Advertisement

Dignified Doping: Truly Unthinkable? An Existentialist Critique of ‘Talentocracy’ in Sports

  • Pieter BonteEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 52)

Abstract

As the activity of sporting has become deeply ensnared in cultures of hyper-competition and industries of shallow spectacle, many are unable or unwilling to consider how in healed sports (sub) cultures, doping may be done in dignity. To investigate this, I suspend all circumstantial issues surrounding doping, to see whether doping, in ‘the best of all possible worlds’, would remain problematic. Analysing the required origins, processes and outcomes of a proper athletic accomplishment, I conclude that doping need not be debasing, mechanistic nor dehumanizing. The deep integration of artifice in one’s body may even signify a courageous acceptance of the human condition of being ‘foundationlessly free and ruthlessly responsible’. As such, doping would be deeply dignified. In this light, I critique the deep attachment to natural talent in the justifications of anti-doping as attempts to sustain the comfortable but deceptive self-image of man as a creature which should follow the cues of its nature – develop its talents – to find purpose and meaning in life. Ironically, where ‘talentocrats’ cultivate natural forms, transhumanists cultivate a natural formula: evolution, thus becoming strange bedfellows in trying to connect human existence to the comforts of a ‘naturally given purpose’. To be human, however, is to be denied such an existential cradle. Intriguingly, sport is claimed both as a deceitful dreamland of soothing purposefulness and as a testimony to our troubling but true purposelessness. A truly virtuous spirit of sport should insist it is the latter.

Keywords

Natural Kind Human Enhancement Naturalistic Fallacy Virtuous Exploration Natural Talent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baillie, H. 2005. Aristotle and genetic engineering: The uncertainty of excellence. In Is human nature obsolete? Genetics, bioengineering, and the future of the human condition, ed. H. Baillie and T. Casey, 209–232. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bayertz, K. 2003. Human nature: How normative might it be? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28(2): 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, C. 2008. Bigger, stronger, faster. Is it still cheating if everyone is doing it? (Documentary). New York/Austin: Magnolia Home Entertainment.Google Scholar
  4. Bonte, P. 2008. De verbeterkunde: een ongewenste bevrijding? Ethiek en Maatschappij 11(2): 18–35.Google Scholar
  5. Bonte, P. 2011. Why should I be natural? A fivefold challenge to the supposed duty to ‘be natural’ as grounds for outlawing human enhancement. In Technologies on the stand: Legal and ethical questions in neuroscience and robotics, ed. B. van den Bergh and L. Klaming, 215–248. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, A. 2011. Beyond humanity. The ethics of biomedical enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buchanan, A., D. Brock, N. Daniels, and D. Wikler. 2000. From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrico, D. 2009. A condensed critique of transhumanism. Using technology to deepen democracy, using democracy to ensure technology benefits us all. Amor Mundi. http://amormundi.blogspot.com/2009/01/condensed-critique-of-transhumanism.html. Accessed 27 Mar 2012.
  9. Coubertin, P. 1992 [1913]. In Essais de psychologie sportive, ed. Rioux Jean-Pierre. Paris: Editions Jérôme Million.Google Scholar
  10. Dawkins, R. 2006a. The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Dawkins, R. 2006b. The selfish gene, 30 Anniversaryth ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. De Block, A., and S. Dewitte. 2009. Darwinism and the cultural evolution of sports. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeGrazia, D. 2005. Human identity and bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Della Mirandola, P. 1999 [1486]. Oratio on the dignity of man. In Reading About the World, Volume One, ed. Paul Brians, Mary Gallwey, Douglas Hughes, Azfar Hussain, Richard Law, Michael Myers Michael Neville, Roger Schlesinger, Alice Spitzer, and Susan Swan. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Custom Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliot, C. 2003. Better than well: American medicine meets the American dream. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  16. Fraleigh, W. 1984. Right actions in sport: Ethics for contestants. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Frankfurt, H. 1971. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. Journal of Philosophy 68(1): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fromm, E. 1960 [1942]. The fear of freedom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Guttman, A. 2002. The Olympics, a history of the modern games, 2nd ed. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hoberman, J. 2009. Putting doping into context: Historical and cultural perspectives. In Performance-enhancing technologies in sports. Ethical, conceptual, and scientific issues, ed. Thomas H. Murray, Karen J. Maschke, and Angela A. Wasunna, 3–27. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hofstadter, D. 2007. I am a strange loop. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Huizinga, J. 2008 [1938]. Homo Ludens. Proeve Eener Bepaling Van Het Spel-Element Der Cultuur. Amsterdam: Atheneum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hurley, S. 2002. Luck, responsibility and the ‘natural lottery’. Journal of Political Philosophy 10(1): 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huxley, A. 2006 [1946]. Brave new world. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.Google Scholar
  25. Jefferson, T. 1988 [1813]. The Adams-Jefferson letters: The complete correspondence between Thomas Jefferson and Abigail and John Adams, ed. Lester Cappon. Chapel Hill/London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  26. Juengst, E. 2009. Annotating the moral map of enhancement: Gene doping, the limits of medicine and the spirit of sport. In Performance-enhancing technologies in sports. Ethical, conceptual, and scientific issues, ed. Thomas H. Murray, Karen J. Maschke, and Angela A. Wasunna. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kass, L. 2002. Life, liberty, and defence of dignity: The challenge for bioethics. San Francisco: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
  28. Kass, L. 2003. Ageless bodies, happy souls. The New Atlantis 1: 9–28. http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/ageless-bodies-happy-souls. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.
  29. Krynski, M., and R. Maguire. 1981. Sounds, feelings, thoughts: Seventy poems by Wislawa Szymborska. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Levy, N. 2011. Enhancing authenticity. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28(3): 308–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loland, S., and H. Hoppeler. 2012. Justifying anti-doping: The fair opportunity principle and the biology of performance enhancement. European Journal of Sport Science 12: 347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKibben, B. 2004. Enough. Staying human in an engineered age. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  33. Mehlman, M. 2009. The price of perfection. Individualism and society in the era of biomedical enhancement. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Missa, J.-N., and P. Nouvel. 2011. Philosophie du Dopage. Paris: Presse Universitaire de la France.Google Scholar
  35. Murray, T. 2009a. Ethics and endurance-enhancing technologies in sport. In Performance-enhancing technologies in sports. Ethical, conceptual, and scientific issues, ed. Thomas H. Murray, Karen J. Maschke, and Angela A. Wasunna, 141–159. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Murray, T. 2009b. In search of an ethics for sport: Genetic hierarchies, handicappers general, and embodied excellence. In Performance-enhancing technologies in sports. Ethical, conceptual, and scientific issues, ed. Thomas H. Murray, Karen J. Maschke, and Angela A. Wasunna, 225–238. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. President’s Council on Bioethics. 2003. Beyond therapy. Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. Washington: Dana Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sandel, M. 2007. The case against perfection. Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Cambridge/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sartre, J-P. 1989 [1946]. Existentialism is a humanism. Translated by Philip Mairet. Reproduced from Existentialism from Dostoyevsky to Sartre, ed. Walter Kaufman. Meridian Publishing Company. http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/sartre/works/exist/sartre.htm. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.
  42. Savulescu, J., B. Foddy, and M. Clayton. 2004. Why we should allow performance enhancing drugs in sport. British Journal Of Sports Magazine 38: 666–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schechtman, M. 2004. Self-expression and self-control. Ratio 7: 409–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwartz, B. 2004. The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Starckx, S. 01/07/2008. Interview ex-schaatskampioen en sportwetenschapper Harm Kuipers. ‘Doping is voor een groot stuk placebo.’ EOS Magazine: 116–119.Google Scholar
  46. Suits, B. 1978. The grasshopper: Games, life and utopia. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Tallis, R. 2007. Enhancing humanity. Philosophy Now Magazine. http://www.philosophynow.org/issues/61/Enhancing_Humanity. Accessed 29 Mar 2012.
  48. Tännsjö, T. 2000. Is it fascistoid to admire sports heroes? In Values in sport: Elitism, nationalism, gender equality, and the scientific manufacturing of winners, ed. Tännsjö Torbjörn and Claudio Tamburinni. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Van Hilvoorde, I., R. Vos, and G. de Wert. 2007. Flopping, klapping and gene doping: Dichotomies between ‘Natural’ and ‘Artificial’ in elite sport. Social Studies of Science 37(2): 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weir, J.S. 2011. Theology of sport – historical overview. Verité Sport. http://www.veritesport.org/downloads/Theology_of_Sport_An_historical_review.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2012.
  51. World AntiDoping Code. 2009. World Anti-doping Agency. http://www.wada-ama.org/World-Anti-Doping-Program/Sports-and-Anti-Doping-Organizations/The-Code/. Accessed 27 Mar 2012.
  52. Young, D. 1996. The modern Olympics: A struggle for revival. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG)Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations