Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Dynamic Failure of Composite and Sandwich Structures pp 209–289Cite as

Damage Mechanisms and Energy Absorption in Composite Laminates Under Low Velocity Impact Loads

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Solid Mechanics and Its Applications ((SMIA,volume 192))

Abstract

An extensive study of the behaviour of composite laminates subjected to dynamic loads was carried out by the authors many years in order to understand the complex mechanisms of damage initiation and propagation under low velocity impact loads. A review of the main results is hereafter presented.

The problem is that many parameters are involved in an impact and the induced damage is very complex and not always visible. The present research efforts were undertaken to supply semi empirical and analytical models for the prediction of the impact response in terms of load curve, damage, involved energies and forces, independently of the particular laminate, its thickness and stacking sequence, matrix type and content, fibre type and architecture, fibre orientations and impact conditions such as tup and support diameter, load speed.

Experimental tests were carried out on different material systems varying the initial kinetic energy until the complete penetration. This allows the study of the start and propagation of the failure modes. From the load-deflection curves recorded, all the impact parameters involved like first failure and maximum load and energy, absorbed and penetration energy, were obtained. The influence of the thickness and stacking sequence so that the composite system, constrain condition and tup diameter on the impact parameters was evaluated. Destructive and non-destructive techniques were adopted to investigate the failure modes and the observed damage was correlated to the relative energies.

The analysis highlighted the importance of the penetration energy, Up. An elastic solution available for circular isotropic plates loaded at the centre was modified to model the indentation and applied to the prediction of the load-displacement curve necessary to know the energy that cause the first failure. Interestingly, the force required for damage initiation under form of delamination was found to increase at the increasing of the thickness, t, following a power law whose exponent is very close to 1.5 of the contact law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sun CT, Liou WJ (1989) Investigation of laminated composite plates under impact dynamic loading using a three-dimensional hybrid stress finite element method. Comput Struct 33(3):879–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cairns DS (1991) Simple elasto-plastic contact laws for composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 10(4):423–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bucinell RB, Nuismer RJ, Koury JL (1991) Response of composite plates to quasi-static impact events. In: O’Brien TK (ed) Composite materials: fatigue and fracture. ASTM STP 1110., pp 528–549

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abrate S (1994) Impact on laminated composites: recent advances. Appl Mech Rev 47(11):517–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hong S, Liu D (1989) On the relationship between impact energy and delamination area. Exp Mech 29(2):115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hull D, Shi YB (1993) Damage mechanism characterisation in composite damage tolerance investigations. Compos Struct 23:99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hitchen SA, Kemp RMJ (1995) The effect of stacking sequence on impact damage in a carbon fibre/epoxy composite. Composites 26:207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Richardson MOW, Wisheart MJ (1996) Review of low-velocity impact properties of composite materials. Composites A 27A:1123–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Caprino G (1984) Residual strength prediction of impacted CFRP laminates. J Compos Mater 18:508–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cantwell WJ, Morton J (1991) The impact resistance of composite materials – a review. Composites 22(5):347–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cairns DS, Minuet PJ, Abdallah MG (1993) Theoretical and experimental response of composite laminates with delaminations loaded in compression. Compos Struct 25:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim J-K, Mackay DB, Mai Y-W (1993) Drop-weight impact damage tolerance of CFRP with rubber-modified epoxy matrix. Composites 24(6):485–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi HY, Downs RJ, Chang F-K (1991) A new approach toward understanding damage mechanisms and mechanics of laminated composites due to low velocity impact: part I-experiments. J Comp Mater 25:992–1011

    Google Scholar 

  14. Choi HY, Chang FK (1992) A model for predicting damage in graphite/epoxy laminated composites resulting from low-velocity point impact. J Compos Mater 26(14):2134–2169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abrate S (1998) Impact on composite structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Timoshenko SP, Woinowsky-Krieger S (1959) Theory of plates and shells. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  17. Caprino G, Lopresto V (2000) The significance of indentation in the inspection of CFRP panels damaged by low-velocity impact. Compos Sci Technol 60:1003–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang FK, Choi HY, Wang HS (1990) Damage of laminated composites due to low velocity impact. In: 31st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and Materials conference, Long Beach, CA, 2–4 April 1990, pp 930–940

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cantwell WJ, Morton J (1990) Impact perforation of carbon fibre reinforced plastics. Compos Sci Technol 38:119–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Husman GE, Whitney JM, Halpin JC (1975) Residual strength characterisation of laminated composites subjected to impact loading. ASTM STP 568:92–113

    Google Scholar 

  21. Delfosse D, Poursartip A (1985) Experimental parameter study of static and dynamic out-of-plane loading of CFRP laminates. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on composite materials (ICCM10), Whistler, Canada, August 1985, pp V-583-590

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bibo G, Leicy D, Hogg PJ, Kemp M (1994) High-temperature damage tolerance of carbon fibre-reinforced plastics. Part 1: impact characteristics. Composites 25(6):414–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bibo GA, Hogg PJ (1998) Influence of reinforcement architecture on damage mechanisms and residual strength of glass-fibre/epoxy composite systems. Compos Sci Technol 58:803–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Caprino G, Lopresto V, Scarponi C, Briotti G (1999) Influence of material thickness on the response of carbon-fabric/epoxy panels to low-velocity impact. Compos Sci Technol 59:2279–2286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghasemi Nejhad MN, Parvizi-Majidi A (1990) Impact behaviour and damage tolerance of woven carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites. Composites 21(2):155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Caprino G, Langella A, Lopresto V (2002) Elastic behaviour of circular composite plates transversely loaded at the centre. Composites A 33:1191–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schoeppner GA, Abrate S (2000) Delamination threshold loads for low velocity impact on composite laminates. Composites A 31:903–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sjoblom PO, Hartness TM, Cordell TM (1988) On low-velocity impact testing of composite materials. J Compos Mater 22(1):30–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Delfosse D, Poursatip A (1997) Energy-based approach to impact damage in CFRP laminates. Composites A 28A:647–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu S, Kutlu Z, Chang FK (1993) Matrix cracking and delamination propagation in laminated composites subjected to transversely concentrated loading. J Compos Mater 27(5):436–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Herup EJ, Palazotto AN (1997) Low-velocity impact damage initiation in graphite/epoxy/Nomex honeycomb-sandwiche plates. Compos Sci Technol 57(12):282–289

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yang SH, Sun CT (1982) Indentation law for composite laminates. In: Daniel I (ed) Composite materials: testing and design (sixth conference), ASTM STP 787, pp 425–449

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tan TM, Sun CT (1985) Use of statical indentation laws in the impact analysis of laminated composite plates. J Appl Mech 52(8):6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jackson WC, Poe CC Jr (1993) The use of impact force as a scale parameter for the impact response of composite laminates. J Compos Technol Res 15(4):282–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Abrate S (2001) Modeling of impacts on composite structures. Compos Struct 51:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Timoshenko SP Strength of materials. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chang FK, Choi HY, Wang HS (1990) Damage of laminated composites due to low velocity impact. In: 31st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Long Beach, CA, 2–4 April 1990, pp 930–940

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stout MG, Koss DA, Liu C, Idasetima J (1999) Damage development in carbon/epoxy laminates under quasi-static and dynamic loading. Compos Sci Technol 59:2339–2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gosse JH, Mori PBY (1988) Impact damage characterization of graphite/epoxy laminates. In: Proceedings of the 3rd technical conference of the American Society for Composites, Seattle, WA, pp 334–353

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tsai SW, Hahn HT (1975) Introduction to composite materials. Technomic Publishing Company, Lancaster

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hashin Z (1975) Failure criteria of unidirectional fiber composites. J Appl Mech 47:329–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu S (1994) Quasi impact damage initiation and growth of thick-section and toughened composite materials. Int J Solids Struct 31(22):3079–3098

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Siow YP, Shim PW (1998) An experimental study of low velocity impact damage in woven fiber composites. J Compos Mater 32(12):1178–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kaczmerek H (1995) Ultrasonic detection of damage in CFRPs. J Compos Mater 29:59–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hosur MV, Murthy CRL, Ramamurthy TS, Shet A (1998) Estimation of impact-induced damage in CFRP laminates through ultrasonic imaging. NDT&E Int 31:359–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Olsson R (2001) Analytical prediction of large mass impact damage in composite laminates. Composites A 32:1207–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sjoblom P (1987) Simple design approach against low velocity impact damage. In: Proceedings of 32nd SAMPE symposium, Anaheim, CA, pp 529–539

    Google Scholar 

  48. Caprino G, Langella A, Lopresto V (2003) Prediction of the first failure energy of circular carbon fibre reinforced plastic plates loaded at the centre. Composites A 34:349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang X (1998) Impact damage in composite aircraft structures-experimental testing and numerical simulation. Proc Inst Mech Eng 212(4):245–259

    Google Scholar 

  50. Davies GAO, Zhang X, Zhou G, Watson S (1994) Numerical modelling of impact damage. Composites 25(5):342–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Davies GAO, Zhang X (1995) Impact damage prediction in carbon composite structures. Int J Impact Eng 16(1):149–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Olsson R (1999) A review of impact experiments at FFA during 1986 to 1998. The Aeronautical Research Institute of Sweden, FFA TN 1999–08

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lesser AJ, Filippov AG (1991) Kinetics of damage mechanisms in laminated composites. In: International SAMPE symposium and exhibition, vol 36, part 1, pp 886–900

    Google Scholar 

  54. Crivelli Visconti I, Caprino G, Di Ilio A, Carrino L (1983) Impact tests on CFRP: a static-dynamic analogy. In: High performance composite materials – new applications and industrial production, acts of 4th international SAMPE conference-SAMPE Euro chapter, Bordeaux, 17–20 October 1983, pp 189–196

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lesser AJ, Filippov AG (1991) Kinetics of damage mechanisms in laminated composites. In: International SAMPE symposium and exhibition, vol 36, part 1, pp 886–900

    Google Scholar 

  56. Srinivasan K, Jackson WC, Hinkley JA (1991) Response of composite materials to low velocity impact. In: International SAMPE symposium and exhibition, vol 36, part 2, pp 850–862

    Google Scholar 

  57. Shivakumar KN, Elber W, Illg W (1985) Prediction of low velocity impact damage in thin circular laminates. AIAA J 23(3):442–449

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Caprino G, Crivelli Visconti I, Di Ilio A (1984) Composite materials response under low-velocity impact. Compos Struct 2:261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wu E, TSai CZ, Chen YC (1994) Penetration into glass/epoxy composite laminates. J Compos Mater 28:1783–1802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Zenkour AM, Mashat DS (2009) Exact solutions for variable-thickness inhomogeneous elastic plates under various boundary conditions. Meccanica 44(4):433–447

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Agarwal BD, Broutman LJ (1980) Analysis and performance of fiber composites. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  62. Grediac M (1999) A procedure for designing laminated plates with required stiffness properties. Application to thin quasi-isotropic quasi-homogeneous uncoupled laminates. J Compos Mater 33:1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Park JW, Kim YH (1999) Predictor-corrector procedure for displacements, stresses and their sensitivity coefficients in composite panels. J Compos Mater 33:1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang CM, Reddy JN, Lee KH (2000) Shear deformable beams and plates. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Scarponi C, Briotti G, Barboni R, Marcone A, Iannone M (1996) Impact testing on composite laminates and sandwich panels. J Compos Mater 30(17):1873–1911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lagace PA, Wolf E (1993). Impact damage resistance of several laminated material systems. In: 34th AIAA structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, La Jolla, CA, Pt. 4, pp 1863–1872

    Google Scholar 

  67. Lopresto V, Caprino G (2002) Elastic response of circular CFRP plates under low-velocity impact. In: Proceedings of ECCM10, 3–7 giugno 2002, Bruge, Belgio

    Google Scholar 

  68. Sun CT, Chen JK (1985) On the impact of initially stressed composite laminates. J Compos Mater 19:490–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Davies GAO, Hitchings D, Wang J (2000) Prediction of threshold impact energy for onset of delamination in quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy composite laminates under low-velocity impact. Compos Sci Technol 60:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Cartiè DDR, Irving PE (2002) Effect of resin and fibre properties on impact and compression after impact performance of CFRP. Composites A 33:483–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Lopresto V, Melito V, Leone C, Caprino G (2006) Effect of stitches on the impact behaviour of graphite/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 66/2:233–239

    Google Scholar 

  72. Lagace PA, Williamson JE, Tsang PHW, Wolf E, Thomas SA (1993) A preliminary proposition for a test method to measure (impact) damage resistance. J Reinf Plast Compos 12(5):584–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Poe Jr CC (1991) Relevance of impacter shape to non visible damage and residual tensile strength of a thick graphite/epoxy laminate. In: O’Brien TK (ed) Composite materials: fatigue and fracture, vol 3, ASTM STP 1110. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp 501–527

    Google Scholar 

  74. Sutherland LS, Guedes Soares C (2005) Impact on low fibre-volume, glass/polyester rectangular plates. Compos Struct 68:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wardle MW, Tokarsky EW (1983) Drop weight impact testing of laminates reinforced with Kevlar aramid fibres, E-glass and graphite. Compos Technol Rev 5(1):4–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Hsieh CY, Mount A, Jang BZ, Zee RH (1990) Response of polymer composites to high and low velocity impact. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international SAMPE technical conference, 6–8 November 1990, pp 14–27

    Google Scholar 

  77. Caprino G, Lopresto V (2000) Factors affecting the penetration energy of glass fibre reinforced plastics subjected to a concentrated transverse load. In: ECCM–9, Brighton, 4–7 June 2000

    Google Scholar 

  78. Babic L, Dunn C, Hogg PJ (1989) Damage development and its significance in GRP subjected to impact. Plast Rubb Process Appl 12(4):199–207

    Google Scholar 

  79. Cantwell WJ, Morton J (1989) The influence of varying projectile mass on the impact response of CFRP. Compos Struct 13:101–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Caprino G (1989) Results of instrumented drop-weight impact tests on polycarbonate and glass fibre reinforced plastics panels. Istituto Donegani internal report

    Google Scholar 

  81. Strait LH, Karasek ML, Amateau MF (1992) Effects of stacking sequence on the impact resistance of fiber reinforced thermoplastic toughened epoxy laminates. J Compos Mater 26(12):1725–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Chotard TJ, Benzeggagh ML (1998) On the mechanical behaviour of pultruded sections submitted to low-velocity impact. Compos Sci Technol 58(6):839–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Wu E, Shyu K (1993) Response of composite laminates to contact loads and relationship to low-velocity impact. J Compos Mater 27(15):1443–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Wang H, Vu-Khanh T (1994) J Compos Mater 28:684

    Google Scholar 

  85. Cantwell WJ, Morton J (1990) An assessment of the residual strength of an impact-damaged carbon fibre reinforced epoxy. Compos Struct 14:303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Ilcewicz I (1997). Impact damage in composite structures. Polymer matrix composites, MIL- handbook 17

    Google Scholar 

  87. Davidson BD, Kumar M, Soffa MA (2009) Influence of mode ratio and hygrothermal condition on the delamination toughness of a thermoplastic particulate interlayered carbon/epoxy composite. Composites A 40:67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Scarponi C, Briotti G, Barboni R (1999) Reduction of tensile strength in angle-ply composite laminates due to low-velocity impact. J Reinf Plast Compos 18(1):63–85

    Google Scholar 

  89. Morton J, Godwin EW (1989) Impact response of tough carbon fibre composites. Compos Struct 13:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Liu D (1988) Impact-induced delamination – a view of bending stiffness mismatching. J Compos Mater 22:674–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Kumar P, Rai B (1993) Delaminations of barely visible impact damage in CFRP laminates. Compos Struct 23:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Materials and Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, P.le Tecchio 80, 80125, Naples, Italy

    V. Lopresto & G. Caprino

Authors
  1. V. Lopresto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Caprino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Lopresto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering and, Southern Illinois University, Lincoln Drive 2030, Carbondale, 62901-6603, Illinois, USA

    Serge Abrate

  2. INSA Toulouse, Institut Clément Ader, Avenue de Rangueil 135, Toulouse Cedex 4, 31077, France

    Bruno Castanié

  3. Program Manager, Solid Mechanics, One Liberty Center (Suite 1425), Office of Naval Research (ONR 332), North Randolph Street 875, Arlington, 22203-1995, Virginia, USA

    Yapa D. S. Rajapakse

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lopresto, V., Caprino, G. (2013). Damage Mechanisms and Energy Absorption in Composite Laminates Under Low Velocity Impact Loads. In: Abrate, S., Castanié, B., Rajapakse, Y. (eds) Dynamic Failure of Composite and Sandwich Structures. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 192. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5329-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5329-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5328-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5329-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation