Abstract
Nonlinear static methods are not always effective in the assessment of three-dimensional building structures because their estimate of the torsional response is not always reliable. To overcome this shortcoming, some of the authors have proposed a double application of the nonlinear static analysis by means of lateral forces applied to points of the deck characterised by different eccentricities with respect to the centre of mass. These eccentricities, named “corrective eccentricities”, were calibrated in such a way that the displacements of the edges of the deck evaluated by the two nonlinear static analyses equal those evaluated by nonlinear dynamic analysis. Analytical expressions of the corrective eccentricities were derived and presented in a previous study based on a parametrical investigation conducted on a wide set of one-storey systems subjected to bidirectional ground motions. In this chapter, the peculiarities of the application of the proposed nonlinear static method to multistorey buildings are discussed first. Second, as an example, the method is applied to predict the seismic response of a five-storey asymmetric building. The structure of the analysed building is constituted by reinforced concrete frames arranged along two orthogonal directions. The cross sections of the structural element are equal at all storeys. To test the effectiveness of the proposed method, the in-plan distributions of the deck displacement and drift are evaluated by nonlinear dynamic analysis and compared to those resulting from the nonlinear static method with corrective eccentricities. The obtained results show that the use of the corrective eccentricities leads to a suitable estimate of the maximum dynamic displacements and drifts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anagnostopoulos SA, Alexopoulou C, Stathopoulos KG (2010) An answer to an important controversy and the need for caution when using simple models to predict inelastic earthquake response of buildings with torsion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39:521–540
Bosco M, Marino EM, Rossi PP (2008a) An analytical approach for the evaluation of the in-plan irregularity of real buildings. In: Proceedings of the 5th European workshop on the seismic behavior of Irregular and Complex Structures, Catania, Italy
Bosco M, Camata G, De Stefano M, Ghersi A, Lucchini A, Maddaloni G, Magliulo G, Marino I, Martinelli E, Monti G, Petti L, Saetta A, Spacone E, Trombetti T (2008b) Linee guida per le analisi nonlineari di edifici esistenti in cemento armato. In: Proceedings of the conference “Valutazione e riduzione della vulnerabilità sismica di edifici esistenti in c.a.”, Rome, Italy (in Italian)
Bosco M, Ghersi A, Leanza S (2008c) Force-displacement relationships for R/C members in seismic design. In: Proceeding of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China
Bosco M, Ferrara G, Ghersi A, Marino EM (2009a) Corrective eccentricities for the evaluation of the seismic response of one-storey asymmetric systems by nonlinear static analysis. Environ Semeiot 2:80–94. doi:10.3383/es.2.2.2
Bosco M, Ghersi A, Marino EM (2009b) On the evaluation of seismic response of structures by nonlinear static methods. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38:1465–1482
Bosco M, Ghersi A, Marino EM (2012) Corrective eccentricities for assessment by the nonlinear static method of 3D structures subjected to bidirectional ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41:1751–1773
Chopra AK, Goel RK (2004) A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33:903–927
De Stefano M, Marino EM, Rossi PP (2006) Effect of overstrength on the seismic behaviour of multi-storey regularly asymmetric buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4:23–42
De Stefano M, Pintucchi B (2010) Predicting torsion-induced lateral displacements for push-over analysis: influence of torsional system characteristics. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39:1369–1394
Fajfar P, Marušić D, Perus I (2005) Torsional effects in the pushover-based seismic analysis of buildings. J Earthq Eng 9:831–854
Ghersi A, Marino EM, Rossi PP (2007) Static versus modal analysis: influence on inelastic response of multi-storey asymmetric buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 5:511–532
Goel RK, Chopra AK (1990) Inelastic seismic response of one-story asymmetric-plan systems, Report no. UCB/EERC-90/14, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, USA
Hejal R, Chopra AK (1987) Earthquake response of torsionally-coupled buildings, Report no. UBC/EERC-87/20, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, USA
Lucchini A, Monti G, Kunnath S (2009) Seismic behavior of single-story asymmetric-plan buildings under uniaxial excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38:1053–1070
Makarios T, Anastassiadis K (1998a) Real and fictitious elastic axes of multi-storey buildings: theory. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 7:33–55
Makarios T, Anastassiadis K (1998b) Real and fictitious elastic axes of multi-storey buildings: applications. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 7:57–71
Marino EM, Rossi PP (2004) Exact evaluation of the location of the optimum torsion axis. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 13:277–290
Marušić D, Fajfar P (2005) On the inelastic seismic response of asymmetric buildings under bi-axial excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34:943–963
Tso WK (1990) Static eccentricity concept for torsional moment estimations. J Struct Eng 116:1199–1212
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bosco, M., Ferrara, G.A., Ghersi, A., Marino, E.M., Rossi, P.P. (2013). Application of Nonlinear Static Method with Corrective Eccentricities to Multistorey Buildings: A Case Study. In: Lavan, O., De Stefano, M. (eds) Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5377-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5377-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5376-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5377-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)