for overseeing the implementation of the previously described primary education PBLL projects.

References

  • Arlington Education and Employment Program (AEEP/REEP). 1997. Project-based learning and assessment. A reesource manual for teachers. Arlington: Arlington Public Schools. Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED442306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, G.H., and P. Chamness Miller (eds.). 2006. Project-based second and foreign language education. Past, present, and future. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, G., and T. Slater. 2005. The project framework: A tool for language, content, and skills integration. ELT Journal 59(2): 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, M., and R. Smith. 1998. Developing the credit-based modular curriculum in higher education. Bristol: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck Institute for Education. 2003. Project based learning handbook. A guide to standards-focused project based learning for middle and high school teachers, 2nd ed. Hong Kong: QuinnEssentials Books & Printing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bygate, M., P. Skehan, and M. Swain. 2001. Introduction. In Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and assessment, ed. M. Bygate, P. Skehan, and M. Swain, 1–20. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. 1916. Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooly, M. (ed.). 2008. Telecollaborative language learning. A guidebook to moderating intercultural collaboration online. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooly, M., and D. Masats. 2010. Closing the loop between theory and praxis: New models in EFL teaching. ELT Journal 65(1): 42–51. ELT Journal Advance Access http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/ccq017. 21 June 2010: To be published in paper version in 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. 2003. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, M. 2006. The use and mis-use of competence frameworks and statements with particular attention to describing achievement in literature. In Towards a common European framework of reference for languages of school education? selected conference papers, ed. W. Martyniuk, 47–59. Krakow: Jagiellonian University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried-Booth, D.L. 2002. Project work, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, O. 2007. War and peace with young children. In The challenge of teaching controversial issues, ed. H. Claire and C. Holden, 27–39. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D., and J. Gumperz (eds.). 1964. The ethnography of communication, American Anthropologist, vol. 66(6), Part 2. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwahama, R., and T. Asada. 2006. A model of school system to develop the school-based curriculum and support CPD using reflection and action research. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, 6–9 Sept, University of Warwick. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/159421.htm. Accessed 17 July 2010.

  • Levine, G.S. 2004. Global simulation: A student-centered, task-based format for intermediate foreign language courses. Foreign Language Annals 37: 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, D., H.P. Hodel, V. Kohonen, D. Meijer, and R. Perclová. 2007. Preparing teachers to use the European language portfolio – Arguments, materials and resources. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages/Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M.H. 1985. A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In Modeling and assessing second language development, ed. K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann, 77–99. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, R. 2003. Authentic, performance-based assessment in ESL/EFL reading instruction. Asian EFL Journal. The EFL Professional Written Forum, Dec. 1–28, 5(4): 7–35. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/dec_03_sub.rl.php. Accessed 16 June 2010.

  • Masats, D., L. Nussbaum, and V. Unamuno. 2007. When activity shapes the repertoire of second language learners. In EUROSLA yearbook 7, ed. L. Roberts, A. Gürel, S. Tatar, and L. Marti, 121–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU). 2006. Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning (2006/962/EC) 30 December 2006/L394. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/l_394/l_39420061230en00100018.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2010.

  • Richards, J.C. 2005. Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J.C., and T.S. Rodgers. 1986. Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seedhouse, P. 2004. The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, F.L. 2006. Establishing a theoretical foundation for project-based learning in second and foreign language contexts. In Project-based second and foreign language education. Past, present, and future, ed. G.H. Beckett and P. Chamness Miller, 19–40. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharpe, R.G., and R. Gallimore. 1988. Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning and schooling in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsiplakides, I., and I. Fragoulis. 2009. Project-based learning in the teaching of English as a foreign language in Greek primary schools: From theory to practice. English Language Teaching 2(3): 113–119. http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/viewFile/2739/3286. Accessed 5 Apr 2010.

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. 2001. Defining and assessing learning: Exploring competency-based initiatives (authored by E. Jones, R.A., Voorhees, and K. Paulson for the Council of the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Competency-Based Initiatives Working Group). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, R.A. 2001. Competency-based learning models: A necessary future. New Directions for Institutional Research 110: 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melinda Dooly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dooly, M. (2013). Promoting Competency-Based Language Teaching Through Project-Based Language Learning. In: Pérez Cañado, M. (eds) Competency-based Language Teaching in Higher Education. Educational Linguistics, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5386-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics