Abstract
The relationship between technology and society may be conceptualized as a seamless web in a form of coevolution. In modern societies, this coevolution, which includes engineering design and related ethical issues, is largely a kind of social experiment. To prevent unnecessary problems, Martin and Schinzinger suggest that engineers should seek to act ethically. This chapter examines how engineering students develop, or not, ethical concerns and practices in their everyday work. It is based on a case study using mixed methods and focusing on students in mentor companies during their Master’s degree program. The educational context is understood as a Mode 2 knowledge production representing a triangular relationship between the student, the university supervisor and the mentor company where power and authority are distributed and shaped over time. Moreover, the student’s role is conceptualized as being a legitimate peripheral participant in engineering practices and consequently in the enactment of practical morality. The students work on problem-oriented projects and deal with complex decision-making processes. Having to face the constraints and limits of real-life project development in an organization, they struggle within a web of technical knowledge, loyalty relationships to various actors, norms, and regulations, as well as market demands. These tensions, and their related trade-offs inherent to quick decision-making, leave little space and time to reflect on ethical questions. Nevertheless, one can trace moral concerns in the students’ processes during their studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barley, S.R., and G. Kunda. 2004. Gurus, hired guns and warm bodies: Itinerant experts in a knowledge economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bijker, W., T.P. Hughes, and T. Pinch (eds.). 1987. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bryman, A., and E. Bell. 2011. Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buser, M., and S. Jensen. 2010. Breaking the wall. In DRUID Society Conference proceedings 2010, London.
Buser, M., C. Koch, and S. Jensen. 2011. I am useless … but not for long: Students as innovators in enterprises. European Group of Organizational Studies conference, Gothenburg.
Contu, A., and H. Willmott. 2003. Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organization Science 14(3): 283–296.
Czarniawska, B., and C. Mazza. 2003. Consulting as liminal space. Human Relations 56(3): 267–290.
Evans, J.A., G. Kunda, and S.R. Barley. 2004. Beach time, bridge time and billable hours: The temporal structure of technical contracting. Administrative Science Quarterly 49: 1–38.
Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzmann, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Koch, C. 2004. The tyranny of projects-teamworking, organisational knowledge and project management in consulting engineering. Economic and Industrial Democracy 25(2): 270–292.
Kunda, G. 1992. Engineering culture. Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Lave, J. 1997. The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives, ed. D. Kirshner and J. Whitson, 17–36. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Lynch, W., and R. Kline. 2000. Engineering practices and engineering ethics. Science, Technology and Human Values 25: 195–225.
Martin, M., and R. Schinzinger. 1989. Ethics in engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Munch, B. 2005. Moral og Videnproduktion. Fragmenter af praktisk moral i den tekniske rådgivning. Lyngby: BYG.DTU.
Musson, D. 2006. The production of Mode 2 knowledge in higher education in South Africa. Ph.D. thesis, University of South Africa, Cape Town.
Nowotny, H., M. Gibbons, and P. Scott. 2001. Re-thinking science – Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Oxford: Polity Press.
Star, S.L. 1991. Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions – On being allergic to onions. In A sociology of monsters – Essays on power, technology and domination, ed. J. Law, 26–56. London: Routledge.
Storberg-Walker, J. 2008. Wenger’s communities of practice revisited: A (failed?) exercise in applied communities of practice theory-building research. Advances in Developing Human Resources 10(4): 555–577.
Tennant, M. 1997. Psychology and adult learning. London: Routledge.
Van de Poel, I. 2001. Investigating ethical issues in engineering design. Science and Engineering Ethics 7(3): 429–446.
Van de Poel, I., and A.C. Van Gorp. 2006. The need for ethical reflection in engineering design. Science, Technology and Human Values 31: 333–360.
Van de Poel, I., and P.P. Verbeek. 2006. Editorial: Ethics and engineering design. Science, Technology and Human Values 31: 223–236.
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. 2002. Communities of practice. Encyclopedia of the social sciences1, Volume 1.5, Article 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buser, M., Koch, C. (2012). Eyes Wide Shut? Loyalty and Practical Morality in Engineering Education. In: Christensen, S., Mitcham, C., Li, B., An, Y. (eds) Engineering, Development and Philosophy. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5282-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5282-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5281-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5282-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)