Skip to main content

The Telic Relationship in Compounds

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory

Part of the book series: Text, Speech and Language Technology ((TLTB,volume 46))

Abstract

French and Turkish telic compounds offer interesting generalizations regarding their lexicalizations, which are accounted for here by the representations allowed by a Generative Lexicon, more specifically by a complex telic role. These representations also account for various syntactic properties associated with these compounds such as anaphoric reference or coercion, and for the concurrence between two forms of expression of the telic in Turkish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We thank our Turkish informants, E. Boton, A. Erturk, C. Hakiemez, I. Yildiz, for their help with the Turkish data. This work has also benefited from comments, and valuable suggestions from people to whom we are grateful: A. Birturk, M. Ciçek and A. Göksel. Many thanks too are due to J. Pustejovsky for his advice on a previous version of this paper. We remain responsible for the interpretation of facts given here and for any mistake.

  2. 2.

    First, internal modification is impossible as shown by (43) and (44):

    (43)

    *şarap güzel bardağ-\( \i \)

     

    (wine nice glass--i)

     

    “*wine nice glass”

    (44)

    güzel şarap bardağ-\( \i \)

     

    (nice wine glass -i)

     

    “nice wine glass”

    and second such constructions receive only one stress (on the head, which is the final word) contrary to syntactic constructions (phrases), in which both words are stressed.

  3. 3.

    Internal modification is possible as indicated by (45) and (46):

    (45)

    recel-lik cilek

     

    jam-lik strawberry

     

    “strawberries for jam”

    (46)

    recel-lik tatl\( \i \) cilek

     

    jam-lik sweet strawberry

     

    “sweet strawberries for jam”

    and the [N1-lik] part of the construction is a relational adjective.

References

  • Anscombre, J. C. (1999). Le jeu de la prédication dans certains composés nominaux. Langue Française, 122, 52–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, A., & Pustejovsky, J. (this volume). A type composition logic for generative lexicon. The metaphysics of words in context.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassac, Ch, & Bouillon, P. (2005, May 19–21). Qualia structure and anaphoric reference in compounds. In Third international workshop on generative approaches to the lexicon (pp.27–35), Geneva Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouillon, P. (1997). Polymorphie et sémantique lexicale: le cas des adjectifs. Lille: Presse du Septentrion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busa, F. (1996). Compositionality and the semantics of nominals, PhD Thesis, Brandeis University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claveau, V., Sébillot, P., Bouillon, P., & Fabre, C. (2001). Acquérir des éléments du lexique génératif: quels résultats et à quels coût? Traitement Automatique des Langues, 42(3), 729–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copestake, A. (2003). Compounds revisited. In Proceedings of the second international workshop on generative approaches to the Lexicon (pp. 20–30), Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabre, C. (1996). Interpretation of nominal compounds: Combining domain –independent and domain –Specific Information. In Coling96, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabre, C., & Sébillot, P. (1994). Interprétation sémantiques des composes nominaux anglais et français sans constituant déverbal. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Compound Nouns (pp.108–124), Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M., & Busa, F. (1999). Qualia structure and the compositional interpretation of compounds. In E. Viegas (Ed.), Breadth and depth of semantic lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapatta, M., & Lascarides, A. (2003). A probabilistic account of logical metonymy. In Computational Linguistics, 29, 261–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J. (1998). The semantics of lexical Underspecification. Folia Linguistia, 32(3–4), 323–347.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Bassac .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bassac, C., Bouillon, P. (2013). The Telic Relationship in Compounds. In: Pustejovsky, J., Bouillon, P., Isahara, H., Kanzaki, K., Lee, C. (eds) Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 46. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5189-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5189-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5188-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5189-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics