Skip to main content

Invited Spaces and Informal Practices in Participatory Community Forest Management in India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Forest and Nature Governance

Part of the book series: World Forests ((WFSE,volume 14))

Abstract

This chapter shows how the formal participation of men and women in a community-based forest management project shapes and is shaped by informal practices. The gender analysis is based on an ethnographic case study of a village in Andhra Pradesh, India. It aims to contribute to a better understanding of the gendered practices of participation in a highly stratified community structure. The chapter explores how women’s participation is influenced by the prevalent notions and self-images of femininities and masculinities and by their everyday roles in informal practices. It observes that actors adapt the functioning of formal spaces of participation to suit their local situations. The chapter demonstrates that focusing on formal spaces is insuficient to understand gendered participation. Instead, the findings show that despite being marginalised in their formal roles, the women used the project intervention to increase their bargaining power, and to gain visibility and status in the community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Mainstreaming a gender perspective is the process of assessing the implications for women and men of any planned action, including legislation, policies or programmes, in all areas and at all levels. It is a strategy for making women's as well as men's concerns and experiences an integral dimension of the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of policies and programmes in all political, economic and societal spheres so that women and men benefit equally and inequality is not perpetuated. The ultimate goal is to achieve gender equality.’ (UN Economic and Social Council 1997, p.28).

  2. 2.

    Administratively, India is divided into states, each of which is further divided into districts and blocks, with the village councils at the lowest rung of the state administrative units.

  3. 3.

    APCFM intervention is the second phase of what is popularly known as the Andhra Pradesh Joint Forest Management (APJFM) intervention (1994–2000), which was implemented by the AP state government with sponsorship from the World Bank. APCFM was introduced in Andhra Pradesh as a spin-off from the APJFM, with additional emphasis on the participation of community actors in general and women in particular, to foster gender- equal participation along with community development and forest conservation.

  4. 4.

    The local language in Andhra Pradesh is Telugu. For practical reasons, this was the language the author used to collect and process most of the qualitative ethnographic data.

  5. 5.

    Invited spaces’ refer in this context to the formal spaces created by the interventionists (the Andhra Pradesh state and the World Bank) earmarked for participation of community members, including women.

  6. 6.

    There are several castes recognised by the Indian constitution. This recognition serves as the basis for providing positive discrimination (in provision of social services like health, education and employment opportunities) for the socially backward castes such as the ST (Scheduled Tribes), the SC (Scheduled Castes) and the BC (Backward Castes). The FC (Forward Castes) caste groups are treated in India as socially forward caste groups, and hence are not covered by the positive discrimination policy.

  7. 7.

    Pseudonyms are used in this chapter for protection of the confidentiality of respondents, including the local community actors, the forest department officials and the facilitating NGO personnel.

References

  • Agarwal B (1997) Environmental action, gender equity and women’s participation. Dev Change 28:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal B (2001) Participatory exclusions, community forestry and gender: an analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Dev 29(10):1623–1648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal B (2009) Gender and forest conservation: the impact of women’s participation in community forest governance. Ecol Econ 68(11):2785–2799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A, Gibson CC (eds) (2001) Communities and the environment: ethnicity, gender, and the state in community-based conservation. Rutgers University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Andhra Pradesh Forest Department (2002) Andhra Pradesh community forestry management: project implementation plan (PIP). APFD, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora D (1994) From state regulation to people’s participation: case of Joint Forest Management in India. Economic and Political Weekly, pp 619–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchy M, Subba S (2003) Why is community forestry a social- and gender-blind technology? The case of Nepal. Gend Technol Dev 7(3):313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall A (2003) Whose voices? Whose choices? Reflections on gender and participatory development. World Dev 31(8):1325–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall A (2004) Spaces for transformation? Reflecting on issues of power and difference in participation in development. In: Hickey S, Mohan G (eds) Participation: from tyranny to transformation. Zed, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire P (1995) The pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum, New York (Original work published in 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guijt I, Shah MK (eds) (1998) The myth of community: gender issues in participatory development. Intermediate Technology Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer N (2005) Is microfinance a “magic bullet” for women’s empowerment? Analysis of findings from South Asia. Econ Polit Wkly 29:4709–4718

    Google Scholar 

  • Lama A, Buchy M (2002) Gender, class, caste and participation: the case of community forestry in Nepal. Indian J Gend Stud 9(1):28–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (1991) The production of space. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinzen-Dick RS, Zwarteveen M (2001) Gender dimensions of community resource management: the case of water user’s associations in South Asia. In: Agrawal A, Gibson C (eds) Communities and the environment: ethnicity, gender and the state in community based conservation, Rutgers University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser C, Moser A (2005) Gender mainstreaming since Beijing: a review of success and limitations in international institutions. Gend Dev 13(2):11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandigama S (2009) Transformations in the making: actor-networks, elite-control and gender dynamics in community forest management intervention in Adavipalli, Andhra Pradesh, India. Doctoral Thesis. Shaker Publishing B.V, Maastricht

    Google Scholar 

  • Resurreccion BP, Elmhirst R (eds) (2008) Gender and natural resource management: livelihoods, mobility and interventions. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie J, Lewis J (eds) (2003) Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage Publications, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarin M (1998) Community forest management: whose participation…? In: Guijt I, Kaul Shah M (eds) The myth of community: gender issues in participatory development. Intermediate Technology, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarin M (2001) Empowerment and disempowerment of forest women in Uttarakhand, India. Gend Technol Dev 5(3):341–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1997) Report of the Economic and Social Council for 1997, A/52/3

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby S (2005) Gender mainstreaming: productive tensions in theory and practice. Soc Polit Int Stud Gend State Soc 12(3):321–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

Government Orders

  • GO Ms. No. 13. (2004). AP community forest management project: comprehensive orders. Government of Andhra Pradesh

    Google Scholar 

  • GOAP (1993c) Dated 11.11.1993 Providing guidelines for formation of VSS. G.O. Issued by the Environment, Forest, Science & Technology Department. No. 224

    Google Scholar 

  • GOAP (1996) Dated 07.12.1996 Providing comprehensive orders on JFM. G.O. Issued by the Environment, Forest, Science & Technology Department, No. 173

    Google Scholar 

  • GOAP (2000) The Andhra Pradesh Vana Samrakshana Samiti and joint forest management rules. Draft Rules

    Google Scholar 

  • GOI (1990) Government of India resolution on joint forest management. Ministry of Environment and Forests. New Delhi, Government of India

    Google Scholar 

  • GOI (2000) Strengthening of joint forest management. Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi, Government of India

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sailaja Nandigama .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nandigama, S. (2012). Invited Spaces and Informal Practices in Participatory Community Forest Management in India . In: Arts, B., Behagel, J., van Bommel, S., de Koning, J., Turnhout, E. (eds) Forest and Nature Governance. World Forests, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5113-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics