Skip to main content

Making a Difference: Using Laptops as a Support for Spelling Improvement Among Students with Learning Disability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Literacy Studies ((LITS,volume 7))

Abstract

The study examined the effect of using laptops on the spelling capabilities of students with learning disabilities (LD). The participants were 104 Hebrew-speaking students with LD aged 13–16, who study in special education classes, and were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group, which used laptops, and the control group, which did not use laptops. A usability questionnaire was administered before the 4-month intervention to ensure that there were no noticeable gaps in the level of computer literacy among the students who used the laptops. A spelling test was administered at a pretest and posttest.

The findings indicated that the participants in the experimental group significantly improved their spelling capabilities as opposed to the control group. It seems that the use of laptops in special education classes can enhance the spelling capabilities of students with LD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, A. M., & Gathercole, S. E. (2000). Limitations in working memory: Implications for language development. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 95–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, F. (1999). Taking the classroom home. Appalachia, 32(1), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., Lipson, A., & Lerman, S. (2006). Wireless laptops as means for promoting active learning in large lecture halls. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebell, D., & Kay, R. E. (2009). Summary of research findings from the berkshire 1:1 laptop program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national educational computing conference. Available at: http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Research/NECC_Research_Paper_Archives/NECC2009/Bebell_NECC09.pdf

  • Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire wireless learning initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(2), 5–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebell, D., Russell, M., & O’Dwyer, L. M. (2004). Measuring teachers’ technology uses: Why multiple measures are more revealing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. E. (2004). Using response times to model student disengagement. In Proceedings of the workshop on social and emotional intelligence in learning environments, 7th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Maceio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P. D., & Bryant, B. R. (1998). Using assistive technology adaptations to include students with learning disabilities in cooperative learning activities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(1), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulgren, J. A., & Carta, J. J. (1993). Examining the instructional contexts of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59(3), 182–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromwell, S. (1999). Laptops change curriculum—and students. Education World. Retrieved March 27, 2009. Available at: http://www.education-world.com/a_curr/curr178.shtml

  • Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Share, D. L. (2002). Orthographic learning during reading: Examining the role of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell, A. G., Newton, D. A., & Petroff, J. G. (2008). Assistive technology in the classroom: Enhancing the school experience of students with disabilities. Columbus: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demb, A., Erickson, D., & Hawkins-Wilding, S. (2004). The laptop alternative: Student’s reactions and strategic implications. Computers in Education, 43, 383–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, L., Hartley, K., & Strudler, N. (2007). Teacher concerns during initial implementation of a one-to-one laptop initiative at the middle school level. Journal of Res Technol Education, 39(3), 263–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, M. (2002). Exploring student perceptions of group interactions and class satisfaction in the web enhanced classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, M., Dexter, S., & Heinecke, W. F. (2007). What added value does a1:1 student to laptop ratio bring to technology-supported teaching and learning? Journal of Computer Assist Learning, 13, 440–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, M., & Heinecke, W. (2008). The impact of 1:1 laptop use on middle school math and science standardized test scores. Computers in the Schools, 24(3–4), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairman, J. (2004). Trading roles: teachers and students learn with technology. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the New England Educational Research Organization, Portsmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G., Stefanone, M., Grace-Martin, M., & Hembrooke, H. (2001). The effects of wireless computing in collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Interactions, 13, 257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student learning: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1), 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulek, J. C., & Demirtas, H. (2005). Learning with technology: The impact of laptop use on student achievement. The journal of technology, learning and assessment, 3(2), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hezroni, O. E., & Shrieber, B. (2004). Word processing as a compensation mechanism for students with writing disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Barron, A. E., & Kemker, K. (2008). Examining the digital divide in K-12 public schools: Four-year trends for supporting ICT literacy in Florida. Computers in Education, 51(4), 1648–1663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, A. A., Mulhernm, G., & Wylie, J. (2009). Literacy skills of students with reading difficulties proofreading using an assistive software homophone tool: Compensatory and remedial effects. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 322–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, J., Conway, P., & Zhao, Y. (2008). The digital pencil: One-to-one computing for children. London/New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I., & Ravid, D. (2001). Morphology and spelling among Hebrew-speaking children: From kindergarten to first grade. Journal of Child Language, 28, 741–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. B. (1998). Assistive technology and learning disabilities: Today’s realities and tomorrow’s promises. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipka, O., Lesaux, N. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). Retrospective analyses of the reading development of a group of grade 4 disabled readers: Risk status and profiles over 5 years. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 364–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, P. (2007). The one-to-one Tsunami. Retrieved March 27, 2009, from URL: http://www.techlearning.com/showArticle.php?articleID=196604373

  • MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., Haynes, J. B., & DeLaPaz, S. (1996). Spelling checkers and ­students with learning disabilities: Performance comparisons and impact on spelling. Journal of Special Education, 30, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maine Education Policy Research Institute (MEPRI). (2003). The Maine learning technology ­initiative: teacher, student, and school perspectives mid-year evaluation report. Retrieved March 27, 2009. Available at: http://www.usm.maine.edu/cepare/pdf/ts/mlti.pdf

  • Mioduser, D., & Nachmias, R. (2008). Sites 2006 findings from Israeli study-study report. Retrieved March 25, 2009. http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/Rama/MivchanimBenLeumiyim/OdotSites.htm

  • Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Tubin, D. (2004). Sustainability, scalability and transferability of pedagogical innovation in five Israeli schools. Journal of Education Communication & Information, 4(1), 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. C. (2009). Teaching spelling to students with language and learning disabilities. In G. A. Troia (Ed.), Instruction and assessment for struggling writers: Evidence-based practices (pp. 269–289). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outhred, L. (1989). Word processing: Its impact on children’s writing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(4), 262–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, F. (2001). Outstanding questions about phonological processing in dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7, 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: Phonological and morphological factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 459–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Integrating educational technology into teaching (3rd ed.). Upper saddle River: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, M., Bebell, D., & Higgins, J. (2004). Laptop learning: A comparison of teaching and learning in upper elementary equipped with shared carts of laptops and permanent 1:1 Laptops. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(3), 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (2009). Adolescents with learning disabilities as writers: Are we selling them short? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 24(2), 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seok, S., DaCosta, B., Kinsell, C., Poggio, J. C., & Meyen, E. L. (2010). Computer-mediated intersensory learning model for students with learning disabilities. TechTrends, 54(2), 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L. S. (1998). Phonological processing deficits and reading disabilities. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 141–160). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spektor-Levy, O., Menashe, K., Doron, E., & Raviv, D. (2010). Learning with personal laptops in school: Benefits & gains, obstacles & constraints – Following a longitudinal study. In Y. Eshet-Alkalai, A. Caspi, S. Eden, N. Geri, & Y. Yair (Eds.), Proceedings of the Chais conference on Instructional Technologies Research 2010: Learning in the Technological Era (pp. 81–86). Raanana: The Open University of Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., & Bourassa, D. (2000). The development of spelling skill. Topics in Language Disorder, 20(3), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trimmel, M., & Bachmann, J. (2004). Cognitive, social, motivational and health aspects of students in laptop classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedora, J., & Stromer, R. (2007). Computer-based spelling instruction for students with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, A., & McGee, R. (2005). A study of one-to-one computer use in mathematics and science instruction at the secondary level in Henrico county public schools (SRI International. SRI Project P12269).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sigal Eden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eden, S., Shamir, A., Fershtman, M. (2012). Making a Difference: Using Laptops as a Support for Spelling Improvement Among Students with Learning Disability. In: Shamir, A., Korat, O. (eds) Technology as a Support for Literacy Achievements for Children at Risk. Literacy Studies, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5119-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics