Advertisement

Ranciere and Leadership for Reforms to School-to-Work Transition: The Presupposition of Equality of Theoretical Assets from Diverse Educational Cultures

  • Michael SinghEmail author
  • Roberta (Bobby) Harreveld
  • Xiafang Chen
Chapter
Part of the Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (TVET, volume 17)

Abstract

A key challenge in the twenty-first century is how to prepare educational researchers for much needed intellectual dialogues between the ‘East’ and ‘West’, as much as ‘North’ and ‘South’, problematic constructions though these are. The research reported in this chapter focuses on how the Western Anglophone system of higher degree research training can build on non-Western students’ diverse intellectual heritage and linguistic assets in their transition from education to work. Here, the internationalisation of Western Anglophone education is defined as extending and deepening the capabilities of students—local, international, immigrant and refugee—to create theoretical tools from non-Western languages and to use them in their research into education and training in the West. Given the dynamics and stakes in the transition from education to work, the research reported in this chapter is part of an exploration of the ways in which non-Western students’ bi- and multilingual capabilities might be used to enhance their career trajectories in the world’s multilingual knowledge societies. The particular project reported upon in this chapter focuses on research into students from diverse educational cultures engaging non-Western metaphors, images and concepts to theorise the leadership of Western reforms to school-to-work transition. This research is contributing to an understanding of how research education may take this key dimension of cultural diversity as a vehicle for producing ‘worldly theoretic-linguistic connectivities’ made possible by the presence of research students from diverse educational cultures in Western Anglophone universities. To do so, the first section of this chapter uses Weber’s (In: Gerth H, Mills C (trans & ed) From Max Weber: essays in sociology. Routledge, London, 1991) ideal types of bureaucratic and charismatic leadership to contrast Fullan’s (Leadership & sustainability. Crown Press, San Francisco, 2005) bureaucratic leadership with Lear’s (Radical hope: ethics in the face of cultural devastation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2006) charismatic indigenous leadership and concludes with an account of Ranciere’s (The ignorant schoolmaster. Stanford University Press, Palto Alto, 1991) charismatic educational leader.

Keywords

Theoretical Tool Charismatic Leadership Intellectual Asset Radical Hope Plenty Coup 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This chapter is based on research funded by the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Project (DP0988108).

References

  1. Alatas, S. (2006). Alternative discourses in Asian social science: Responses to eurocentrism. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Blau, S. (2003). Performative literacy. Voices from the Middle, 10(3), 18–22.Google Scholar
  3. Bonnett, A. (2004). The idea of the west: Culture, politics and history. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, K. (2010). Asia as method: Toward deimperialization. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, X. (2011). Leadership for the reform of senior secondary schooling: A case study of Queensland’s vocational education and training in schools. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar
  7. Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  8. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. South Yarra: MacMillan Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Emerson, R., Fretz, R., & Shaw, L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (2010). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a vengeance. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  12. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership & sustainability. San Francisco: Crown Press.Google Scholar
  13. Harreveld, B., & Singh, M. (2008). Amartya Sen’s capability approach and the brokering of learning provision for young adults. Vocations and Learning: Studies in Vocational and Professional Education, 1(3), 211–226.Google Scholar
  14. Harreveld, R., & Singh, M. (2009). Contextualising learning at the education-training-work interface. Education and Training, 51(2), 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lear, J. (2006). Radical hope: Ethics in the face of cultural devastation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ranciere, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster. Palto Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Singh, M. (2009). Using Chinese knowledge in internationalising research education: Jacques Rancière, an ignorant supervisor and doctoral students from China. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 7(2), 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Singh, M. (2010). Ignorance, Bradley’s international students and Bourdieu: Connecting intellectual projects between China and Australia. Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 31–45.Google Scholar
  19. Singh, M. (2011a). Australians and Australia’s national interests in the Asian Century: Deepening and extending linguistic and theoretical engagements with Asia through education for people-to-people links. (A keynote address to the 3rd Engaging with Vietnam: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue Conference, 4th – 5th December, Vietnam National University, Hanoi).Google Scholar
  20. Singh, M. (2011b). Learning from China to internationalise Australian research education: Pedagogies of intellectual equality and ‘optimal ignorance’ of ERA journal rankings. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(4), 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Singh, M. (2011c). Multicultural international mindedness: Pedagogies of intellectual e/quality for Australian engagement with Indian (and Chinese) theorising. A paper presented at the conference “Multiculturalism: Perspectives from Australia, Canada and China,” 21–22 November, University of Sydney. http://sydney.edu.au/education_social_work/professional_learning/resources/papers/MulticulturalismConference_Sydney2011_Proceedings.pdf
  22. Singh, M., & Cui, G. (2011). Internationalising western doctoral education through bilingual research literacy. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 19(2), 535–545.Google Scholar
  23. Singh, M., & Han, J. (2009). Engaging Chinese ideas through Australian educational research: Using chéngyǔ to connect intellectual projects in peripheral nations. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(1), 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Singh, M., & Han, J. (2010a). Teacher education for world English speaking student-teachers: Making transnational knowledge connections for mutual learning. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1300–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Singh, M., & Han, J. (2010b). Peer review, Bourdieu and honour: Connecting Chinese and Australian intellectual projects. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(2), 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Singh, M., & Meng, H. (2011). Democratising western research using non-western theories: Rancière and mute Chinese theoretical tools. Studies in Higher Education. 1–14, iFirst Article.Google Scholar
  27. Turner, C. (2010). Investigating sociological theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Weber, M. (1991). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (H. Gerth & C. Mills, Trans. & Ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Singh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Roberta (Bobby) Harreveld
    • 2
  • Xiafang Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Educational ResearchUniversity of Western SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Learning & Teaching Education Research Centre (LTERC)Central Queensland UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations