Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Different Kinds of Specificity Across Languages

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 92))

Abstract

This volume comprises a selection of articles that are based on papers presented at the workshop ‘Funny Indefinites – Different Kinds of Specificity Across Languages’, which took place at the Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (ZAS) in Berlin in July 2007. The aim of the workshop was twofold: on the one hand, we wanted to broaden the empirical coverage of the discussion of specificity by taking languages into account in which specificity markers exist whose properties have either not been described at all or not in any detail. In particular, we paid close attention to subtle differences between specificity markers concerning their scopal properties, identification requirements, etc. On the other hand, we hoped that by learning more about the variety as well as about common properties among specificity markers, a clearer understanding of what the notion of specificity actually comes down to would emerge. As the reader can verify for herself, we are still a good deal away from an understanding of specificity that encompasses and systematically relates all the dimensions along which specificity markers in and across languages vary. Nevertheless, we think that the papers collected in this volume contain many important observations and theoretical ideas that will bring us closer to such a goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abusch, D., and M. Rooth. 1997. Epistemic NP modifiers. In Proceedings of SALT 7, ed. A. Lawson, 1–18. Cornell: CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aloni, M. 2001. Quantification under conceptual covers. Ph.D thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aloni, M. 2008. Concealed questions under cover. In Knowledge and questions, ed. F. Lihoreau, GrazerPhilosophischeStudien 77: 191–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Ovalle, L. 2009. Counterfactuals, correlatives and disjunction. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 207–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C.L. 1966. Definiteness and indefiniteness in English. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. 2001. A puzzle about indefinites. In Semantic interfaces: Reference, anaphora and aspect, eds. C. Checchetto, G. Chierchia, and M.-T. Guasti, 51–89. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresti, D. 1995. Indefinite topics. Ph.D thesis, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, C., C. Endriss., and S. Hinterwimmer. 2008. Intermediate scope readings as embedded speech acts. In Proceedings of SuB 12, ed. A. Grønn, 122–136. Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endriss, C. 2009. Quantificational topics – A scopal treatment of exceptional wide scope phenomena, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 86. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, D. 1981. Quantifier scope and syntactic islands. In Proceedings of CLS7, 59–66. Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, D. 2002a. Specificity distinctions. Journal of Semantics 19: 213–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, D. 2002b. Varieties of indefinites. In Proceedings of SALT 12, Ithaca, ed. B. Jackson, 59–83. Cornell: CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J., and I. Sag. 1982. Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 355–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. 1986. The semantics of a certain. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 331–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, N. 1984. Interpreting quantification in natural language. Synthese 59: 117–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ionin, T. 2006. This is definitely specific: Specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural Language Semantics 14: 175–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ionin, T. 2010a. The scope of indefinites: An experimental investigation. Natural Language Semantics 18: 295–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ionin, T. 2010b. An experimental study on the scope of (un)modified indefinites. International Review of Pragmatics 2: 228–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayez, J., and L.M. Tovena. 2002. Determiners and (un)certainty. In Proceedings of SALT 12, 164–183. Cornell: CLC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayez, J., and L.M. Tovena. 2006. Epistemic determiners. Journal of Semantics 23: 217–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L. 1968. What do referential indices refer to? Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L. 1969/1976. Discourse referents. In Proceedings of the 1969 conference on computational linguistics. Sång-Säby, Sweden, 1–38, Reprinted in: J. McCawley (Ed.). 1976. Syntax and semantics 7: Notes from the linguistic underground. New York: Academic Press, 363–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A. 1998. Scope or pseudo-scope? Are there wide-scope indefinites? In Events and grammar, ed. S.D. Rothstein, 163–196. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A., and J. Shimoyama. 2002. Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In The proceedings of the third Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics (TCP 2002), ed. Y. Otsu, 1–25. Tokyo: HituziSyobo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martí, L. 2007. Restoring indefinites to normalcy: An experimental study on the scope of Spanish algunos. Journal of Semantics 24(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, C. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T. 1997. Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 335–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, P. 2004. Scopal independence: On branching and wide scope readings of indefinites and disjunctions. An earlier and longer version of the paper published in Journal of Semantics in 2006. Available at http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/schlenker/Indefinites-Long.pdf.

  • Schwarz, B. 2001. Two kinds of long distance indefinites. In Proceedings of the thirteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, eds. R. van Rooij and M. Stokhof, 192–197. Amsterdam: ILLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B. 2004. Indefinites in verb ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 244–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R. 2002. Singleton indefinites. Journal of Semantics 19(3): 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J., and Z.G. Szabo. 2000. On quantifier domain restriction. Mind and Language 15: 219–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Fintel, K. 1994. Restrictions on quantifier domains. Ph.D thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Heusinger, K. 2011. Specificity. In Semantics. An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 2, eds. K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn, and P. Portner, 1025–1058. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Y. 1997. Choice functions and the scopal semantics of indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 399–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics (Germanic Studies), University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

    Cornelia Ebert

  2. Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany

    Stefan Hinterwimmer

Authors
  1. Cornelia Ebert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan Hinterwimmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cornelia Ebert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst. Linguistik/Germanistik, Universitaet Stuttgart, Keplerstr. 17, Stuttgart, 70174, Germany

    Cornelia Ebert

  2. Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrueck, Albrechtstrasse 28, Osnabrueck, 49076, Germany

    Stefan Hinterwimmer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ebert, C., Hinterwimmer, S. (2013). Introduction. In: Ebert, C., Hinterwimmer, S. (eds) Different Kinds of Specificity Across Languages. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 92. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5310-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation