Abstract
Brazil is a megadiverse country of continental dimension, with a wide range of distinct biomes and aquatic zones and cultural patterns associated with the use (and misuse) of nature. It is simultaneously the world’s largest producer and consumer of tropical timber, for example, and its beef cattle enterprises occupy over 70 % of all land cleared for production, which accounts for half of all tropical deforestation. With rapid loss of remaining biodiversity, conservation must rely increasingly on strategies to integrate biodiversity use and protection into the rural production landscape. The authors here appraise investment opportunities associated with sustainable use of components of biodiversity. Official data on existing uses of non-timber forest product raw materials are valued by the market at less than $500 million/year though they involve several million forest-dwelling people. Only one cosmetics corporation, Natura, has over $2 billion in annual revenues with growing sales based on a biodiversity-friendly image including community investment and equitable distribution of benefits to recognize traditional knowledge. Such business strategies create value but as yet little of these benefits trickle down. The use of native oilseeds and essences in natural cosmetics, for example, has foundered by over-concentration by producers in one or two oilseeds or essences (e.g. Brazil nut oil, rosewood essential oil) that may also result in species extinctions due to overharvest. Strategies proposed for greater integration of biodiversity within regional development processes include the adoption of a territorial perspective in which clusters of interlinked enterprises can achieve more positive feedback on local employment and income distribution by finding uses for a range of biodiversity components rather than specializing in a narrow band of species, technologies, product or service types. Small-scale natural product enterprises are most viable when upward linked with partners at a larger scale and/or have the potential to innovate in diversified product development. Research and development should stimulate entrepreneurial innovation along with basic enterprise capacity building, legal and technical support and certification of sustainable origin.
Research for this chapter was undertaken under a programme of Brazil’s National Bank for Economic and Social Development-BNDES, as part of a wide-ranging exploration into potential areas for social and environmentally appropriate investment (May and Vinha 2010).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
MP 2186-16/2001 regulates the National Constitution and the CBD, applied to access to components of Brazil’s genetic heritage (translation by the authors).
- 2.
This concept is also based on two connected areas: evolutionary biology considers that if an organism or ecosystem does not depend upon a given characteristic for its survival, it is fated to disappear from the evolutionary process. It is also used to refer to intellectual property rights, such as over geographic designation of origin. If the origin is not formally declared, there is a risk of loss of the right to exclusive use of the product name or quality, and it becomes generic.
- 3.
The study on which this chapter is based (May and Vinha 2010) also includes a review of issues facing bioprospecting and pharmaceutical products, artisanal fisheries and ecotourism enterprises.
- 4.
A survey done in March, 2009, noted that 81% of the population interviewed (with ± 4% error) would prefer buying products derived from processes certified as responsible, even if they cost more than a similar product lacking such a label (Datafolha 2009).
References
Abramovay, R. (2000). O capital social dos territórios: repensando o desenvolvimento rural. Economia Aplicada, 2, 379–397.
Balick, M., Elisabetsky, E., & Laird, S. A. (Eds.). (1996). Medicinal resources of the tropical forest; Biodiversity and its importance to human health. Nova York: Columbia University Press.
Brazil. (2009). Plano Nacional de Promoção de Cadeias da Sociobiodiversidade. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente.
Clement, C. R., Rocha, S. F., Rizzi, C., David, M., & Vivan, J. L. (2007). Conservação on farm. In L. L. Nass (Ed.), Recursos genéticos vegetais (pp. 511–543). Brasilia: Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia.
Conservation International. (2005). Megadiversity. Washington, DC: Conservation International.
Datafolha. (2009). A visão da população brasileira sobre certificação florestal e agropecuária. São Paulo: Folha de São Paulo/Amigos da Terra-Amazônia Brasileira.
Diegues, A. C. (2000). O mito moderno da natureza intocada. São Paulo: Hucitec.
Durojeanni, M., & Pádua, M. T. J. (2001). Biodiversidade: A hora decisiva. Curitiba: Editora UFPR/Fundação O Boticário.
Gonçalves, A. (2008). Sistemas agroflorestais na agricultura familiar noroeste do Mato Grosso; sistematização e análise. Brasília: UNDP/GEF.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243.
Homma, A. (2010). Extrativismo, manejo e conservação dos recursos naturais na Amazônia. In P. May (Ed.), Economia do meio ambiente: Teoria e prática (2nd ed., pp. 353–374). Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier/Campus.
IBGE/SIDRA. Brazilian Foundation for Geography and Statistics, SIDRA database. Municipal extractive production. Yearly.
May, P. H., & Vinha, V. (2010) Perspectivas sobre investimentos sociais no Brasil: Utilização sustentável da biodiversidade. BNDES/CEDEPLAR, Minas Gerais (mimeo).
MDA/SDT. (2003). Referências para um programa territorial de desenvolvimento rural sustentável. Brasília: Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário/Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Territorial, Núcleo de Estudos Agrários e Desenvolvimento Rural (NEAD). Retrieved October 4, 2011, from http://www.nead.gov.br/portal/nead/arquivos/view/publicacoes-nead/publicacoes/arquivo_253.pdf
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: policy responses findings of the responses working group (Millennium ecosystem assessment, Vol. 3). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons; the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peters, C. M., Balick, M. J., Kahn, F., & Anderson, A. B. (1989). Oligarchic forests of economic plants in Amazonia: Utilization and conservation of an important tropical resource. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Storper, M. (1998). Innovation as collective action: Conventions, products, technologies, and territories in the regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford Press.
Sukhdev, P., & Gundimeda, H. (2008, August) The GDP of the poor. Paper presented at the Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Ecological Economics, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sunderlin, W., et al. (2005). Livelihoods, forests, and conservation. World Development, 33, 1383–1402.
Viergever, M. (2010). Arranjos organizacionais da produção agroextrativista. Brasília: Secretaria de Assuntos Estratégicos/UNDP. Retrieved on October 1, 2011, from http://www.sae.gov.br/site/wp-content/uploads/2009-Edital_003-Marcel.zip
Wunder, S. (1999). Value determinants of non-timber forest products in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA-Rio, Textos para Discussão.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
May, P.H., da Vinha, V. (2013). Investing in Sustainable Use of Biodiversity for Social Benefit in Brazil. In: Muradian, R., Rival, L. (eds) Governing the Provision of Ecosystem Services. Studies in Ecological Economics, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5176-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5176-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5175-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5176-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)