Abstract
At the beginning of the twenty-first century, the philosophy of engineering is becoming its own distinct branch of philosophy. The growing importance of philosophy of engineering cannot be overemphasized, since it has raised or will raise considerable and fundamental issues that challenge traditional ontology, methodology, and epistemology. Engineering is extremely complicated. Without initiating and advocating a new conceptual framework or paradigm, including a number of new categories, neither philosophers nor engineers could comprehend or demonstrate the essential characteristics of engineering. In particular, some social scientists pay significant attention to the relationship between micro (at the level of individuals) and macro (at the level of institutions or the social whole) issues, and as a result, a variety of micro–macro frameworks have advanced. There are four approaches for scientists to investigate social phenomena: micro-theory-based approach, macro-theory-based approach, micro–macro approach, and micro–meso–macro approach. As for engineering phenomena, scholars should focus on engineering facts, engineering acts, and engineering results, which comprise the three layers. A great number of perspectives contribute to a more complete and deeper understanding of engineering practice as a kind of multiple social construction assemblage. Engineering as a tangible architecture of social reality should be explained as a kind of multiple construction undertaken at micro, meso, and macro levels. The traditional micro–macro framework is obsolete. As such, it is time to establish a new kind of micro–meso–macro framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agassi, Joseph. 1975. Institutional individualism. British Journal of Sociology 26(June): 144–155.
Ahrne, Göran. 1990. Agency and organization: Towards an organizational theory of society. London: Sage Publications.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1988a. Action and its environments: Toward a new synthesis. New York: Columbia University Press.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1988b. The new theoretical movement. In Handbook of sociology, ed. Neil J. Smelser. Newbury Park: SAGE Publication, Inc.
Bucciarelli, Louis L. 2003. Engineering philosophy. Delft: DUP Satellite.
Christensen, Steen Hyldgaard, M. Megank, and B. Delahousse (eds.). 2007. Philosophy of engineering. Aarhus: Academica.
Christensen, Steen Hyldgaard, B. Delahousse, and M. Megank (eds.). 2009. Engineering in context. Aarhus: Academica.
Dopfer, Kurt, J. Foster, and J. Potts. 2004. Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary economics 14(2004): 263–279.
Enderle, Georges. 2002. Action-oriented business ethics (Chinese version). Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press.
Gilbert, Margarret. 1989. On social facts. London: Routledge.
Goldman, Steven L. 1990. Philosophy, engineering, and western culture. In Broad and narrow interpretation of philosophy of technology, ed. Paul T. Durbin. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Goldman, Steven L. 1991. The social captivity of engineering. In Critical perspectives on nonacademic science and engineering, ed. Paul T. Durbin. Bethlehem: Lehigh University Press.
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 1988. Economics and institutions: A manifesto for a modern institutional economics. Cambridge: Policy Press.
Jeurissen, Ronald. 1997. Integrating micro, meso and macro levels in business ethics. Ethical Perspectives 4(2): 246.
Li, Bocong. 2002. An introduction to philosophy of engineering. Zhengzhou: Daxiang Press.
Li, Bocong. 2010. On micro, meso, and macro issues in engineering ethics. Ethical Research Bimonthly 4: 25–30.
Li, Bocong, et al. 2010. An introduction to sociology of engineering. Hangzhou: Zhejing University Press.
Martin, Mike W., and Roland Schinzinger. 2005. Ethics in engineering. New York: The mcGrow-Hill Companies, Inc.
Mitcham, Carl. 1994. Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Rutherford, Malcolm. 1994. Institutions in economics: The old and the new institutionalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John R. 1995. The construction of social reality. London: The Penguin Press.
Searle, John R. 2001. Social ontology and the philosophy of society. In On the nature of social and institutional reality, ed. E. Lagerspedz, H. Ikaheimo, and J. Kotkavirta. SoPhi: University of Jyvaskyla.
Tan, Weidong. 2009. Economic ethics: A beyond-modernism perspective. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Tuomela, R. 2003. The We-mode and the I-mode. In Socializing metaphysics: The nature of social reality, ed. F.F. Schmitt. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing, Ing.
Yin, Ruiyu, Yingluo Wang, Bocong Li, et al. 2007. Philosophy of engineering. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, B. (2012). From a Micro–Macro Framework to a Micro–Meso–Macro Framework. In: Christensen, S., Mitcham, C., Li, B., An, Y. (eds) Engineering, Development and Philosophy. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5282-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5282-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5281-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5282-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)