Subhuman, Superhuman, and Inhuman: Human Nature and the Enhanced Athlete
- 1.4k Downloads
Some critics argue that the problem with performance enhancements in sports is that their use distorts the humanity of the athlete, in of three ways: (1) that performance enhancements demean athletes, by treating them as less than fully human; (2) that the use of enhancement interventions by athletes represent a wilful form of ‘playing God’, transcending the natural limits of human nature; or (3) that performance enhancements ‘dehumanize’ athletes by distorting natural talents with human artifice. These arguments all have standard rebuttals in the sports ethics literature, linked by the problem that, to be persuasive for policy purposes, they must assert boundaries for human nature without a substantive account of what those boundaries enclose. I argue that, while seductive, the content-less vision of human nature employed in these critiques leaves the critics in a dangerous trap: in their efforts to be fashionably agnostic about the content of human nature they are forced back into a hierarchical genetic essentialism for sports much like those that have so repeatedly proven oppressive in other spheres of human activity.
KeywordsHuman Nature Natural Kind Performance Enhancement Athletic Performance Sport Competition
- Coakley, J. 1998. Sport in society: Issues and controversies, 6th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Cole-Turner, R. 1998. Do means matter? In Enhancing human traits: Ethical and social implications, ed. Parens Erik, 151–161. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
- Daniels, N. 2009. Can anyone really be talking about ethically modifying human nature? In Human enhancement, ed. Nick Bostrom and Julian Savulescu, 25–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J. 2003. The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Hoberman, J. 1992. Mortal engines: The science of performance and the dehumanization of sport. Caldwell: The Blackburn Press.Google Scholar
- Juengst, E. 2009. Annotating the moral map of enhancement: Gene doping, the limits of medicine and the spirit of sport. In Ethics, genetics and the future of sport: Implications of genetic modification and genetic selection, ed. Thomas Murray, 175–204. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
- Loland, S. 2002. Fair play in sport: A moral norm system. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mehlman, M. 2003. Genetic enhancement and the future of society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- President’s Council on Bioethics. 2003. Beyond therapy: Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness.http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/beyondtherapy. Accessed 27 Mar 2012.
- Sandel, M. 2004. The case against perfection: What’s wrong with designer children, bionic athletes and genetic engineering. The Atlantic Monthly 293: 51–62.Google Scholar
- Stout, J. 1988. Ethics after Babel: The languages of morals and their discontents. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Tamburrini, C. 2002. After doping, what? The morality of the genetic engineering of athletes. Sport Technology: History, Philosophy and Policy 21: 243–268.Google Scholar
- Tännsjö, T. 2000. Is our admiration for sports heroes fascistoid? In Values in sport: Elitism, nationalism gender equality and the scientific manufacture of winners, ed. Tännsjö Torbjörn and Tamburrini Claudio, 24–38. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Tännsjö, T. 2005. Genetic engineering and elitism in sport. In Genetic technology and sport: Ethical questions, ed. Tamburrini Claudio and Tännsjö Torbjörn, 57–70. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- World Anti-Doping Agency. 2006. WADA note on artificially induced hypoxic conditions. http://www.mcst.go.kr/servlets/eduport/front/upload/UplDownloadFile?pFileName=Note%20on%20Hypoxia%20May%202006.pdf&pRealName=F362307.pdf&pPath=0404150000. Accessed 27 Mar 2012.