Leveraging Diversity to Promote Successful Transition from Education to Work

  • Guy TchibozoEmail author
Part of the Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (TVET, volume 17)


This chapter proposes a general approach of the ways for school-to-work transition systems to take advantage of the diversity of the public for addressing organisations’ needs and promoting successful transition from education to work. School-to-work transition is defined in terms of process, system and subsystems – that is, the family, education, guidance and employment subsystems. Using the Thomas (World class diversity management – a strategic approach. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, 2010) ‘world class diversity management’ framework, demand for diversity is approached through the lens of representativeness, relationships and empowerment. Based on a review of the research and practice literature in the field of multicultural education and management, it is suggested that the education and employment subsystems are particularly well-placed for action. Ongoing programmes could be improved and new initiatives taken in the areas of equal educational opportunities, multicultural and intercultural education, higher education access and employment placement in the specific sector of diversity recruitment.


Transition System Stakeholder Theory Diversity Management Deliberative Democracy Multicultural Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aboud, F. E. (2009). Modifying children’s racial attitudes. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), The Routledge international companion to multicultural education (pp. 199–209). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Allemann-Ghionda, C. (2009). From intercultural education to the inclusion of diversity – theories and policies in Europe. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), The Routledge international companion to multicultural education (pp. 134–145). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, R., & Billings-Harris, L. (2010). Trailblazers – How top business leaders are accelerating results through inclusion and diversity. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Audretsch, D., Dohse, D., & Niebuhr, A. (2010). Cultural diversity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis for Germany. The Annals of Regional Science, 45(1), 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banks, J. A. (2009a). Multicultural education – Dimensions and paradigms. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), The Routledge international companion to multicultural education (pp. 9–32). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Banks, J. A. (2009b). Diversity, group identity, and citizenship education in a global age. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), The Routledge international companion to multicultural education (pp. 303–322). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Barrow, L., & Rouse, C. (2005). Causality, causality, causality: The view of education inputs and outputs from economics (Working paper of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, WP 2005–15, pp. 1–38). Chicago: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Brewer, M. B. (2010). Social identity complexity and acceptance of diversity. In R. J. Crisp (Ed.), The psychology of social and cultural diversity (pp. 11–33). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Castles, S. (2009). World population movements, diversity and education. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), The Routledge international companion to multicultural education (pp. 49–61). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  11. Fishkin, J. (2009). When the people speak – Deliberative democracy & public consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contribution to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge (UK): Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Harvey, M. G., Novicevic, M. M., & Speier, C. (2000). Strategic global human resource management: The role of inpatriate managers. Human Resource Management Review, 10(2), 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences – Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Krislov, M. (2010). Higher education and the challenge of inclusion. In D. Little & S. P. Mohanty (Eds.), The future of diversity – Academic leaders reflect on American higher education (pp. 159–171). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Magnusson, P., Baack, D. W., Zdravkovic, S., Staub, K. M., & Amine, L. S. (2008). Meta-analysis of cultural differences: Another slice at the apple. International Business Review, 17, 520–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maule, A. J., & Svenson, O. (1993). Theoretical and empirical approaches to behavioural decision making and their relation to time constraints. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making (pp. 3–25). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  18. McPherson, M. S., & Smith, M. A. (2010). Educational inequality and three ways to address it. In D. Little & S. P. Mohanty (Eds.), The future of diversity – Academic leaders reflect on American higher education (pp. 109–121). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Niebuhr, A. (2010). Migration and innovation: does cultural diversity matter for regional R&D activity? Papers in Regional Science, 89(3), 563–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Özbilgin, M. F., & Tatli, A. (2008). Global diversity management – An evidence-based approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Pitts, D. W. (2005). Representative bureaucracy, ethnicity, and public schools: Examining the link between representation and performance (Research Paper Series Working Paper 06–16). Andrew Young School of Policy Studies. Accessed 17 Apr 2012.
  22. Raatikainen, P. (2002). Contributions of multiculturalism to the competitive advantage of an organisation. Singapore Management Review, 24(1), 81–88.Google Scholar
  23. Ratna, N. N., Quentin Grafton, R., & Kompas, T. (2009). Is diversity bad for economic growth? Evidence from state-level data in the US. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 859–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ross, A. (2009). Educational policies that address social inequality – overall report. Accessed 30 Apr 2012.
  25. Scheerens, J. (2004). Review of school and instructional effectiveness research. UNESCO. Accessed 30 Apr 2012.
  26. Snow, C., Davison, S. C., Snell, S. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Use transnational teams to globalize your company. Organizational Dynamics, 24(4), 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sobel, R. S., Dutta, N., & Roy, S. (2010). Does cultural diversity increase the rate of entrepreneurship? Review of Austrian Economics, 23(3), 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stahl, G. K., Maznevski, M. L., Voight, A., & Jonsen, K. (2010a). Unravelling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 690–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stahl, G. K., Mäkelä, K., Zanderd, L., & Maznevski, M. L. (2010b). A look at the bright side of multicultural team diversity. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Suarez-Orozco, M. M., & Suarez-Orozco, C. (2009). Globalization, immigration, and schooling. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), The Routledge international companion to multicultural education (pp. 62–76). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Tchibozo, G. (2002). Meta-functional criteria and school-to-work transition. Journal of Education and Work, 15(3), 339–352 & 15(4), 481–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tchibozo, G. (2004). The dynamics of school-to-work transition processes of university graduates: an analysis of French data. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 32(1), 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thomas, R. R. (2010). World class diversity management – A strategic approach. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Thomas, D. A., & Ely, R. J. (1996, September-October). Making differences matter – A new paradigm for managing diversity. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 79–90.Google Scholar
  35. Twigg, L., Taylor, J., & Mohan, J. (2010). Diversity or disadvantage? Putnam, ethnic heterogeneity, and collective efficacy. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 1421–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weisinger, J. Y., & Salipante, P. F., Jr. (2007). An expanded theory of pluralistic interactions in voluntary nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 18(2), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département des Sciences de l’éducationUniversité de LimogesLimogesFrance

Personalised recommendations