Skip to main content

Flood Forecasting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flash Floods

Abstract

Flood forecasting models typically provide estimates of future levels and flows. These outputs can help with providing earlier warnings of the likelihood of flooding than is possible from observations alone, and with interpreting complex situations. The main types include data-driven, conceptual and physically-based rainfall-runoff models and hydrological and hydrodynamic flow routing components. Data assimilation techniques are also widely used, and forecasts are increasingly based on a probabilistic or ensemble approach. This chapter describes the background to these techniques and to some of the considerations in using flood forecasts operationally, such as the decision-making process when interpreting outputs, forecast verification techniques, and the role of forecasting systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson E (1968) Development and testing of snow pack energy balance equations. Water Resour Res 4(1):19–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MG, Bates PD (eds) (2001) Model validation: perspectives in hydrological science. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Andréassian V, Hall A, Chahinian N, Schaake J (Eds.) (2006) Large Sample Basin Experiments for Hydrological Model Parameterization: Results of the Model Parameter Experiment – MOPEX, IAHS Publication 307, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Arduino G, Reggiani P, Todini E (2005) Recent advances in flood forecasting and flood risk assessment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 9(4):280–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholmes JC, Thielen J, Ramos MH, Gentilini S (2009) The European Flood Alert System EFAS – Part 2: statistical skill assessment of probabilistic and deterministic operational forecasts. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:141–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedient PB, Huber WC, Vieux BE (2012) Hydrology and Floodplain Analysis (5th ed.), Pearson

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell VA, Moore RJ, Brown V (2000) Snowmelt forecasting for flood warning in upland Britain. In: Lees M, Walsh P (eds) Flood forecasting: what does current research offer the practitioner? BHS Occasional Paper 12. British Hydrological Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ (2009) Environmental modeling: an uncertain future. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ (2012) Rainfall runoff modelling – the primer, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burnash RJC (1995) The NWS River Forecast System – catchment modeling. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch

    Google Scholar 

  • Casati B, Wilson LJ, Stephenson DB, Nurmi P, Ghelli A, Pocernich M, Damrath U, Ebert EE, Brown BG, Mason S (2008) Forecast verification: current status and future directions. Meteorol Appl 15(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanson H (2004) The hydraulics of open channel flow: an introduction, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Sene KJ, Hearn K (2005) Converting section 105 or SFRM hydrodynamic river models for real time forecasting applications. 40th Defra Flood and Coastal Defence Conference, York, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT (1959) Open channel hydraulics. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke RT (2008) A critique of present procedures used to compare performance of rainfall-runoff models. J Hydrol 352(3–4):379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloke HL, Pappenberger F (2009) Ensemble flood forecasting: a review. J Hydrol 375(3–4):613–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole SJ, Moore RJ (2009) Distributed hydrological modelling using weather radar in gauged and ungauged basins. Adv Water Resour 32(7):1107–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove BA, Clark E (2012) Overview and initial evaluation of the Distributed Hydrologic Model Threshold Frequency (DHM-TF) flash flood forecasting system. NOAA Tech. Report, U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring. http://www.nws.noaa.gov/

  • Cosgrove B, Reed S, Smith M, Ding F, Zhang Y, Cui Z, Zhang Z (2010) Distributed modeling DHM-TF: monitoring and predicting flash floods with a distributed hydrologic model. Eastern Region Flash Flood Conference, Wilkes-Barre, 3 June 2010. http://www.erh.noaa.gov/bgm/research/ERFFW/

  • Cunge JA (1969) On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Muskingum Method). Journal of Hydraulic Research, 7: 205–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson CW, Wilby RL (1999) A comparison of artificial neural networks used for flow forecasting. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 3:529–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day GN (1985) Extended streamflow forecasting using NWSRFS. J Water Resour Plan Manage 111(2):157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demargne J, Mullusky M, Werner K, Adams T, Lindsey S, Schwein N, Marosi W, Welles E (2009) Application of forecast verification science to operational river forecasting in the US National Weather Service. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 89:779–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn SM, Colohan RJE (1999) Developing the snow component of a distributed hydrological model: a stepwise approach based on multi objective analysis. J Hydrol 223(1–2):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Agency (2002) Fluvial flood forecasting for flood warning – real time modelling. Defra/Environment Agency Flood and Coastal Defence R&D Programme. R&D Technical Report W5C-013/5/TR

    Google Scholar 

  • Essery R, Rutter N, Pomeroy J, Baxter R, Stähli M, Gustafsson D, Barr A, Bartlett P, Elder K (2009) SNOWMIP2: an evaluation of forest snow process simulations. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90(8):1120–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Flood Forecasting System EFFS (2003) Final Report WP8. Deliverable 8.3, WL/Delft Hydraulics

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami M, O’Connor KM, Bhattarai KP, Shamseldin AY (2005) Assessing the performance of eight real time updating models and procedures for the Brosna river. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 9(4):394–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hock R (2003) Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas. J Hydrol 282(1–4):104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji Z (2008) Hydrodynamics and water quality: modelling rivers, lakes and estuaries. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe IT, Stephenson DB (2011) Forecast verification. A practitioner’s guide in atmospheric science, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koren V, Schaake J, Mitchell K, Duan Q-Y, Chen F, Baker JM (1999) A parameterization of snowpack and frozen ground intended for NCEP weather and climate models. J Geophys Res 104(D16):19569–19585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koren V, Reed S, Smith M, Zhang Z, Seo D-J (2004) Hydrology Laboratory Research Modeling System (HL-RMS) of the US National Weather Service. J Hydrol 291:297–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koren V, Smith M, Cui Z, Cosgrove B, Werner K, Zamora R (2010) Modification of Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Heat Transfer Component (SAC-HT) for enhanced evapotranspiration. NOAA Tech. Report 53, U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring. http://www.nws.noaa.gov/

  • Krzysztofowicz R (2001) The case for probabilistic forecasting in hydrology. J Hydrol 249:2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laio F, Tamea S (2007) Verification tools for probabilistic forecasts of continuous hydrological variables. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:1267–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Seo DJ, Liu Y, Koren V, McKee P, Corby R (2012) Variational assimilation of streamflow into operational distributed hydrologic models: effect of spatiotemporal adjustment scale. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 9:93–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees M, Young PC, Ferguson S, Beven KJ, Burns J (1994) An adaptive flood warning system for the River Nith at Dumfries. In River Flood Hydraulics (Eds. White WR, Watts J), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Lighthill MJ, Whitham GB (1955) On kinematic waves: I – flood movement in long rivers. Proc R Soc Lond, Series A 229:281–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström G, Johannson B, Persson M, Gardelin M, Bergström S (1997) Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model. J Hydrol 201:272–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen H (2000) Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. J Hydrol 235(3–4):276–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone T (1999) Using URBS for real time flood modelling. Water 99: joint congress; 25th hydrology & water resources symposium, 2nd international conference on water resources & environment research

    Google Scholar 

  • Met Office (2010) Met Office science strategy 2010–2015: unified science and modelling for unified prediction. Met Office, Exeter. www.metoffice.gov.uk

  • Moore RJ (1999) Real-time flood forecasting systems: perspectives and prospects. In: Casale R, Margottini C (eds) Floods and landslides: integrated risk assessment. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore RJ (2007) The PDM rainfall runoff model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11(1):483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell PE, Clarke RT (1981) Adaptive hydrological forecasting – a review. Hydrol Sci Bull 26(2):179–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano TC (2012) The Value of Humans in the Operational River Forecasting Enterprise. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 14: EGU2012-1462-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappenberger F, Scipal K, Buizza R (2008) Hydrological aspects of meteorological verification. Atmos Sci Lett 9(2):43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paquet E, Garcon R (2004) Hydrometeorological forecast at EDF-DTG MORDOR hydrological model. 4th international MOPEX workshop, Paris, July 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Pender G, Néelz S (2011) Flood inundation modelling to support flood risk management. In: Pender G, Faulkner H (eds) Flood risk science and management, 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Price D, Pilling C, Robbins G, Lane A, Boyce G, Fenwick K, Moore RJ, Coles J, Harrison T, Van Dijk M (2012) Representing the spatial variability of rainfall for input to the G2G distributed flood forecasting model: operational experience from the Flood Forecasting Centre. Weather Radar and Hydrology (Eds. Moore RJ, Cole SJ, Illingworth AJ), IAHS Publication 351, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Quick MC (1995) The UBC watershed model. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed DW (1984) A review of British flood forecasting practice. Institute of Hydrology, Report No. 90, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed S, Koren V, Smith M, Zhang Z, Moreda F, Seo D-J, Participants DMIP (2004) Overall Distributed Model Intercomparison Project results. J Hydrol 298(1–4):27–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed S, Schaake J, Zhang Z (2007) A distributed hydrologic model and threshold frequency based method for flash flood forecasting at ungauged locations. J Hydrol 337(3–4):402–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard JC (1997) Validation and intercomparison of different updating procedures for real-time forecasting. Nord Hydrol 28(2):65–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaake JC, Hamill TM, Buizza R, Clark M (2007) HEPEX: the Hydrological Ensemble Prediction Experiment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88:1541–1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sene K (2010) Hydrometeorology: forecasting and applications. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Serban P, Askew AJ (1991) Hydrological forecasting and updating procedures. IAHS Publ. No. 201: 357–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth WJ (2012) Terrestrial hydrometeorology. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP (ed) (1995) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivakumar B, Berndtsson R (2009) Modeling and prediction of complex environmental systems. Editorial and 14 papers. J Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23(7):861–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MB, Koren V, Reed S, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Moreda F, Cui D, Mizukami N, Anderson EA, Cosgrove BA (2012) The Distributed Model Intercomparison Project – phase 2: motivation and design of the Oklahoma experiments. J Hydrol 418–419:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanski HR.,Wilson LJ, Burrows WR (1989) Survey of common verification methods in meteorology. World Weather Watch Technical Report No.8, WMO/TD No.358. World Meteorological Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Thielen J, Bartholmes J, Ramos M-H, de Roo A (2009) The European Flood Alert System – part 1: concept and development. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:125–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todini E (2007) Hydrological catchment modeling: past, present and future. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11(1):468–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vehviläinen B, Huttunen M, Huttunen I (2005) Hydrological forecasting and real time monitoring in Finland: the Watershed Simulation and Forecasting System. ACTIF international conference on innovation advances and implementation of flood forecasting technology, Tromsø, Norway, 17–19 Oct 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerts AH, Seo DJ, Werner M, Schaake J (2012) Operational hydrological ensemble forecasting. In: Beven K, Hall J (eds) Applied uncertainty analysis for flood risk management. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner M, Cranston M, Harrison T, Whitfield D, Schellekens J (2009) Recent developments in operational flood forecasting in England, Wales and Scotland. Meteorol Appl 16(1):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Meteorological Organisation (1992) Simulated real time intercomparison of hydrological models. Operational Hydrology Report No. 38, WMO-No. 779, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • World Meteorological Organisation (2009) Guide to hydrological practices, 6th edn. WMO-No. 168, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • World Meteorological Organisation (2011) Manual on flood forecasting and warning. WMO-No. 1072, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Yatheendradas S, Wagener T, Gupta H, Unkrich C, Goodrich D, Schaffner M, Stewart A (2008) Understanding uncertainty in distributed flash flood forecasting for semiarid regions. Water Resour Res 44:W05S19. doi:10.1029/2007WR005940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Han D (2006) Derivation of unit hydrograph using a transfer function approach. Water Resour Res 42(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young PC, Ratto M (2009) A unified approach to environmental systems modeling. J Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23(7):1037–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young PC, Romanowicz R, Beven K (2012) A data-based mechanistic modelling approach to real-time flood forecasting. In: Beven K, Hall J (eds) Applied uncertainty analysis for flood risk management. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao R-J (1992) The Xin’anjiang model applied in China. J Hydrol 135:371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Sene .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sene, K. (2013). Flood Forecasting. In: Flash Floods. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5164-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics