Skip to main content

Influence of Infill Panels on the Seismic Response of Existing RC Buildings: A Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 24))

Abstract

An analytical evaluation of the seismic response of irregular RC buildings with infill panels designed without considering modern seismic provisions is presented in this chapter. Many RC buildings have been built in the 1960s and 1970s in Italy (and many other countries), before the seismic code was issued. Such buildings are usually irregular, due to mass and stiffness distribution, and they exhibit torsional effects when subjected to horizontal loads. One of the factors contributing to the torsional effects is the infill panels built on the perimeter of structures. Usually there is no discontinuity between the structure and the infill, so that the stiffness of the structure is largely affected by the distribution of the infill walls that can be irregular both in plan and in elevation. This work presents the effect of masonry infill in the seismic response of precode RC buildings. A numerical analysis has been performed on a case study, simulating the seismic response of the structure, including masonry infill panels. The case study of an existing building, rectangular in plan, having a mild mass eccentricity and an irregular distribution of infill panels, and, therefore, a different eccentricity at each storey is selected for the evaluation. The seismic performance of the building has been evaluated comparing the seismic response with the limit conditions provided by Italian Technical Code, both in terms of interstorey drift and shear capacity. The seismic response of the case-study building is satisfactory in respect to deformation parameters (chord rotation, top displacement, interstorey drift) but exhibits an unacceptable amount of shear in some of the elements, experiencing “short-column” failures. A possible solution for the problem is proposed, by removing some of the partial infill panels, in order to reduce the shear concentration demands and eccentricity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Circ. Min. 2 febbraio 2009, n. 617 – Istruzioni per l’applicazione delle 'Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni' di cui al decreto ministeriale 14 gennaio 2008 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Pres. Rep. Del 25/011962 n (1684) Provvedimenti per l’edilizia, con particolari prescrizioni per le zone sismiche (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • D.M. 14 Gennaio (2008) Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni (NTC). G.U. n. 29 del 04/02/2008, Suppl. Ord. N. 30 (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambrisi A, De Stefano M, Tanganelli M, Viti S (2010) Seismic performance of irregular existing RC framed structures. In: Proceedings of the 14th ECEE, Ohrid, 30 Aug–3 Sept 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28:979–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legge 5/11/1971 n. 1086 (1971) Norme per la disciplina delle opere in conglomerato cementizio armato, normale e precompresso ed a struttura metallica (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge 2/2/1974 n. 64 (1974) Provvedimenti per le costruzioni con particolari prescrizioni per le zone sismiche. G.U. del 21/04/1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhorn A (1997) Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations. In: Krawinkler H, Fajfar P (eds) Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes. Balkema, Lisse, pp 277–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Seismostruct v5.2.1 released (2011) Computer code, Finite Element package. (http://seismosoft.com)

  • Viti S, Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM (2006) Retrofit of a hospital through strength reduction and enhanced damping. Smart Struct Syst 2(4):339–355

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the project DPC-ReLUIS 2010/2013 Task 1.1.2. “Strutture in cemento armato ordinarie e prefabricate.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario De Stefano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tanganelli, M., Viti, S., De Stefano, M., Reinhorn, A.M. (2013). Influence of Infill Panels on the Seismic Response of Existing RC Buildings: A Case Study. In: Lavan, O., De Stefano, M. (eds) Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5377-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics