Skip to main content

Biobanking in Pediatric Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pediatric Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

Modern pediatric disease research requires rapid access to high quality biospecimens. Morphological studies require precise sample preservation while genetic studies often require thousands of samples to identify biologically or clinically relevant findings. To have the necessary number of samples requires specialized centers called biobanks to collect, process, store and distribute biospecimens and associated clinical data. Records of the biospecimen lifecycle must be maintained to ensure that samples are fit-for-purpose and to avoid spurious results that can cost time and money as well as possibly harming patients. Informatics solutions to sample management can vary from basic sample tracking systems to full laboratory information management systems (LIMS). These tracking systems can be ‘organic’ in-house software systems or commercial software packages. While attention to sample collection is imperative for biobanked samples, sample utility is generally proportional to the quality and quantity of associated clinical data. One benefit of centralized biobanking operations is economies of scale allowing development of interfaces between clinical data from a local electronic medical record (EMR) or research patient data warehouse and de-identified biobank samples. This combination allows previously un-contemplated research projects. Regulatory compliance in pediatric biospecimen collections requires consideration of many issues around informed consent, assent, and reconsent at the age of majority. Finally, issues surrounding return of incidental findings are becoming prevalent in the post-genomics era. The components and benefits of various sample management strategies will be discussed with a focus on ensuring sample quality and integration with clinical data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Affymetrix Technical Note, An analysis of blood processing methods to prepare samples for GeneChip expression profiles. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avard D, Sénécal K, Madadi P, Sinnett D. Pediatric research and the return of individual research results. J Law Med Ethics. 2011;39(4):593–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baechler EC, Batliwalla FM, Karypis G, Gaffney PM, Moser K, Ortmann WA, Espe KJ, Balasubramanian S, Hughes KM, Chan JP, et al. Expression levels for many genes in human peripheral blood cells are highly sensitive to ex vivo incubation. Genes Immun. 2004;5(5):347–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes MG, Grom AA, Griffin TA, Colbert RA, Thompson SD. Gene expression profiles from peripheral blood mononuclear cells are sensitive to short processing delays. Biopreserv Biobank. 2010;8(3):153–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernini P, Bertini I, Luchinat C, Nincheri P, Staderini S, Turano P. Standard operating procedures for pre-analytical handling of blood and urine for metabolomic studies and biobanks. J Biomol NMR. 2011;49(3–4):231–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Betsou F, Lehmann S, Ashton G, Barnes M, Benson EE, Coppola D, DeSouza Y, Eliason J, Glazer B, Guadagni F, et al. Standard preanalytical coding for biospecimens: defining the sample PREanalytical code. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(4):1004–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Black L, McClellan KA. Familial communication of research results: a need to know? J Law Med Ethics. 2011;39(4):605–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bookman EB, Langehorne AA, Eckfeldt JH, Glass KC, Jarvik GP, Klag M, Koski G, Motulsky A, Wilfond B, Manolio TA, et al. Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140A:1033–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brisson AR, Matsui D, Rieder MJ, Fraser DD. Translational research in pediatrics: tissue sampling and biobanking. Pediatrics. 2012;129(1):153–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaigneau C, Cabioch T, Beaumont K, Betsou F. Serum biobank certification and the establishment of quality controls for biological fluids: examples of serum biomarker stability after temperature variation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(10):1390–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton EW. Informed consent and biobanks. J Law Med Ethics. 2005;33:15–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton EW, Smith M, Fullerton SM, Burke W, McCarty CA, Koenig BA, McGuire AL, Beskow LM, Dressler L, Lemke AA, et al. Confronting real time ethical, legal, and social issues in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Consortium. Genet Med. 2010;12(10):616–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Common Minimum Technical Standards and Protocols for Biological Resource Centres Dedicated to Cancer Research. http://www.iarc.fr/en/publications/pdfs-online/wrk/wrk2/Standards_ProtocolsBRC.pdf

  • Elliott P, Peakman TC. The UK Biobank sample handling and storage protocol for the collection, processing and archiving of human blood and urine. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(2):234–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez CV, Kodish ED, Weijer C. Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative. IRB. 2003;25(3):12–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez CV, Taweel S, Kodish ED, Weijer C. Disclosure of research results to research participants: a pilot study of the needs and attitudes of adolescents and parents. Paediatr Child Health. 2005;10(6):332–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grodin M, Glantz L. Children as research subjects: science, ethics, and law. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley JB. IL-7Ralpha and multiple sclerosis risk. Nat Genet. 2007;39(9):1053–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER). 2008 best practices for repositories; collection, storage, retrieval and distribution of biological materials for research. Cell Preserv Technol. 2008;6(1):3–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisand K, Kerna I, Kumm J, Jonsson H, Tamm A. Impact of cryopreservation on serum concentration of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-7, TIMP-1, vascular growth factors (VEGF) and VEGF-R2 in biobank samples. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49(2):229–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kodish E. Ethics and research with children: a case-based approach. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohane IS, Mandl KD, Taylor PL, Holm IA, Nigrin DJ, Kunkel LM. Reestablishing the researcher-patient compact. Science. 2007;316:836–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller FA, Christensen R, Giacomini M, Robert JS. Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants. J Med Ethics. 2008;34:210–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Research involving human biological materials: ethical issues and policy guidance. Volume. 1. Report and recommendation of the National Bioethics Commission, 1999. Available from: http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/hbm.pdf. Accessed 9 Sept 2012.

  • National Cancer Institute. National Cancer Institute best practices for biospecimen resources. 2011 revision. Available from: http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/practices/2011bp.asp. Accessed 9 Sept 2012.

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD best practice guidelines for Biological Resource Centres. 2007. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/sti/biotechnologypolicies/38777417.pdf. Accessed 9 Sept 2012.

  • Persson C, Jia Y, Pettersson H, Dillner J, Nyren O, Ye W. H. pylori seropositivity before age 40 and subsequent risk of stomach cancer: a glimpse of the true relationship? PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e17404.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petty RE, Southwood TR, Baum J, Bhettay E, Glass DN, Manners P, Maldonado-Cocco J, Suarez-AlmazorM, Orozco-Alcala J, Prieur AM. Revision of the proposed classification criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Durban, 1997. J Rheumatol. 1998;25(10):1991–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Research involving human biological materials: ethical issues and policy guidance, vol. 1. Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Commission. 1999. http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/hbm.pdf

  • Rezeli M, Vegvari A, Marko-Varga G, Laurell T. Isotope labeled internal standards (ILIS) as a basis for quality control in clinical studies using plasma samples. J Proteomics. 2010;73(6):1219–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schrohl AS, Wurtz S, Kohn E, Banks RE, Nielsen HJ, Sweep FC, Brunner N. Banking of biological fluids for studies of disease-associated protein biomarkers. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008;7(10):2061–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shalowitz DI, Miller FG. Disclosing individual results of clinical research. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;294(6):737–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp RR. Downsizing genomic medicine: approaching the ethical complexity of whole-genome sequencing by starting small. Genet Med. 2011;13(3):191–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skogstrand K, Ekelund CK, Thorsen P, Vogel I, Jacobsson B, Norgaard-Pedersen B, Hougaard DM. Effects of blood sample handling procedures on measurable inflammatory markers in plasma, serum and dried blood spot samples. J Immunol Methods. 2008;336(1):78–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stack CB, Gharani N, Gordon ES, Schmidlen T, Christman MF, Keller MA. Genetic risk estimation in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative. Genet Med. 2011;13(2):131–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teunissen CE, Petzold A, Bennett JL, Berven FS, Brundin L, Comabella M, Franciotta D, Frederiksen JL, Fleming JO, Furlan R, et al. A consensus protocol for the standardization of cerebrospinal fluid collection and biobanking. Neurology. 2009;73(22):1914–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson SD, Barnes MG, Griffin TA, Grom AA, Glass DN. Heterogeneity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: impact of molecular profiling based on DNA polymorphism and gene expression patterns. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2611–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf SM, Lawrentz FP, Nelson CA, Kahn JP, Cho MK, Clayton EW, Fletcher JG, Georgieff MK, Hammerschmidt D, Hudson K, et al. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36(2):219–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer. Common Minimum Technical Standards and Protocols for Biological Resource Centres Dedicated to Cancer Research. 2007. Available from: http://www.iarc.fr/en/publications/pdfs-online/wrk/wrk2/StandardsProtocolsBRC.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication was supported in part by an Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award, NIH/NCATS Grant Number 8UL1TR07-04. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael G. Barnes Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barnes, M.G., Lynch, J.A., Corsmo, J.J., Witte, D.P., Steele, P.E. (2012). Biobanking in Pediatric Research. In: Hutton, J. (eds) Pediatric Biomedical Informatics. Translational Bioinformatics, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5149-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics