Abstract
Current methods of evaluating the performance of Energy Storing and Returning (ESR) prosthesis are subjective and rely on VO2 consumption. Current prosthetic feet are designed for specific applications and the majority are designed for walking and moderate running. These mechanical feet have fixed mechanical and dynamic characteristics. They have to be selected to meet the requirement of the task and any use outside the domain of the task can result in extreme/severe lack of gait symmetry and loss of energy. Poor gait symmetry results is excess consumption of energy, back pain or fatigue. To investigate if a multipurpose foot can be designed to passively adapt to the walking or running condition one must first understand the different dynamics that are involved and are required from the task specific foot. Static tests have shown these feet to have non-linear stiffness, making the prediction of their dynamic response difficult. The most reliable method to test for dynamic characteristics is drop and modal testing. A method approach has been developed as part of this research to test and compare the dynamic characteristics of three different types of foot (natural frequency, mode shapes and damping). This is needed to explore the differences in the responses of these feet that allow one to be used for walking, one to be used for running and one to be used for sprinting with ease.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blickhan, R.: The spring mass model for running and hopping. J. Biomech. 22(11–12), 1217–1227 (1989)
Buckley, J.: Sprint kinematics of athletes with lower limb amputations. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 80, 501–508 (1999)
Fey, N.P., Klute, G.K., Neptune, R.R.: The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees, Clin. Biomech. 26, 1025–1032 (2011)
Gailey, R.: Optimizing prosthetic running performance of the transtibial amputee. Proceedings of the AOPA annual meeting (2003)
Hafner, B., Sanders, J., Czerniecki, J., Fergason, J.: Trans-tibial energy-storage-and-return prosthetic devices: a review of energy concepts and a proposed nomenclature. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 39(1), 1–11 (2002)
Lechler, K.: Lower-limb prosthetics—design improvements of a prosthetic spring foot. Am. Acad. Orthotists and Prosthetists—J. Proc. (2005)
Lehmann, J.F., Price, R., Boswell-Bessette, S., Dralle, A., Questad, K., deLateur, B.: Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: flex foot and seattle foot versus standard SACH foot. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 74(11), 1225–12331 (1993b)
Lehmann, J.F., Price, R., Boswell-Bessette, S., Dralle, A., Questad, K.: Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: seattle ankle/lite foot versus SACH foot. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 74(8), 853–861 (1993)
Lewis, J., Buckley, J., Zahedi, S.: An insight into paralympic amputee sprinting. Br. J. Therapy Rehabil. 3(8), 440–444 (1996)
Macfarlane, P., Nielsen, D., Shurr, D., Meier, K.: Gait comparisons for below-knee amputees using a flex-foot versus a conventional prosthetic foot. J. Prosthetics and Orthotics 3, 150–161 (1991)
Noroozi, S., Sewell, P., Vinney, J., Dyer, B. T.J., Rahman, A. G. A., Zhi Chao, O.: Modal analysis of composite prosthetic energy-storing-and-returning feet: an initial investigation, Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers part P: J. Sports Eng. Technol. (2012, in press)
Omasta, M., Palousek, D., Návrat, T., Rosicky, J.: Finite element analysis for the evaluation of the structural behaviour, of a prosthesis for trans-tibial amputees. Medical engineering and physics (2011, in press)
Pailler, D., Sautreuil, P., Piera, J.B., Genty, M., Goujon, H.: Evolution in prostheses for sprinters with lower-limb amputation [Evolution des protheses des sprinters amputes de membre inferieur], Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique 47(6), 374–81 (2004)
Racic, V., Pavic, A., Brownjohn, J.M.W.: Experimental identification and analytical modelling of human walking forces: literature review. J. Sound Vibr. 326, 1–49 (2009)
Versluys, R., Beyl, P., Van Damme, M., Desomer, A., Van Ham, R., Lefeber, D.: Prosthetic feet: state-of-the-art review and the importance of mimicking human ankle-foot biomechanics. Disability Rehabil.: Assistive Technol. 4(2), 65–75 (2009)
Zadpoor, A.A., Nikooyan, A.A., Arshi, A.R.: A model-based parametric study of impact force during running. J. Biomech. 40, 2012–2021 (2007)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Chas A Blatchford and Sons Ltd and Endolite for their kind donation of the Elite Blades used for this investigation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Noroozi, S., Rahman, A.G.A., Dupac, M., Vinney, J.E. (2012). Dynamic Characteristics of Prosthetic Feet: A Comparison Between Modal Parameters of Walking, Running and Sprinting Foot. In: Beran, J., BÃlek, M., Hejnova, M., Zabka, P. (eds) Advances in Mechanisms Design. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5125-5_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5125-5_44
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5124-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5125-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)