Skip to main content

Correlation of Students’ Estimation and Laboratory Determination of Soil Texture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2632 Accesses

Abstract

Soil texture helps understand physical and chemical properties of soils. Soil texture can be determined accurately in the laboratory, or it can be estimated through finger test in the field, the accuracy of the latter depends on the skills and experience of the person. However, such estimates provide quick results compared to laboratory measurement, which takes ample amount of time for final results. In an attempt to correlate field and laboratory soil texture results, 11 students were trained to develop their skills to determine field soil texture (finger test) and in determining soil texture in the laboratory using standard hydrometer method. When the finger test results were compared with the laboratory results, the students’ estimates predicted the actual clay and sand percentages with high degree of accuracy. The results showed a high variation between student’s and laboratory determination of soil texture. Estimation of sand fraction is slightly more difficult than clay particles. This study suggests that students require more practice to be able to estimate soil textural class accurately. It is recommended that students should use reference samples (known texture) to improve their skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bouyoucos GJ (1927) The hydrometer as a new method for the mechanical analysis of soils. J Soil Sci 23:343–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burt R (ed) (2004) Soil survey laboratory methods manual. United Stated Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil survey investigations report 42, version 4.0

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper TH (1990) Development of students’ abilities to match soil color to Munsell color chips. J Agron Educ 19:141–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss JE, Wright WR, Coles RH (1975) Testing the accuracy of field textures. Scientific article no A2012 of the Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 39:800–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1, 2nd edn. Agronomy monograph, vol 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 383–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs HS, Reed RM, Thien SJ, Withe LV (1971) Soil laboratory exercise source book. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, p 126

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettler TA, Doran JW, Gilbert TL (2001) A simplified method for soil particle size determination to accompany soil quality analyses. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:849–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levine SJ, Post DF, Ellsworth TJ (1989) An evaluation of student proficiency in field estimation of soil texture. J Agron Educ 18(2):100–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Post DF, Huete AR, Pease DS (1986) A comparison of soil scientist estimations and laboratory determinations of some Arizona soil properties. J Soil Water Conserv 41(6):421–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Post DF, Levine SJ, Bryant RB, Mays MD, Batchily AK, Escadafal R, Huete AR (1993) Correlations between field and laboratory measurements of soil color. In: Bigham JM, Ciolkosz EJ (eds) Soil color. Soil Sci Soc Am Spec publication 31. SSSA, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Post DF, Ferreira LG, Rapp R (1999) Evaluating the skill of soil scientists to determine soil texture, stickiness, and plasticity. In: Soil Science Society of North Carolina proceedings XLII, Raleigh, pp 94–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Post DF, Rapp R, Ferreira L (2001) Quantitative field estimations of stickiness and plasticity for predicting WEPP Model parameters. In: Stott DE, Mohtar RH, Steinhardt GC (eds) Sustaining the global farm: 10th international Soil Conservation Organization meeting, Purdue University, pp 896–902, 24–29 May

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Division Staff (2003) Soil survey manual, Agricultural handbook 18. USDA-NRCS. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Thien SJ (1979) A flow diagram for teaching texture by feel analysis. J Agron Educ 8:54–55

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed S. Alhammadi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alhammadi, M.S., Gheblawi, M.S. (2013). Correlation of Students’ Estimation and Laboratory Determination of Soil Texture. In: Shahid, S., Taha, F., Abdelfattah, M. (eds) Developments in Soil Classification, Land Use Planning and Policy Implications. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5332-7_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics